Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight infants: multicenter pre-post cohort study
BACKGROUND: There have been many studies supporting fluconazole prophylaxis in preterm infants for prevention of invasive fungal infections (IFIs). However, the routine use of fluconazole prophylaxis in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) raises concerns with respect to resistance development, inc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27184665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0605-y |
_version_ | 1782432307076923392 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Juyoung Kim, Han-Suk Shin, Seung Han Choi, Chang Won Kim, Ee-Kyung Choi, Eun Hwa Kim, Beyong Il Choi, Jung-Hwan |
author_facet | Lee, Juyoung Kim, Han-Suk Shin, Seung Han Choi, Chang Won Kim, Ee-Kyung Choi, Eun Hwa Kim, Beyong Il Choi, Jung-Hwan |
author_sort | Lee, Juyoung |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There have been many studies supporting fluconazole prophylaxis in preterm infants for prevention of invasive fungal infections (IFIs). However, the routine use of fluconazole prophylaxis in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) raises concerns with respect to resistance development, including the selection of resistant Candida species. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. METHODS: An interventional pre-post cohort study at two tertiary NICUs was conducted. Data from two 5-year periods with and without fluconazole prophylaxis (Mar 2008–Feb 2013 and Mar 2003–Feb 2008) was compared. Prophylactic fluconazole was administered starting on the 3rd day at a dose of 3 mg/kg twice a week for 4 weeks during the prophylaxis period. RESULTS: The fluconazole prophylaxis group consisted of 264 infants, and the non-prophylaxis group consisted of 159 infants. IFI occurred in a total of 19 neonates (4.7 %) during the 10-year study period. Fluconazole prophylaxis lower the fungal colonization rate significantly (59.1 % vs. 33.9 %, P <0.001). However, the incidence of IFIs in ELBW infants was not reduced after fluconazole prophylaxis (4.4 % vs. 5.5 %, P = 0.80). Rather, although the increase did not reach statistical significance, fluconazole prophylaxis tended to increase the incidence of invasive infections involving fluconazole-resistant C. parapsilosis (0 % vs. 41.7 %, P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Fluconazole prophylaxis was not efficacious in decreasing IFIs in ELBW infants. There is a need for targeting prophylaxis to greatest risk population and prospective studies to measure the long-term effect of fluconazole prophylaxis on the emergence of organisms with antifungal resistance. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-016-0605-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4869366 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48693662016-05-18 Efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight infants: multicenter pre-post cohort study Lee, Juyoung Kim, Han-Suk Shin, Seung Han Choi, Chang Won Kim, Ee-Kyung Choi, Eun Hwa Kim, Beyong Il Choi, Jung-Hwan BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: There have been many studies supporting fluconazole prophylaxis in preterm infants for prevention of invasive fungal infections (IFIs). However, the routine use of fluconazole prophylaxis in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) raises concerns with respect to resistance development, including the selection of resistant Candida species. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. METHODS: An interventional pre-post cohort study at two tertiary NICUs was conducted. Data from two 5-year periods with and without fluconazole prophylaxis (Mar 2008–Feb 2013 and Mar 2003–Feb 2008) was compared. Prophylactic fluconazole was administered starting on the 3rd day at a dose of 3 mg/kg twice a week for 4 weeks during the prophylaxis period. RESULTS: The fluconazole prophylaxis group consisted of 264 infants, and the non-prophylaxis group consisted of 159 infants. IFI occurred in a total of 19 neonates (4.7 %) during the 10-year study period. Fluconazole prophylaxis lower the fungal colonization rate significantly (59.1 % vs. 33.9 %, P <0.001). However, the incidence of IFIs in ELBW infants was not reduced after fluconazole prophylaxis (4.4 % vs. 5.5 %, P = 0.80). Rather, although the increase did not reach statistical significance, fluconazole prophylaxis tended to increase the incidence of invasive infections involving fluconazole-resistant C. parapsilosis (0 % vs. 41.7 %, P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Fluconazole prophylaxis was not efficacious in decreasing IFIs in ELBW infants. There is a need for targeting prophylaxis to greatest risk population and prospective studies to measure the long-term effect of fluconazole prophylaxis on the emergence of organisms with antifungal resistance. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-016-0605-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4869366/ /pubmed/27184665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0605-y Text en © Lee et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lee, Juyoung Kim, Han-Suk Shin, Seung Han Choi, Chang Won Kim, Ee-Kyung Choi, Eun Hwa Kim, Beyong Il Choi, Jung-Hwan Efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight infants: multicenter pre-post cohort study |
title | Efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight infants: multicenter pre-post cohort study |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight infants: multicenter pre-post cohort study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight infants: multicenter pre-post cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight infants: multicenter pre-post cohort study |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight infants: multicenter pre-post cohort study |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of fluconazole prophylaxis in extremely low birth weight infants: multicenter pre-post cohort study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27184665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0605-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejuyoung efficacyandsafetyoffluconazoleprophylaxisinextremelylowbirthweightinfantsmulticenterprepostcohortstudy AT kimhansuk efficacyandsafetyoffluconazoleprophylaxisinextremelylowbirthweightinfantsmulticenterprepostcohortstudy AT shinseunghan efficacyandsafetyoffluconazoleprophylaxisinextremelylowbirthweightinfantsmulticenterprepostcohortstudy AT choichangwon efficacyandsafetyoffluconazoleprophylaxisinextremelylowbirthweightinfantsmulticenterprepostcohortstudy AT kimeekyung efficacyandsafetyoffluconazoleprophylaxisinextremelylowbirthweightinfantsmulticenterprepostcohortstudy AT choieunhwa efficacyandsafetyoffluconazoleprophylaxisinextremelylowbirthweightinfantsmulticenterprepostcohortstudy AT kimbeyongil efficacyandsafetyoffluconazoleprophylaxisinextremelylowbirthweightinfantsmulticenterprepostcohortstudy AT choijunghwan efficacyandsafetyoffluconazoleprophylaxisinextremelylowbirthweightinfantsmulticenterprepostcohortstudy |