Cargando…

Critiquing the response to the Ebola epidemic through a Primary Health Care Approach

BACKGROUND: The 2014/2015 West Africa Ebola epidemic has caused the global public health community to engage in difficult self-reflection. First, it must consider the part it played in relation to an important public health question: why did this epidemic take hold and spread in this unprecedented m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scott, Vera, Crawford-Browne, Sarah, Sanders, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27185252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3071-4
_version_ 1782432299260837888
author Scott, Vera
Crawford-Browne, Sarah
Sanders, David
author_facet Scott, Vera
Crawford-Browne, Sarah
Sanders, David
author_sort Scott, Vera
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The 2014/2015 West Africa Ebola epidemic has caused the global public health community to engage in difficult self-reflection. First, it must consider the part it played in relation to an important public health question: why did this epidemic take hold and spread in this unprecedented manner? Second, it must use the lessons learnt to answer the subsequent question: what can be done now to prevent further such outbreaks in the future? These questions remain relevant, even as scientists announce that the Guinea Phase III efficacy vaccine trial shows that rVSV-EBOV (Merck, Sharp & Dohme) is highly efficacious in individuals. This is a major breakthrough in the fight against Ebola virus disease (EVD). It does not replace but may be a powerful adjunct to current strategies of EVD management and control. DISCUSSION: We contribute to the current self-reflection by presenting an analysis using a Primary Health Care (PHC) approach. This approach is appropriate as African countries in the region affected by EVD have recommitted themselves to PHC as a framework for organising health systems and the delivery of health services. The approach suggests that, in an epidemic made complex by weak pre-existing health systems, lack of trust in authorities and mobile populations, a broader approach is required to engage affected communities. In the medium-term health system development with attention to primary level services and community-based programmes to address the major disease burden of malaria, diarrhoeal disease, meningitis, tuberculosis and malnutrition is needed. This requires the development of local management and an investment in human resources for health. Crucially this has to be developed ahead of, and not in parallel with, future outbreaks. In the longer-term a commitment is required to address the underlying social determinants which make these countries so vulnerable, and limit their capacity to respond effectively to, epidemics such as EVD. CONCLUSION: The PHC approach offers an insightful critique of the global and regional factors which have compromised the response of health systems in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone as well as suggesting what a strengthened EVD response might involve in the short, medium and long-term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4869325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48693252016-05-18 Critiquing the response to the Ebola epidemic through a Primary Health Care Approach Scott, Vera Crawford-Browne, Sarah Sanders, David BMC Public Health Debate BACKGROUND: The 2014/2015 West Africa Ebola epidemic has caused the global public health community to engage in difficult self-reflection. First, it must consider the part it played in relation to an important public health question: why did this epidemic take hold and spread in this unprecedented manner? Second, it must use the lessons learnt to answer the subsequent question: what can be done now to prevent further such outbreaks in the future? These questions remain relevant, even as scientists announce that the Guinea Phase III efficacy vaccine trial shows that rVSV-EBOV (Merck, Sharp & Dohme) is highly efficacious in individuals. This is a major breakthrough in the fight against Ebola virus disease (EVD). It does not replace but may be a powerful adjunct to current strategies of EVD management and control. DISCUSSION: We contribute to the current self-reflection by presenting an analysis using a Primary Health Care (PHC) approach. This approach is appropriate as African countries in the region affected by EVD have recommitted themselves to PHC as a framework for organising health systems and the delivery of health services. The approach suggests that, in an epidemic made complex by weak pre-existing health systems, lack of trust in authorities and mobile populations, a broader approach is required to engage affected communities. In the medium-term health system development with attention to primary level services and community-based programmes to address the major disease burden of malaria, diarrhoeal disease, meningitis, tuberculosis and malnutrition is needed. This requires the development of local management and an investment in human resources for health. Crucially this has to be developed ahead of, and not in parallel with, future outbreaks. In the longer-term a commitment is required to address the underlying social determinants which make these countries so vulnerable, and limit their capacity to respond effectively to, epidemics such as EVD. CONCLUSION: The PHC approach offers an insightful critique of the global and regional factors which have compromised the response of health systems in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone as well as suggesting what a strengthened EVD response might involve in the short, medium and long-term. BioMed Central 2016-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4869325/ /pubmed/27185252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3071-4 Text en © Scott et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Scott, Vera
Crawford-Browne, Sarah
Sanders, David
Critiquing the response to the Ebola epidemic through a Primary Health Care Approach
title Critiquing the response to the Ebola epidemic through a Primary Health Care Approach
title_full Critiquing the response to the Ebola epidemic through a Primary Health Care Approach
title_fullStr Critiquing the response to the Ebola epidemic through a Primary Health Care Approach
title_full_unstemmed Critiquing the response to the Ebola epidemic through a Primary Health Care Approach
title_short Critiquing the response to the Ebola epidemic through a Primary Health Care Approach
title_sort critiquing the response to the ebola epidemic through a primary health care approach
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27185252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3071-4
work_keys_str_mv AT scottvera critiquingtheresponsetotheebolaepidemicthroughaprimaryhealthcareapproach
AT crawfordbrownesarah critiquingtheresponsetotheebolaepidemicthroughaprimaryhealthcareapproach
AT sandersdavid critiquingtheresponsetotheebolaepidemicthroughaprimaryhealthcareapproach