Cargando…

Gender differences in CNV burden do not confound schizophrenia CNV associations

Compared with the general population, an excess of rare copy number variants (CNVs) has been identified in people with schizophrenia. Females with neurodevelopmental disorders and in the general population have been reported to carry more large, rare CNVs than males. Given that many schizophrenia da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Jun, Walters, James T. R., Kirov, George, Pocklington, Andrew, Escott-Price, Valentina, Owen, Michael J., Holmans, Peter, O’Donovan, Michael C., Rees, Elliott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27185616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep25986
_version_ 1782432248631394304
author Han, Jun
Walters, James T. R.
Kirov, George
Pocklington, Andrew
Escott-Price, Valentina
Owen, Michael J.
Holmans, Peter
O’Donovan, Michael C.
Rees, Elliott
author_facet Han, Jun
Walters, James T. R.
Kirov, George
Pocklington, Andrew
Escott-Price, Valentina
Owen, Michael J.
Holmans, Peter
O’Donovan, Michael C.
Rees, Elliott
author_sort Han, Jun
collection PubMed
description Compared with the general population, an excess of rare copy number variants (CNVs) has been identified in people with schizophrenia. Females with neurodevelopmental disorders and in the general population have been reported to carry more large, rare CNVs than males. Given that many schizophrenia datasets do not have equal gender ratios in cases and controls, sex differences in CNV burden might have impacted on estimates of case-related CNV burden and also on associations to individual loci. In a sample of 13,276 cases and 17,863 controls, we observed a small but significant excess of large (≥500 Kb), rare (<1%) CNVs in females compared with males in both cases and controls (OR = 1.17, P = 0.0012 for controls; OR = 1.11, P = 0.045 for cases). The burden of 11 schizophrenia-associated CNVs was significantly higher in female cases compared with male cases (OR = 1.38, P = 0.0055), but after accounting for the rates of CNVs in controls, we found no significant gender difference in the risk conferred by these loci. Controlling for gender had a negligible effect on the significance of association between specific CNVs and schizophrenia. The female excess of large CNVs in both cases and controls suggests a female protective mechanism exists for deleterious CNVs that may extend beyond neurodevelopmental phenotypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4869015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48690152016-06-01 Gender differences in CNV burden do not confound schizophrenia CNV associations Han, Jun Walters, James T. R. Kirov, George Pocklington, Andrew Escott-Price, Valentina Owen, Michael J. Holmans, Peter O’Donovan, Michael C. Rees, Elliott Sci Rep Article Compared with the general population, an excess of rare copy number variants (CNVs) has been identified in people with schizophrenia. Females with neurodevelopmental disorders and in the general population have been reported to carry more large, rare CNVs than males. Given that many schizophrenia datasets do not have equal gender ratios in cases and controls, sex differences in CNV burden might have impacted on estimates of case-related CNV burden and also on associations to individual loci. In a sample of 13,276 cases and 17,863 controls, we observed a small but significant excess of large (≥500 Kb), rare (<1%) CNVs in females compared with males in both cases and controls (OR = 1.17, P = 0.0012 for controls; OR = 1.11, P = 0.045 for cases). The burden of 11 schizophrenia-associated CNVs was significantly higher in female cases compared with male cases (OR = 1.38, P = 0.0055), but after accounting for the rates of CNVs in controls, we found no significant gender difference in the risk conferred by these loci. Controlling for gender had a negligible effect on the significance of association between specific CNVs and schizophrenia. The female excess of large CNVs in both cases and controls suggests a female protective mechanism exists for deleterious CNVs that may extend beyond neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Nature Publishing Group 2016-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4869015/ /pubmed/27185616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep25986 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Han, Jun
Walters, James T. R.
Kirov, George
Pocklington, Andrew
Escott-Price, Valentina
Owen, Michael J.
Holmans, Peter
O’Donovan, Michael C.
Rees, Elliott
Gender differences in CNV burden do not confound schizophrenia CNV associations
title Gender differences in CNV burden do not confound schizophrenia CNV associations
title_full Gender differences in CNV burden do not confound schizophrenia CNV associations
title_fullStr Gender differences in CNV burden do not confound schizophrenia CNV associations
title_full_unstemmed Gender differences in CNV burden do not confound schizophrenia CNV associations
title_short Gender differences in CNV burden do not confound schizophrenia CNV associations
title_sort gender differences in cnv burden do not confound schizophrenia cnv associations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27185616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep25986
work_keys_str_mv AT hanjun genderdifferencesincnvburdendonotconfoundschizophreniacnvassociations
AT waltersjamestr genderdifferencesincnvburdendonotconfoundschizophreniacnvassociations
AT kirovgeorge genderdifferencesincnvburdendonotconfoundschizophreniacnvassociations
AT pocklingtonandrew genderdifferencesincnvburdendonotconfoundschizophreniacnvassociations
AT escottpricevalentina genderdifferencesincnvburdendonotconfoundschizophreniacnvassociations
AT owenmichaelj genderdifferencesincnvburdendonotconfoundschizophreniacnvassociations
AT holmanspeter genderdifferencesincnvburdendonotconfoundschizophreniacnvassociations
AT odonovanmichaelc genderdifferencesincnvburdendonotconfoundschizophreniacnvassociations
AT reeselliott genderdifferencesincnvburdendonotconfoundschizophreniacnvassociations