Cargando…

Comparison of Measures of Ability in Adolescents with Intellectual Disability

Finding the most appropriate intelligence test for adolescents with Intellectual Disability (ID) is challenging given their limited language, attention, perceptual, and motor skills and ability to stay on task. The study compared performance of 23 adolescents with ID on the Wechsler Intelligence Sca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mungkhetklang, Chantanee, Crewther, Sheila G., Bavin, Edith L., Goharpey, Nahal, Parsons, Carl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27242597
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00683
_version_ 1782432211289505792
author Mungkhetklang, Chantanee
Crewther, Sheila G.
Bavin, Edith L.
Goharpey, Nahal
Parsons, Carl
author_facet Mungkhetklang, Chantanee
Crewther, Sheila G.
Bavin, Edith L.
Goharpey, Nahal
Parsons, Carl
author_sort Mungkhetklang, Chantanee
collection PubMed
description Finding the most appropriate intelligence test for adolescents with Intellectual Disability (ID) is challenging given their limited language, attention, perceptual, and motor skills and ability to stay on task. The study compared performance of 23 adolescents with ID on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV), one of the most widely used intelligence tests, and three non-verbal IQ tests, the Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices (RCPM), the Test of Non-verbal Intelligence-Fourth Edition and the Wechsler Non-verbal test of Ability. Results showed that the WISC-IV Full Scale IQ raw and scaled scores were highly correlated with total scores from the three non-verbal tests, although the correlations were higher for raw scores, suggesting they may lead to better understanding of within group differences and what individuals with ID can do at the time of assessment. All participants attempted more questions on the non-verbal tests than the verbal. A preliminary analysis showed that adolescents with ID without ASD (n = 15) achieved higher scores overall than those presenting with ID+ASD (n = 8). Our findings support the view that short non-verbal tests are more likely to give a similar IQ result as obtained from the WISC-IV. In terms of the time to administer and the stress for participants, they are more appropriate for assessing adolescents with ID.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4868842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48688422016-05-30 Comparison of Measures of Ability in Adolescents with Intellectual Disability Mungkhetklang, Chantanee Crewther, Sheila G. Bavin, Edith L. Goharpey, Nahal Parsons, Carl Front Psychol Psychology Finding the most appropriate intelligence test for adolescents with Intellectual Disability (ID) is challenging given their limited language, attention, perceptual, and motor skills and ability to stay on task. The study compared performance of 23 adolescents with ID on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV), one of the most widely used intelligence tests, and three non-verbal IQ tests, the Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices (RCPM), the Test of Non-verbal Intelligence-Fourth Edition and the Wechsler Non-verbal test of Ability. Results showed that the WISC-IV Full Scale IQ raw and scaled scores were highly correlated with total scores from the three non-verbal tests, although the correlations were higher for raw scores, suggesting they may lead to better understanding of within group differences and what individuals with ID can do at the time of assessment. All participants attempted more questions on the non-verbal tests than the verbal. A preliminary analysis showed that adolescents with ID without ASD (n = 15) achieved higher scores overall than those presenting with ID+ASD (n = 8). Our findings support the view that short non-verbal tests are more likely to give a similar IQ result as obtained from the WISC-IV. In terms of the time to administer and the stress for participants, they are more appropriate for assessing adolescents with ID. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4868842/ /pubmed/27242597 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00683 Text en Copyright © 2016 Mungkhetklang, Crewther, Bavin, Goharpey and Parsons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Mungkhetklang, Chantanee
Crewther, Sheila G.
Bavin, Edith L.
Goharpey, Nahal
Parsons, Carl
Comparison of Measures of Ability in Adolescents with Intellectual Disability
title Comparison of Measures of Ability in Adolescents with Intellectual Disability
title_full Comparison of Measures of Ability in Adolescents with Intellectual Disability
title_fullStr Comparison of Measures of Ability in Adolescents with Intellectual Disability
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Measures of Ability in Adolescents with Intellectual Disability
title_short Comparison of Measures of Ability in Adolescents with Intellectual Disability
title_sort comparison of measures of ability in adolescents with intellectual disability
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27242597
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00683
work_keys_str_mv AT mungkhetklangchantanee comparisonofmeasuresofabilityinadolescentswithintellectualdisability
AT crewthersheilag comparisonofmeasuresofabilityinadolescentswithintellectualdisability
AT bavinedithl comparisonofmeasuresofabilityinadolescentswithintellectualdisability
AT goharpeynahal comparisonofmeasuresofabilityinadolescentswithintellectualdisability
AT parsonscarl comparisonofmeasuresofabilityinadolescentswithintellectualdisability