Cargando…
Biocompatibility of two experimental scaffolds for regenerative endodontics
OBJECTIVES: The biocompatibility of two experimental scaffolds for potential use in revascularization or pulp regeneration was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One resilient lyophilized collagen scaffold (COLL), releasing metronidazole and clindamycin, was compared to an experimental injectable pol...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27200277 http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.2.98 |
_version_ | 1782432220752904192 |
---|---|
author | Leong, Dephne Jack Xin Setzer, Frank C. Trope, Martin Karabucak, Bekir |
author_facet | Leong, Dephne Jack Xin Setzer, Frank C. Trope, Martin Karabucak, Bekir |
author_sort | Leong, Dephne Jack Xin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The biocompatibility of two experimental scaffolds for potential use in revascularization or pulp regeneration was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One resilient lyophilized collagen scaffold (COLL), releasing metronidazole and clindamycin, was compared to an experimental injectable poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid scaffold (PLGA), releasing clindamycin. Human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) were seeded at densities of 1.0 × 10(4), 2.5 × 10(4), and 5.0 × 10(4). The cells were investigated by light microscopy (cell morphology), MTT assay (cell proliferation) and a cytokine (IL-8) ELISA test (biocompatibility). RESULTS: Under microscope, the morphology of cells coincubated for 7 days with the scaffolds appeared healthy with COLL. Cells in contact with PLGA showed signs of degeneration and apoptosis. MTT assay showed that at 5.0 × 10(4) hDPSCs, COLL demonstrated significantly higher cell proliferation rates than cells in media only (control, p < 0.01) or cells co-incubated with PLGA (p < 0.01). In ELISA test, no significant differences were observed between cells with media only and COLL at 1, 3, and 6 days. Cells incubated with PLGA expressed significantly higher IL-8 than the control at all time points (p < 0.01) and compared to COLL after 1 and 3 days (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The COLL showed superior biocompatibility and thus may be suitable for endodontic regeneration purposes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4868884 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48688842016-05-19 Biocompatibility of two experimental scaffolds for regenerative endodontics Leong, Dephne Jack Xin Setzer, Frank C. Trope, Martin Karabucak, Bekir Restor Dent Endod Research Article OBJECTIVES: The biocompatibility of two experimental scaffolds for potential use in revascularization or pulp regeneration was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One resilient lyophilized collagen scaffold (COLL), releasing metronidazole and clindamycin, was compared to an experimental injectable poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid scaffold (PLGA), releasing clindamycin. Human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs) were seeded at densities of 1.0 × 10(4), 2.5 × 10(4), and 5.0 × 10(4). The cells were investigated by light microscopy (cell morphology), MTT assay (cell proliferation) and a cytokine (IL-8) ELISA test (biocompatibility). RESULTS: Under microscope, the morphology of cells coincubated for 7 days with the scaffolds appeared healthy with COLL. Cells in contact with PLGA showed signs of degeneration and apoptosis. MTT assay showed that at 5.0 × 10(4) hDPSCs, COLL demonstrated significantly higher cell proliferation rates than cells in media only (control, p < 0.01) or cells co-incubated with PLGA (p < 0.01). In ELISA test, no significant differences were observed between cells with media only and COLL at 1, 3, and 6 days. Cells incubated with PLGA expressed significantly higher IL-8 than the control at all time points (p < 0.01) and compared to COLL after 1 and 3 days (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The COLL showed superior biocompatibility and thus may be suitable for endodontic regeneration purposes. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 2016-05 2016-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4868884/ /pubmed/27200277 http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.2.98 Text en ©Copyrights 2016. The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Leong, Dephne Jack Xin Setzer, Frank C. Trope, Martin Karabucak, Bekir Biocompatibility of two experimental scaffolds for regenerative endodontics |
title | Biocompatibility of two experimental scaffolds for regenerative endodontics |
title_full | Biocompatibility of two experimental scaffolds for regenerative endodontics |
title_fullStr | Biocompatibility of two experimental scaffolds for regenerative endodontics |
title_full_unstemmed | Biocompatibility of two experimental scaffolds for regenerative endodontics |
title_short | Biocompatibility of two experimental scaffolds for regenerative endodontics |
title_sort | biocompatibility of two experimental scaffolds for regenerative endodontics |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868884/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27200277 http://dx.doi.org/10.5395/rde.2016.41.2.98 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leongdephnejackxin biocompatibilityoftwoexperimentalscaffoldsforregenerativeendodontics AT setzerfrankc biocompatibilityoftwoexperimentalscaffoldsforregenerativeendodontics AT tropemartin biocompatibilityoftwoexperimentalscaffoldsforregenerativeendodontics AT karabucakbekir biocompatibilityoftwoexperimentalscaffoldsforregenerativeendodontics |