Cargando…

A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

BACKGROUND: In 2009, Damschroder et al. developed the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), which provides a comprehensive listing of constructs thought to influence implementation. This systematic review assesses the extent to which the CFIR’s use in implementation research ful...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirk, M. Alexis, Kelley, Caitlin, Yankey, Nicholas, Birken, Sarah A., Abadie, Brenton, Damschroder, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27189233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z
_version_ 1782432296534540288
author Kirk, M. Alexis
Kelley, Caitlin
Yankey, Nicholas
Birken, Sarah A.
Abadie, Brenton
Damschroder, Laura
author_facet Kirk, M. Alexis
Kelley, Caitlin
Yankey, Nicholas
Birken, Sarah A.
Abadie, Brenton
Damschroder, Laura
author_sort Kirk, M. Alexis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2009, Damschroder et al. developed the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), which provides a comprehensive listing of constructs thought to influence implementation. This systematic review assesses the extent to which the CFIR’s use in implementation research fulfills goals set forth by Damschroder et al. in terms of breadth of use, depth of application, and contribution to implementation research. METHODS: We searched Scopus and Web of Science for publications that cited the original CFIR publication by Damschroder et al. (Implement Sci 4:50, 2009) and downloaded each unique result for review. After applying exclusion criteria, the final articles were empirical studies published in peer-review journals that used the CFIR in a meaningful way (i.e., used the CFIR to guide data collection, measurement, coding, analysis, and/or reporting). A framework analysis approach was used to guide abstraction and synthesis of the included articles. RESULTS: Twenty-six of 429 unique articles (6 %) met inclusion criteria. We found great breadth in CFIR application; the CFIR was applied across a wide variety of study objectives, settings, and units of analysis. There was also variation in the method of included studies (mixed methods (n = 13); qualitative (n = 10); quantitative (n = 3)). Depth of CFIR application revealed some areas for improvement. Few studies (n = 3) reported justification for selection of CFIR constructs used; the majority of studies (n = 14) used the CFIR to guide data analysis only; and few studies investigated any outcomes (n = 11). Finally, reflections on the contribution of the CFIR to implementation research were scarce. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the CFIR has been used across a wide range of studies, though more in-depth use of the CFIR may help advance implementation science. To harness its potential, researchers should consider how to most meaningfully use the CFIR. Specific recommendations for applying the CFIR include explicitly justifying selection of CFIR constructs; integrating the CFIR throughout the research process (in study design, data collection, and analysis); and appropriately using the CFIR given the phase of implementation of the research (e.g., if the research is post-implementation, using the CFIR to link determinants of implementation to outcomes). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4869309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48693092016-05-18 A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research Kirk, M. Alexis Kelley, Caitlin Yankey, Nicholas Birken, Sarah A. Abadie, Brenton Damschroder, Laura Implement Sci Systematic Review BACKGROUND: In 2009, Damschroder et al. developed the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), which provides a comprehensive listing of constructs thought to influence implementation. This systematic review assesses the extent to which the CFIR’s use in implementation research fulfills goals set forth by Damschroder et al. in terms of breadth of use, depth of application, and contribution to implementation research. METHODS: We searched Scopus and Web of Science for publications that cited the original CFIR publication by Damschroder et al. (Implement Sci 4:50, 2009) and downloaded each unique result for review. After applying exclusion criteria, the final articles were empirical studies published in peer-review journals that used the CFIR in a meaningful way (i.e., used the CFIR to guide data collection, measurement, coding, analysis, and/or reporting). A framework analysis approach was used to guide abstraction and synthesis of the included articles. RESULTS: Twenty-six of 429 unique articles (6 %) met inclusion criteria. We found great breadth in CFIR application; the CFIR was applied across a wide variety of study objectives, settings, and units of analysis. There was also variation in the method of included studies (mixed methods (n = 13); qualitative (n = 10); quantitative (n = 3)). Depth of CFIR application revealed some areas for improvement. Few studies (n = 3) reported justification for selection of CFIR constructs used; the majority of studies (n = 14) used the CFIR to guide data analysis only; and few studies investigated any outcomes (n = 11). Finally, reflections on the contribution of the CFIR to implementation research were scarce. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the CFIR has been used across a wide range of studies, though more in-depth use of the CFIR may help advance implementation science. To harness its potential, researchers should consider how to most meaningfully use the CFIR. Specific recommendations for applying the CFIR include explicitly justifying selection of CFIR constructs; integrating the CFIR throughout the research process (in study design, data collection, and analysis); and appropriately using the CFIR given the phase of implementation of the research (e.g., if the research is post-implementation, using the CFIR to link determinants of implementation to outcomes). ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4869309/ /pubmed/27189233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z Text en © Kirk et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Kirk, M. Alexis
Kelley, Caitlin
Yankey, Nicholas
Birken, Sarah A.
Abadie, Brenton
Damschroder, Laura
A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
title A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
title_full A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
title_fullStr A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
title_short A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
title_sort systematic review of the use of the consolidated framework for implementation research
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27189233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kirkmalexis asystematicreviewoftheuseoftheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearch
AT kelleycaitlin asystematicreviewoftheuseoftheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearch
AT yankeynicholas asystematicreviewoftheuseoftheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearch
AT birkensaraha asystematicreviewoftheuseoftheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearch
AT abadiebrenton asystematicreviewoftheuseoftheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearch
AT damschroderlaura asystematicreviewoftheuseoftheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearch
AT kirkmalexis systematicreviewoftheuseoftheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearch
AT kelleycaitlin systematicreviewoftheuseoftheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearch
AT yankeynicholas systematicreviewoftheuseoftheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearch
AT birkensaraha systematicreviewoftheuseoftheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearch
AT abadiebrenton systematicreviewoftheuseoftheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearch
AT damschroderlaura systematicreviewoftheuseoftheconsolidatedframeworkforimplementationresearch