Cargando…

Electronic cigarettes: a survey of perceived patient use and attitudes among members of the British thoracic oncology group

BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation following lung cancer diagnosis has been found to improve several patient outcomes. Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use is now prevalent within Great Britain, however, use and practice among patients with lung cancer has not as yet been explored. The current study ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sherratt, Frances C., Newson, Lisa, Field, John K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27184050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-016-0367-y
_version_ 1782432309413150720
author Sherratt, Frances C.
Newson, Lisa
Field, John K.
author_facet Sherratt, Frances C.
Newson, Lisa
Field, John K.
author_sort Sherratt, Frances C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation following lung cancer diagnosis has been found to improve several patient outcomes. Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use is now prevalent within Great Britain, however, use and practice among patients with lung cancer has not as yet been explored. The current study aims to explore e-cigarette use among patients and examine current practice among clinicians. The results have important implications for future policy and practice. METHODS: Members of The British Thoracic Oncology Group (BTOG) were contacted via several e-circulations (N = 2,009), requesting them to complete an online survey. Of these, 7.7 % (N = 154) completed the survey, which explored participant demographics and smoking history, perceptions of patient e-cigarette use, practitioner knowledge regarding sources of guidance pertaining to e-cigarettes, and practitioner advice. RESULTS: Practitioners frequently observed e-cigarette use among patients with lung cancer. The majority of practitioners (81.4 %) reported responding to patient queries pertaining to e-cigarettes within the past year; however, far fewer (21.0 %) felt confident providing patients with e-cigarette advice. Practitioner confidence was found to differentiate by gender (p = 0.012) and employment speciality (p = 0.030), with nurses reporting particularly low levels of confidence in advising. The results also demonstrate extensive variability regarding the practitioner advice content. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that patients refer to practitioners as a source of e-cigarette guidance, yet few practitioners feel confident advising. The absence of evidence-based guidance may have contributed towards the exhibited inconsistencies in practitioner advice. The findings highlight that training should be delivered to equip practitioners with the knowledge and confidence to advise patients effectively; this could subsequently improve smoking cessation rates and patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4869376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48693762016-05-18 Electronic cigarettes: a survey of perceived patient use and attitudes among members of the British thoracic oncology group Sherratt, Frances C. Newson, Lisa Field, John K. Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation following lung cancer diagnosis has been found to improve several patient outcomes. Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use is now prevalent within Great Britain, however, use and practice among patients with lung cancer has not as yet been explored. The current study aims to explore e-cigarette use among patients and examine current practice among clinicians. The results have important implications for future policy and practice. METHODS: Members of The British Thoracic Oncology Group (BTOG) were contacted via several e-circulations (N = 2,009), requesting them to complete an online survey. Of these, 7.7 % (N = 154) completed the survey, which explored participant demographics and smoking history, perceptions of patient e-cigarette use, practitioner knowledge regarding sources of guidance pertaining to e-cigarettes, and practitioner advice. RESULTS: Practitioners frequently observed e-cigarette use among patients with lung cancer. The majority of practitioners (81.4 %) reported responding to patient queries pertaining to e-cigarettes within the past year; however, far fewer (21.0 %) felt confident providing patients with e-cigarette advice. Practitioner confidence was found to differentiate by gender (p = 0.012) and employment speciality (p = 0.030), with nurses reporting particularly low levels of confidence in advising. The results also demonstrate extensive variability regarding the practitioner advice content. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that patients refer to practitioners as a source of e-cigarette guidance, yet few practitioners feel confident advising. The absence of evidence-based guidance may have contributed towards the exhibited inconsistencies in practitioner advice. The findings highlight that training should be delivered to equip practitioners with the knowledge and confidence to advise patients effectively; this could subsequently improve smoking cessation rates and patient outcomes. BioMed Central 2016-05-17 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4869376/ /pubmed/27184050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-016-0367-y Text en © Sherratt et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Sherratt, Frances C.
Newson, Lisa
Field, John K.
Electronic cigarettes: a survey of perceived patient use and attitudes among members of the British thoracic oncology group
title Electronic cigarettes: a survey of perceived patient use and attitudes among members of the British thoracic oncology group
title_full Electronic cigarettes: a survey of perceived patient use and attitudes among members of the British thoracic oncology group
title_fullStr Electronic cigarettes: a survey of perceived patient use and attitudes among members of the British thoracic oncology group
title_full_unstemmed Electronic cigarettes: a survey of perceived patient use and attitudes among members of the British thoracic oncology group
title_short Electronic cigarettes: a survey of perceived patient use and attitudes among members of the British thoracic oncology group
title_sort electronic cigarettes: a survey of perceived patient use and attitudes among members of the british thoracic oncology group
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27184050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-016-0367-y
work_keys_str_mv AT sherrattfrancesc electroniccigarettesasurveyofperceivedpatientuseandattitudesamongmembersofthebritishthoraciconcologygroup
AT newsonlisa electroniccigarettesasurveyofperceivedpatientuseandattitudesamongmembersofthebritishthoraciconcologygroup
AT fieldjohnk electroniccigarettesasurveyofperceivedpatientuseandattitudesamongmembersofthebritishthoraciconcologygroup