Cargando…

Do Patients After Chondrosarcoma Treatment Have Age-appropriate Bone Mineral Density in the Long Term?

BACKGROUND: In long-term survivors of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma treated with the addition of radio- and chemotherapy, low bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures have been observed, presumably resulting from these adjuvants. Because patients with chondrosarcoma usually are not treated with con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hobusch, Gerhard M., Tiefenboeck, Thomas M., Patsch, Janina, Krall, Christoph, Holzer, Gerold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26883654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4741-3
_version_ 1782432141700759552
author Hobusch, Gerhard M.
Tiefenboeck, Thomas M.
Patsch, Janina
Krall, Christoph
Holzer, Gerold
author_facet Hobusch, Gerhard M.
Tiefenboeck, Thomas M.
Patsch, Janina
Krall, Christoph
Holzer, Gerold
author_sort Hobusch, Gerhard M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In long-term survivors of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma treated with the addition of radio- and chemotherapy, low bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures have been observed, presumably resulting from these adjuvants. Because patients with chondrosarcoma usually are not treated with conventional adjuvant treatment, observation of low BMD in patients with chondrosarcoma presumably would be the result of other mechanisms. However, BMD in patients with a history of chondrosarcoma has not been well characterized. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The aim of our study was to address the following questions: (1) Do long-term survivors of chondrosarcoma have normal BMD and, if not, which factors contribute to low BMD? (2) Is there a greater risk of fracture and does the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX(®)) score reflect fracture likelihood? METHODS: All known patients with a history of chondrosarcoma treated at our institution before 2006 were identified. Of 127 patients believed to be alive at the time of this study, 30 agreed to participate in this study (11 females, 19 males; mean age at surgery, 39 ± 12 years; mean followup, 12 ± 5 years). With the data available, the 30 participants were not different from the 97 nonparticipants in terms of age, sex, BMI, tumor grade, tumor location (axial versus appendicular, lower extremity versus elsewhere), and use of any treatment known to influence osteopenia (chemotherapy, lower extremity surgery). BMD was measured and history of fractures was assessed using a questionnaire. The patients´ BMD measurements in this study were sex- and age-matched with a normative sex- and age-categorized reference population reported by Kudlacek et al. Associations were tested by univariate regressions and ANOVAs of all measures of BMD and eligible oncologic and demographic factors. RESULTS: Eighteen of 30 (60%) patients had a pathologic BMD according to the WHO dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry definition, 15 (50%) had osteopenia, and three (10%) had osteoporosis. T-scores in the study cohort were lower than reference values for the femur neck (mean difference, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.27–1.01; p < 0.0015), but not for the spine (mean difference, 0.39; 95% CI, −0.06 to 0.84; p = 0.09). Thirteen patients (45%) reported a history of fractures not distinguishing between low and high impact. The incidence of fractures was 2.8 greater than expected from a comparison with a published microcensus survey of the Austrian population. No effect of the FRAX(®) score on fracture risk could be identified (p = 0.057). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survivors of chondrosarcoma appear to be at greater risk for having low BMD develop than the healthy population. Although these results are preliminary and based on a very small sampling of patients, if they can be confirmed in larger studies, BMD assessment by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry might be considered as these patients are followed posttreatment by sarcoma care units. The reasons for low BMD still must be elucidated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4868166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48681662016-05-31 Do Patients After Chondrosarcoma Treatment Have Age-appropriate Bone Mineral Density in the Long Term? Hobusch, Gerhard M. Tiefenboeck, Thomas M. Patsch, Janina Krall, Christoph Holzer, Gerold Clin Orthop Relat Res Clinical Research BACKGROUND: In long-term survivors of osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma treated with the addition of radio- and chemotherapy, low bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures have been observed, presumably resulting from these adjuvants. Because patients with chondrosarcoma usually are not treated with conventional adjuvant treatment, observation of low BMD in patients with chondrosarcoma presumably would be the result of other mechanisms. However, BMD in patients with a history of chondrosarcoma has not been well characterized. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The aim of our study was to address the following questions: (1) Do long-term survivors of chondrosarcoma have normal BMD and, if not, which factors contribute to low BMD? (2) Is there a greater risk of fracture and does the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX(®)) score reflect fracture likelihood? METHODS: All known patients with a history of chondrosarcoma treated at our institution before 2006 were identified. Of 127 patients believed to be alive at the time of this study, 30 agreed to participate in this study (11 females, 19 males; mean age at surgery, 39 ± 12 years; mean followup, 12 ± 5 years). With the data available, the 30 participants were not different from the 97 nonparticipants in terms of age, sex, BMI, tumor grade, tumor location (axial versus appendicular, lower extremity versus elsewhere), and use of any treatment known to influence osteopenia (chemotherapy, lower extremity surgery). BMD was measured and history of fractures was assessed using a questionnaire. The patients´ BMD measurements in this study were sex- and age-matched with a normative sex- and age-categorized reference population reported by Kudlacek et al. Associations were tested by univariate regressions and ANOVAs of all measures of BMD and eligible oncologic and demographic factors. RESULTS: Eighteen of 30 (60%) patients had a pathologic BMD according to the WHO dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry definition, 15 (50%) had osteopenia, and three (10%) had osteoporosis. T-scores in the study cohort were lower than reference values for the femur neck (mean difference, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.27–1.01; p < 0.0015), but not for the spine (mean difference, 0.39; 95% CI, −0.06 to 0.84; p = 0.09). Thirteen patients (45%) reported a history of fractures not distinguishing between low and high impact. The incidence of fractures was 2.8 greater than expected from a comparison with a published microcensus survey of the Austrian population. No effect of the FRAX(®) score on fracture risk could be identified (p = 0.057). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survivors of chondrosarcoma appear to be at greater risk for having low BMD develop than the healthy population. Although these results are preliminary and based on a very small sampling of patients, if they can be confirmed in larger studies, BMD assessment by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry might be considered as these patients are followed posttreatment by sarcoma care units. The reasons for low BMD still must be elucidated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic study. Springer US 2016-02-16 2016-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4868166/ /pubmed/26883654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4741-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Hobusch, Gerhard M.
Tiefenboeck, Thomas M.
Patsch, Janina
Krall, Christoph
Holzer, Gerold
Do Patients After Chondrosarcoma Treatment Have Age-appropriate Bone Mineral Density in the Long Term?
title Do Patients After Chondrosarcoma Treatment Have Age-appropriate Bone Mineral Density in the Long Term?
title_full Do Patients After Chondrosarcoma Treatment Have Age-appropriate Bone Mineral Density in the Long Term?
title_fullStr Do Patients After Chondrosarcoma Treatment Have Age-appropriate Bone Mineral Density in the Long Term?
title_full_unstemmed Do Patients After Chondrosarcoma Treatment Have Age-appropriate Bone Mineral Density in the Long Term?
title_short Do Patients After Chondrosarcoma Treatment Have Age-appropriate Bone Mineral Density in the Long Term?
title_sort do patients after chondrosarcoma treatment have age-appropriate bone mineral density in the long term?
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26883654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-4741-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hobuschgerhardm dopatientsafterchondrosarcomatreatmenthaveageappropriatebonemineraldensityinthelongterm
AT tiefenboeckthomasm dopatientsafterchondrosarcomatreatmenthaveageappropriatebonemineraldensityinthelongterm
AT patschjanina dopatientsafterchondrosarcomatreatmenthaveageappropriatebonemineraldensityinthelongterm
AT krallchristoph dopatientsafterchondrosarcomatreatmenthaveageappropriatebonemineraldensityinthelongterm
AT holzergerold dopatientsafterchondrosarcomatreatmenthaveageappropriatebonemineraldensityinthelongterm