Cargando…

Evaluation of success after second Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of the second Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) surgery in eyes with failed previous AGV surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following chart review, 36 eyes of 34 patients with second AGV implantation were enrolled in this study. The primary ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nilforushan, Naveed, Yadgari, Maryam, Jazayeri, Anis Alsadat, Karimi, Nasser
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27146930
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.181740
_version_ 1782432328466825216
author Nilforushan, Naveed
Yadgari, Maryam
Jazayeri, Anis Alsadat
Karimi, Nasser
author_facet Nilforushan, Naveed
Yadgari, Maryam
Jazayeri, Anis Alsadat
Karimi, Nasser
author_sort Nilforushan, Naveed
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of the second Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) surgery in eyes with failed previous AGV surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following chart review, 36 eyes of 34 patients with second AGV implantation were enrolled in this study. The primary outcome measure was surgical success defined in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) control using two criteria: Success was defined as IOP ≤21 mmHg (criterion 1) and IOP ≤16 mmHg (criterion 2), with at least 20% reduction in IOP, either with no medication (complete success) or with no more than two medications (qualified success). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to determine the probability of surgical success. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 32.7 years (range 4–65), and the mean duration of follow-up was 21.4 months (range 6–96). Preoperatively, the mean IOP was 26.94 mmHg (standard deviation [SD] 7.03), and the patients were using 2.8 glaucoma medications on average (SD 0.9). The mean IOP decreased significantly to 13.28 mmHg (SD 3.59) at the last postoperative visit (P = 0.00) while the patients needed even fewer glaucoma medications on average (1.4 ± 1.1, P = 0.00). Surgical success of second glaucoma drainage devices (Kaplan–Meier analysis), according to criterion 1, at 6, 12, 18, and 42 months was 94%, 85%, 80%, and 53% respectively, and according to criterion 2, was 94%, 85%, 75%, and 45%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Repeated AGV implantation seems to be a safe modality of treatment with acceptable success rate in cases with failed previous AGV surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4869458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48694582016-05-20 Evaluation of success after second Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation Nilforushan, Naveed Yadgari, Maryam Jazayeri, Anis Alsadat Karimi, Nasser Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of the second Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) surgery in eyes with failed previous AGV surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following chart review, 36 eyes of 34 patients with second AGV implantation were enrolled in this study. The primary outcome measure was surgical success defined in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) control using two criteria: Success was defined as IOP ≤21 mmHg (criterion 1) and IOP ≤16 mmHg (criterion 2), with at least 20% reduction in IOP, either with no medication (complete success) or with no more than two medications (qualified success). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to determine the probability of surgical success. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 32.7 years (range 4–65), and the mean duration of follow-up was 21.4 months (range 6–96). Preoperatively, the mean IOP was 26.94 mmHg (standard deviation [SD] 7.03), and the patients were using 2.8 glaucoma medications on average (SD 0.9). The mean IOP decreased significantly to 13.28 mmHg (SD 3.59) at the last postoperative visit (P = 0.00) while the patients needed even fewer glaucoma medications on average (1.4 ± 1.1, P = 0.00). Surgical success of second glaucoma drainage devices (Kaplan–Meier analysis), according to criterion 1, at 6, 12, 18, and 42 months was 94%, 85%, 80%, and 53% respectively, and according to criterion 2, was 94%, 85%, 75%, and 45%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Repeated AGV implantation seems to be a safe modality of treatment with acceptable success rate in cases with failed previous AGV surgery. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4869458/ /pubmed/27146930 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.181740 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nilforushan, Naveed
Yadgari, Maryam
Jazayeri, Anis Alsadat
Karimi, Nasser
Evaluation of success after second Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation
title Evaluation of success after second Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation
title_full Evaluation of success after second Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation
title_fullStr Evaluation of success after second Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of success after second Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation
title_short Evaluation of success after second Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation
title_sort evaluation of success after second ahmed glaucoma valve implantation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27146930
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.181740
work_keys_str_mv AT nilforushannaveed evaluationofsuccessaftersecondahmedglaucomavalveimplantation
AT yadgarimaryam evaluationofsuccessaftersecondahmedglaucomavalveimplantation
AT jazayerianisalsadat evaluationofsuccessaftersecondahmedglaucomavalveimplantation
AT kariminasser evaluationofsuccessaftersecondahmedglaucomavalveimplantation