Cargando…

Tumor deposits: markers of poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND: Tumor deposits (TDs) were reported to be poor prognoses in colorectal carcinoma, but the significance in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) (T3-4/N+) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT) and surgery is unclear. Since adjuvant chemotherapy showed no benefit for LARC follow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Lu-Ning, Xiao, Wei-Wei, Xi, Shao-Yan, OuYang, Pu-Yun, You, Kai-Yun, Zeng, Zhi-Fan, Ding, Pei-Rong, Zhang, Hui-Zhong, Pan, Zhi-Zhong, Xu, Rui-Hua, Gao, Yuan-Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26695441
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6656
_version_ 1782432205990002688
author Zhang, Lu-Ning
Xiao, Wei-Wei
Xi, Shao-Yan
OuYang, Pu-Yun
You, Kai-Yun
Zeng, Zhi-Fan
Ding, Pei-Rong
Zhang, Hui-Zhong
Pan, Zhi-Zhong
Xu, Rui-Hua
Gao, Yuan-Hong
author_facet Zhang, Lu-Ning
Xiao, Wei-Wei
Xi, Shao-Yan
OuYang, Pu-Yun
You, Kai-Yun
Zeng, Zhi-Fan
Ding, Pei-Rong
Zhang, Hui-Zhong
Pan, Zhi-Zhong
Xu, Rui-Hua
Gao, Yuan-Hong
author_sort Zhang, Lu-Ning
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tumor deposits (TDs) were reported to be poor prognoses in colorectal carcinoma, but the significance in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) (T3-4/N+) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT) and surgery is unclear. Since adjuvant chemotherapy showed no benefit for LARC following neo-CRT, it is of great value to investigate whether TDs can identify the subgroup of patients who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2012, 310 LARC patients following neo-CRT and surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and local recurrence free survival (LRFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox models. RESULTS: TDs-positive patients showed adverse OS, DFS and DMFS (all P≤0.001), but not LRFS (P = 0.273). In multivariate analysis, TDs continued to be associated with poor OS (HR = 2.44, 95% CI 1.32-4.4, P = 0.004) and DFS (HR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.21-3.27, P = 0.007), but not DMFS (HR = 1.77, 95% CI 0.97-3.20, P = 0.061) or LRFS (HR = 1.85, 95% CI 0.58-5.85, P = 0.298). Among TDs-positive patients, adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved OS (P = 0.045) and DMFS (P = 0.026), but not DFS (P = 0.127) or LRFS (P = 0.862). CONCLUSIONS: TDs are predictive of poor survival in LARC after neo-CRT. Fortunately, TDs-positive patients appear to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4868760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48687602016-05-20 Tumor deposits: markers of poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy Zhang, Lu-Ning Xiao, Wei-Wei Xi, Shao-Yan OuYang, Pu-Yun You, Kai-Yun Zeng, Zhi-Fan Ding, Pei-Rong Zhang, Hui-Zhong Pan, Zhi-Zhong Xu, Rui-Hua Gao, Yuan-Hong Oncotarget Clinical Research Paper BACKGROUND: Tumor deposits (TDs) were reported to be poor prognoses in colorectal carcinoma, but the significance in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) (T3-4/N+) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT) and surgery is unclear. Since adjuvant chemotherapy showed no benefit for LARC following neo-CRT, it is of great value to investigate whether TDs can identify the subgroup of patients who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2012, 310 LARC patients following neo-CRT and surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and local recurrence free survival (LRFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox models. RESULTS: TDs-positive patients showed adverse OS, DFS and DMFS (all P≤0.001), but not LRFS (P = 0.273). In multivariate analysis, TDs continued to be associated with poor OS (HR = 2.44, 95% CI 1.32-4.4, P = 0.004) and DFS (HR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.21-3.27, P = 0.007), but not DMFS (HR = 1.77, 95% CI 0.97-3.20, P = 0.061) or LRFS (HR = 1.85, 95% CI 0.58-5.85, P = 0.298). Among TDs-positive patients, adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved OS (P = 0.045) and DMFS (P = 0.026), but not DFS (P = 0.127) or LRFS (P = 0.862). CONCLUSIONS: TDs are predictive of poor survival in LARC after neo-CRT. Fortunately, TDs-positive patients appear to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Impact Journals LLC 2015-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4868760/ /pubmed/26695441 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6656 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Zhang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research Paper
Zhang, Lu-Ning
Xiao, Wei-Wei
Xi, Shao-Yan
OuYang, Pu-Yun
You, Kai-Yun
Zeng, Zhi-Fan
Ding, Pei-Rong
Zhang, Hui-Zhong
Pan, Zhi-Zhong
Xu, Rui-Hua
Gao, Yuan-Hong
Tumor deposits: markers of poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title Tumor deposits: markers of poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_full Tumor deposits: markers of poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_fullStr Tumor deposits: markers of poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Tumor deposits: markers of poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_short Tumor deposits: markers of poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
title_sort tumor deposits: markers of poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
topic Clinical Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26695441
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.6656
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangluning tumordepositsmarkersofpoorprognosisinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT xiaoweiwei tumordepositsmarkersofpoorprognosisinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT xishaoyan tumordepositsmarkersofpoorprognosisinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT ouyangpuyun tumordepositsmarkersofpoorprognosisinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT youkaiyun tumordepositsmarkersofpoorprognosisinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT zengzhifan tumordepositsmarkersofpoorprognosisinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT dingpeirong tumordepositsmarkersofpoorprognosisinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT zhanghuizhong tumordepositsmarkersofpoorprognosisinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT panzhizhong tumordepositsmarkersofpoorprognosisinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT xuruihua tumordepositsmarkersofpoorprognosisinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy
AT gaoyuanhong tumordepositsmarkersofpoorprognosisinpatientswithlocallyadvancedrectalcancerfollowingneoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy