Cargando…
Evaluation of success after second Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation
PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of the second Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) surgery in eyes with failed previous AGV surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following chart review, 36 eyes of 34 patients with second AGV implantation were enrolled in this study. The primary ou...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27146930 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.181740 |
_version_ | 1782432328466825216 |
---|---|
author | Nilforushan, Naveed Yadgari, Maryam Jazayeri, Anis Alsadat Karimi, Nasser |
author_facet | Nilforushan, Naveed Yadgari, Maryam Jazayeri, Anis Alsadat Karimi, Nasser |
author_sort | Nilforushan, Naveed |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of the second Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) surgery in eyes with failed previous AGV surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following chart review, 36 eyes of 34 patients with second AGV implantation were enrolled in this study. The primary outcome measure was surgical success defined in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) control using two criteria: Success was defined as IOP ≤21 mmHg (criterion 1) and IOP ≤16 mmHg (criterion 2), with at least 20% reduction in IOP, either with no medication (complete success) or with no more than two medications (qualified success). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to determine the probability of surgical success. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 32.7 years (range 4–65), and the mean duration of follow-up was 21.4 months (range 6–96). Preoperatively, the mean IOP was 26.94 mmHg (standard deviation [SD] 7.03), and the patients were using 2.8 glaucoma medications on average (SD 0.9). The mean IOP decreased significantly to 13.28 mmHg (SD 3.59) at the last postoperative visit (P = 0.00) while the patients needed even fewer glaucoma medications on average (1.4 ± 1.1, P = 0.00). Surgical success of second glaucoma drainage devices (Kaplan–Meier analysis), according to criterion 1, at 6, 12, 18, and 42 months was 94%, 85%, 80%, and 53% respectively, and according to criterion 2, was 94%, 85%, 75%, and 45%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Repeated AGV implantation seems to be a safe modality of treatment with acceptable success rate in cases with failed previous AGV surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4869458 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48694582016-05-20 Evaluation of success after second Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation Nilforushan, Naveed Yadgari, Maryam Jazayeri, Anis Alsadat Karimi, Nasser Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of the second Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) surgery in eyes with failed previous AGV surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following chart review, 36 eyes of 34 patients with second AGV implantation were enrolled in this study. The primary outcome measure was surgical success defined in terms of intraocular pressure (IOP) control using two criteria: Success was defined as IOP ≤21 mmHg (criterion 1) and IOP ≤16 mmHg (criterion 2), with at least 20% reduction in IOP, either with no medication (complete success) or with no more than two medications (qualified success). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to determine the probability of surgical success. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 32.7 years (range 4–65), and the mean duration of follow-up was 21.4 months (range 6–96). Preoperatively, the mean IOP was 26.94 mmHg (standard deviation [SD] 7.03), and the patients were using 2.8 glaucoma medications on average (SD 0.9). The mean IOP decreased significantly to 13.28 mmHg (SD 3.59) at the last postoperative visit (P = 0.00) while the patients needed even fewer glaucoma medications on average (1.4 ± 1.1, P = 0.00). Surgical success of second glaucoma drainage devices (Kaplan–Meier analysis), according to criterion 1, at 6, 12, 18, and 42 months was 94%, 85%, 80%, and 53% respectively, and according to criterion 2, was 94%, 85%, 75%, and 45%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Repeated AGV implantation seems to be a safe modality of treatment with acceptable success rate in cases with failed previous AGV surgery. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4869458/ /pubmed/27146930 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.181740 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nilforushan, Naveed Yadgari, Maryam Jazayeri, Anis Alsadat Karimi, Nasser Evaluation of success after second Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation |
title | Evaluation of success after second Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation |
title_full | Evaluation of success after second Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of success after second Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of success after second Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation |
title_short | Evaluation of success after second Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation |
title_sort | evaluation of success after second ahmed glaucoma valve implantation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869458/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27146930 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.181740 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nilforushannaveed evaluationofsuccessaftersecondahmedglaucomavalveimplantation AT yadgarimaryam evaluationofsuccessaftersecondahmedglaucomavalveimplantation AT jazayerianisalsadat evaluationofsuccessaftersecondahmedglaucomavalveimplantation AT kariminasser evaluationofsuccessaftersecondahmedglaucomavalveimplantation |