Cargando…

The Tobacco Pack Surveillance System: A Protocol for Assessing Health Warning Compliance, Design Features, and Appeals of Tobacco Packs Sold in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

BACKGROUND: Tobacco remains the world’s leading preventable cause of death, with the majority of tobacco-caused deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries. The first global health treaty, the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), outlines a set of policy initiatives that have bee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Katherine, Washington, Carmen, Brown, Jennifer, Vadnais, Alison, Kroart, Laura, Ferguson, Jacqueline, Cohen, Joanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27227142
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.4616
_version_ 1782432275068092416
author Smith, Katherine
Washington, Carmen
Brown, Jennifer
Vadnais, Alison
Kroart, Laura
Ferguson, Jacqueline
Cohen, Joanna
author_facet Smith, Katherine
Washington, Carmen
Brown, Jennifer
Vadnais, Alison
Kroart, Laura
Ferguson, Jacqueline
Cohen, Joanna
author_sort Smith, Katherine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tobacco remains the world’s leading preventable cause of death, with the majority of tobacco-caused deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries. The first global health treaty, the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), outlines a set of policy initiatives that have been demonstrated as effective in reducing tobacco use. Article 11 of the FCTC focuses on using the tobacco package to communicate tobacco-caused harms; it also seeks to restrict the delivery of misleading information about the product on the pack. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to establish a surveillance system for tobacco packs in the 14 low- and middle-income countries with the greatest number of smokers. The Tobacco Pack Surveillance System (TPackSS) monitors whether required health warnings on tobacco packages are being implemented as intended, and identifies pack designs and appeals that might violate or detract from the communication of harm-related information and undermine the impact of a country’s tobacco packaging laws. The protocol outlined is intended to be applicable or adaptable for surveillance efforts in other countries. METHODS: Tobacco packs were collected in 14 countries during 2013. The intention was, to the extent possible, to construct a census of “unique” pack presentations available for purchase in each country. The TPackSS team partnered with in-country field staff to implement a standardized protocol for acquiring packs from 36 diverse neighborhoods across three cities in each country. At the time of purchase, data on price and place of acquisition of each pack was recorded. The field staff, according to a standardized protocol, then photographed packs before they were shipped to the United States for coding and archiving. RESULTS: Each pack was coded for compliance with the country-specific health warning label laws, as well as for key design features of the pack and appeals of the branding elements. The coding protocols were developed based upon prior research, expert opinion, and communication theories. Each pack was coded by two independent coders, with consistency of personnel across the project. We routinely measured intercoder reliability, and only retained variables for which a good level of reliability was achieved. Variables where reliability was too low were not included in final analyses, and any inconsistencies in coding were resolved on a daily basis. CONCLUSIONS: Across the 14 countries, the TPackSS team collected 3307 tobacco packs. We have established a publicly accessible, Internet archive of these packs that is intended for use by the tobacco control policy advocacy and research community.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4869212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48692122016-05-25 The Tobacco Pack Surveillance System: A Protocol for Assessing Health Warning Compliance, Design Features, and Appeals of Tobacco Packs Sold in Low- and Middle-Income Countries Smith, Katherine Washington, Carmen Brown, Jennifer Vadnais, Alison Kroart, Laura Ferguson, Jacqueline Cohen, Joanna JMIR Public Health Surveill Protocol BACKGROUND: Tobacco remains the world’s leading preventable cause of death, with the majority of tobacco-caused deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries. The first global health treaty, the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), outlines a set of policy initiatives that have been demonstrated as effective in reducing tobacco use. Article 11 of the FCTC focuses on using the tobacco package to communicate tobacco-caused harms; it also seeks to restrict the delivery of misleading information about the product on the pack. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to establish a surveillance system for tobacco packs in the 14 low- and middle-income countries with the greatest number of smokers. The Tobacco Pack Surveillance System (TPackSS) monitors whether required health warnings on tobacco packages are being implemented as intended, and identifies pack designs and appeals that might violate or detract from the communication of harm-related information and undermine the impact of a country’s tobacco packaging laws. The protocol outlined is intended to be applicable or adaptable for surveillance efforts in other countries. METHODS: Tobacco packs were collected in 14 countries during 2013. The intention was, to the extent possible, to construct a census of “unique” pack presentations available for purchase in each country. The TPackSS team partnered with in-country field staff to implement a standardized protocol for acquiring packs from 36 diverse neighborhoods across three cities in each country. At the time of purchase, data on price and place of acquisition of each pack was recorded. The field staff, according to a standardized protocol, then photographed packs before they were shipped to the United States for coding and archiving. RESULTS: Each pack was coded for compliance with the country-specific health warning label laws, as well as for key design features of the pack and appeals of the branding elements. The coding protocols were developed based upon prior research, expert opinion, and communication theories. Each pack was coded by two independent coders, with consistency of personnel across the project. We routinely measured intercoder reliability, and only retained variables for which a good level of reliability was achieved. Variables where reliability was too low were not included in final analyses, and any inconsistencies in coding were resolved on a daily basis. CONCLUSIONS: Across the 14 countries, the TPackSS team collected 3307 tobacco packs. We have established a publicly accessible, Internet archive of these packs that is intended for use by the tobacco control policy advocacy and research community. JMIR Publications 2015-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4869212/ /pubmed/27227142 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.4616 Text en ©Katherine Smith, Carmen Washington, Jennifer Brown, Alison Vadnais, Laura Kroart, Jacqueline Ferguson, Joanna Cohen. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (http://publichealth.jmir.org), 12.08.2015. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Smith, Katherine
Washington, Carmen
Brown, Jennifer
Vadnais, Alison
Kroart, Laura
Ferguson, Jacqueline
Cohen, Joanna
The Tobacco Pack Surveillance System: A Protocol for Assessing Health Warning Compliance, Design Features, and Appeals of Tobacco Packs Sold in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
title The Tobacco Pack Surveillance System: A Protocol for Assessing Health Warning Compliance, Design Features, and Appeals of Tobacco Packs Sold in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
title_full The Tobacco Pack Surveillance System: A Protocol for Assessing Health Warning Compliance, Design Features, and Appeals of Tobacco Packs Sold in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
title_fullStr The Tobacco Pack Surveillance System: A Protocol for Assessing Health Warning Compliance, Design Features, and Appeals of Tobacco Packs Sold in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
title_full_unstemmed The Tobacco Pack Surveillance System: A Protocol for Assessing Health Warning Compliance, Design Features, and Appeals of Tobacco Packs Sold in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
title_short The Tobacco Pack Surveillance System: A Protocol for Assessing Health Warning Compliance, Design Features, and Appeals of Tobacco Packs Sold in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
title_sort tobacco pack surveillance system: a protocol for assessing health warning compliance, design features, and appeals of tobacco packs sold in low- and middle-income countries
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27227142
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.4616
work_keys_str_mv AT smithkatherine thetobaccopacksurveillancesystemaprotocolforassessinghealthwarningcompliancedesignfeaturesandappealsoftobaccopackssoldinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT washingtoncarmen thetobaccopacksurveillancesystemaprotocolforassessinghealthwarningcompliancedesignfeaturesandappealsoftobaccopackssoldinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT brownjennifer thetobaccopacksurveillancesystemaprotocolforassessinghealthwarningcompliancedesignfeaturesandappealsoftobaccopackssoldinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT vadnaisalison thetobaccopacksurveillancesystemaprotocolforassessinghealthwarningcompliancedesignfeaturesandappealsoftobaccopackssoldinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT kroartlaura thetobaccopacksurveillancesystemaprotocolforassessinghealthwarningcompliancedesignfeaturesandappealsoftobaccopackssoldinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT fergusonjacqueline thetobaccopacksurveillancesystemaprotocolforassessinghealthwarningcompliancedesignfeaturesandappealsoftobaccopackssoldinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT cohenjoanna thetobaccopacksurveillancesystemaprotocolforassessinghealthwarningcompliancedesignfeaturesandappealsoftobaccopackssoldinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT smithkatherine tobaccopacksurveillancesystemaprotocolforassessinghealthwarningcompliancedesignfeaturesandappealsoftobaccopackssoldinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT washingtoncarmen tobaccopacksurveillancesystemaprotocolforassessinghealthwarningcompliancedesignfeaturesandappealsoftobaccopackssoldinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT brownjennifer tobaccopacksurveillancesystemaprotocolforassessinghealthwarningcompliancedesignfeaturesandappealsoftobaccopackssoldinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT vadnaisalison tobaccopacksurveillancesystemaprotocolforassessinghealthwarningcompliancedesignfeaturesandappealsoftobaccopackssoldinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT kroartlaura tobaccopacksurveillancesystemaprotocolforassessinghealthwarningcompliancedesignfeaturesandappealsoftobaccopackssoldinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT fergusonjacqueline tobaccopacksurveillancesystemaprotocolforassessinghealthwarningcompliancedesignfeaturesandappealsoftobaccopackssoldinlowandmiddleincomecountries
AT cohenjoanna tobaccopacksurveillancesystemaprotocolforassessinghealthwarningcompliancedesignfeaturesandappealsoftobaccopackssoldinlowandmiddleincomecountries