Cargando…
Do female dieters have an “eating disorder” self-schema?
BACKGROUND: The processing of schema-related information is important in the maintenance of specific eating disorder (ED)-related belief systems and psychopathology. To date, most research on differences in the processing of ED schematic information has used interview or self-report questionnaire me...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27186372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-016-0103-5 |
_version_ | 1782432129964048384 |
---|---|
author | Greer, Sarah Cooper, Myra |
author_facet | Greer, Sarah Cooper, Myra |
author_sort | Greer, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The processing of schema-related information is important in the maintenance of specific eating disorder (ED)-related belief systems and psychopathology. To date, most research on differences in the processing of ED schematic information has used interview or self-report questionnaire measures. Dieting is a known risk factor for EDs and dieters have been included in some studies. However, they have not been compared with non-dieters on a novel, objective measure of ED related schema processing. METHODS: The current study recruited healthy female volunteers from the community and divided them into dieting (n = 25) and non-dieting (n = 24) groups using rigorous criteria. ED self-schemas with content unrelated to eating, weight and shape were measured using a self-schema processing task. RESULTS: Dieters endorsed significantly more ED relevant words compared to non-dieters, whereas non-dieters rejected significantly more ED relevant words compared to dieters. Reaction times to endorsements and rejections were non-significant when the two groups were compared. In a surprise recall task, dieters recalled significantly more ED relevant words. CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the presence of ED self-schemas with negative content unrelated to eating, weight and shape in otherwise healthy dieters. Implications for future research and the early identification of individuals vulnerable to EDs are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4868032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48680322016-05-17 Do female dieters have an “eating disorder” self-schema? Greer, Sarah Cooper, Myra J Eat Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The processing of schema-related information is important in the maintenance of specific eating disorder (ED)-related belief systems and psychopathology. To date, most research on differences in the processing of ED schematic information has used interview or self-report questionnaire measures. Dieting is a known risk factor for EDs and dieters have been included in some studies. However, they have not been compared with non-dieters on a novel, objective measure of ED related schema processing. METHODS: The current study recruited healthy female volunteers from the community and divided them into dieting (n = 25) and non-dieting (n = 24) groups using rigorous criteria. ED self-schemas with content unrelated to eating, weight and shape were measured using a self-schema processing task. RESULTS: Dieters endorsed significantly more ED relevant words compared to non-dieters, whereas non-dieters rejected significantly more ED relevant words compared to dieters. Reaction times to endorsements and rejections were non-significant when the two groups were compared. In a surprise recall task, dieters recalled significantly more ED relevant words. CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the presence of ED self-schemas with negative content unrelated to eating, weight and shape in otherwise healthy dieters. Implications for future research and the early identification of individuals vulnerable to EDs are discussed. BioMed Central 2016-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4868032/ /pubmed/27186372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-016-0103-5 Text en © Greer and Cooper. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Greer, Sarah Cooper, Myra Do female dieters have an “eating disorder” self-schema? |
title | Do female dieters have an “eating disorder” self-schema? |
title_full | Do female dieters have an “eating disorder” self-schema? |
title_fullStr | Do female dieters have an “eating disorder” self-schema? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do female dieters have an “eating disorder” self-schema? |
title_short | Do female dieters have an “eating disorder” self-schema? |
title_sort | do female dieters have an “eating disorder” self-schema? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27186372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-016-0103-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greersarah dofemaledietershaveaneatingdisorderselfschema AT coopermyra dofemaledietershaveaneatingdisorderselfschema |