Cargando…
Electronic Cigarette Marketing Online: a Multi-Site, Multi-Product Comparison
BACKGROUND: Electronic cigarette awareness and use has been increasing rapidly. E-cigarette brands have utilized social networking sites to promote their products, as the growth of the e-cigarette industry has paralleled that of Web 2.0. These online platforms are cost-effective and have unique tech...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27227129 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.4777 |
_version_ | 1782432276708065280 |
---|---|
author | Chu, Kar-Hai Sidhu, Anupreet K Valente, Thomas W |
author_facet | Chu, Kar-Hai Sidhu, Anupreet K Valente, Thomas W |
author_sort | Chu, Kar-Hai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Electronic cigarette awareness and use has been increasing rapidly. E-cigarette brands have utilized social networking sites to promote their products, as the growth of the e-cigarette industry has paralleled that of Web 2.0. These online platforms are cost-effective and have unique technological features and user demographics that can be attractive for selective marketing. The popularity of multiple sites also poses a risk of exposure to social networks where e-cigarette brands might not have a presence. OBJECTIVE: To examine the marketing strategies of leading e-cigarette brands on multiple social networking sites, and to identify how affordances of the digital media are used to their advantage. Secondary analyses include determining if any brands are benefitting from site demographics, and exploring cross-site diffusion of marketing content through multi-site users. METHODS: We collected data from two e-cigarette brands from four social networking sites over approximately 2.5 years. Content analysis is used to search for themes, population targeting, marketing strategies, and cross-site spread of messages. RESULTS: Twitter appeared to be the most frequently used social networking site for interacting directly with product users. Facebook supported informational broadcasts, such as announcements regarding political legislation. E-cigarette brands also differed in their approaches to their users, from informal conversations to direct product marketing. CONCLUSIONS: E-cigarette makers use different strategies to market their product and engage their users. There was no evidence of direct targeting of vulnerable populations, but the affordances of the different sites are exploited to best broadcast context-specific messages. We developed a viable method to study cross-site diffusion, although additional refinement is needed to account for how different types of digital media are used. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4869220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48692202016-05-25 Electronic Cigarette Marketing Online: a Multi-Site, Multi-Product Comparison Chu, Kar-Hai Sidhu, Anupreet K Valente, Thomas W JMIR Public Health Surveill Original Paper BACKGROUND: Electronic cigarette awareness and use has been increasing rapidly. E-cigarette brands have utilized social networking sites to promote their products, as the growth of the e-cigarette industry has paralleled that of Web 2.0. These online platforms are cost-effective and have unique technological features and user demographics that can be attractive for selective marketing. The popularity of multiple sites also poses a risk of exposure to social networks where e-cigarette brands might not have a presence. OBJECTIVE: To examine the marketing strategies of leading e-cigarette brands on multiple social networking sites, and to identify how affordances of the digital media are used to their advantage. Secondary analyses include determining if any brands are benefitting from site demographics, and exploring cross-site diffusion of marketing content through multi-site users. METHODS: We collected data from two e-cigarette brands from four social networking sites over approximately 2.5 years. Content analysis is used to search for themes, population targeting, marketing strategies, and cross-site spread of messages. RESULTS: Twitter appeared to be the most frequently used social networking site for interacting directly with product users. Facebook supported informational broadcasts, such as announcements regarding political legislation. E-cigarette brands also differed in their approaches to their users, from informal conversations to direct product marketing. CONCLUSIONS: E-cigarette makers use different strategies to market their product and engage their users. There was no evidence of direct targeting of vulnerable populations, but the affordances of the different sites are exploited to best broadcast context-specific messages. We developed a viable method to study cross-site diffusion, although additional refinement is needed to account for how different types of digital media are used. JMIR Publications 2015-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4869220/ /pubmed/27227129 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.4777 Text en ©Kar-Hai Chu, Anupreet K Sidhu, Thomas W Valente. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (http://publichealth.jmir.org), 11.09.2015. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Chu, Kar-Hai Sidhu, Anupreet K Valente, Thomas W Electronic Cigarette Marketing Online: a Multi-Site, Multi-Product Comparison |
title | Electronic Cigarette Marketing Online: a Multi-Site, Multi-Product Comparison |
title_full | Electronic Cigarette Marketing Online: a Multi-Site, Multi-Product Comparison |
title_fullStr | Electronic Cigarette Marketing Online: a Multi-Site, Multi-Product Comparison |
title_full_unstemmed | Electronic Cigarette Marketing Online: a Multi-Site, Multi-Product Comparison |
title_short | Electronic Cigarette Marketing Online: a Multi-Site, Multi-Product Comparison |
title_sort | electronic cigarette marketing online: a multi-site, multi-product comparison |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27227129 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.4777 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chukarhai electroniccigarettemarketingonlineamultisitemultiproductcomparison AT sidhuanupreetk electroniccigarettemarketingonlineamultisitemultiproductcomparison AT valentethomasw electroniccigarettemarketingonlineamultisitemultiproductcomparison |