Cargando…
What proportion of Salmonella Typhi cases are detected by blood culture? A systematic literature review
Blood culture is often used in definitive diagnosis of typhoid fever while, bone marrow culture has a greater sensitivity and considered reference standard. The sensitivity of blood culture measured against bone marrow culture results in measurement bias because both tests are not fully sensitive. H...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27188991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-016-0147-z |
_version_ | 1782432298809950208 |
---|---|
author | Mogasale, Vittal Ramani, Enusa Mogasale, Vijayalaxmi V. Park, JuYeon |
author_facet | Mogasale, Vittal Ramani, Enusa Mogasale, Vijayalaxmi V. Park, JuYeon |
author_sort | Mogasale, Vittal |
collection | PubMed |
description | Blood culture is often used in definitive diagnosis of typhoid fever while, bone marrow culture has a greater sensitivity and considered reference standard. The sensitivity of blood culture measured against bone marrow culture results in measurement bias because both tests are not fully sensitive. Here we propose a combination of the two cultures as a reference to define true positive S. Typhi cases. Based on a systematic literature review, we identified ten papers that had performed blood and bone marrow culture for S. Typhi in same subjects. We estimated the weighted mean of proportion of cases detected by culture measured against true S. Typhi positive cases using a random effects model. Of 529 true positive S. Typhi cases, 61 % (95 % CI 52–70 %) and 96 % (95 % CI 93–99 %) were detected by blood and bone marrow cultures respectively. Blood culture sensitivity was 66 % (95 % CI 56–75 %) when compared with bone marrow culture results. The use of blood culture sensitivity as a proxy measure to estimate the proportion of typhoid fever cases detected by blood culture is likely to be an underestimate. As blood culture sensitivity is used as a correction factor in estimating typhoid disease burden, epidemiologists and policy makers should account for the underestimation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4869319 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48693192016-05-18 What proportion of Salmonella Typhi cases are detected by blood culture? A systematic literature review Mogasale, Vittal Ramani, Enusa Mogasale, Vijayalaxmi V. Park, JuYeon Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob Review Blood culture is often used in definitive diagnosis of typhoid fever while, bone marrow culture has a greater sensitivity and considered reference standard. The sensitivity of blood culture measured against bone marrow culture results in measurement bias because both tests are not fully sensitive. Here we propose a combination of the two cultures as a reference to define true positive S. Typhi cases. Based on a systematic literature review, we identified ten papers that had performed blood and bone marrow culture for S. Typhi in same subjects. We estimated the weighted mean of proportion of cases detected by culture measured against true S. Typhi positive cases using a random effects model. Of 529 true positive S. Typhi cases, 61 % (95 % CI 52–70 %) and 96 % (95 % CI 93–99 %) were detected by blood and bone marrow cultures respectively. Blood culture sensitivity was 66 % (95 % CI 56–75 %) when compared with bone marrow culture results. The use of blood culture sensitivity as a proxy measure to estimate the proportion of typhoid fever cases detected by blood culture is likely to be an underestimate. As blood culture sensitivity is used as a correction factor in estimating typhoid disease burden, epidemiologists and policy makers should account for the underestimation. BioMed Central 2016-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4869319/ /pubmed/27188991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-016-0147-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Mogasale, Vittal Ramani, Enusa Mogasale, Vijayalaxmi V. Park, JuYeon What proportion of Salmonella Typhi cases are detected by blood culture? A systematic literature review |
title | What proportion of Salmonella Typhi cases are detected by blood culture? A systematic literature review |
title_full | What proportion of Salmonella Typhi cases are detected by blood culture? A systematic literature review |
title_fullStr | What proportion of Salmonella Typhi cases are detected by blood culture? A systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | What proportion of Salmonella Typhi cases are detected by blood culture? A systematic literature review |
title_short | What proportion of Salmonella Typhi cases are detected by blood culture? A systematic literature review |
title_sort | what proportion of salmonella typhi cases are detected by blood culture? a systematic literature review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27188991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12941-016-0147-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mogasalevittal whatproportionofsalmonellatyphicasesaredetectedbybloodcultureasystematicliteraturereview AT ramanienusa whatproportionofsalmonellatyphicasesaredetectedbybloodcultureasystematicliteraturereview AT mogasalevijayalaxmiv whatproportionofsalmonellatyphicasesaredetectedbybloodcultureasystematicliteraturereview AT parkjuyeon whatproportionofsalmonellatyphicasesaredetectedbybloodcultureasystematicliteraturereview |