Cargando…

A randomized, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 μg on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD

BACKGROUND: The combination of the inhaled muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium (UMEC) with the long-acting β(2)-agonist vilanterol (VI) has been shown to provide significant improvements in lung function compared with UMEC, VI, or placebo (PBO) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siler, Thomas M, Donald, Alison C, O’Dell, Dianne, Church, Alison, Fahy, William A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274218
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S102962
_version_ 1782432352144719872
author Siler, Thomas M
Donald, Alison C
O’Dell, Dianne
Church, Alison
Fahy, William A
author_facet Siler, Thomas M
Donald, Alison C
O’Dell, Dianne
Church, Alison
Fahy, William A
author_sort Siler, Thomas M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The combination of the inhaled muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium (UMEC) with the long-acting β(2)-agonist vilanterol (VI) has been shown to provide significant improvements in lung function compared with UMEC, VI, or placebo (PBO) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study was specifically designed to support these findings by assessing health-related quality of life and symptomatic outcomes in a similar population. METHODS: This was a 12-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive once-daily UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg (via ELLIPTA(®) dry powder inhaler) or PBO for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at day 84. Secondary efficacy endpoints included rescue albuterol use (puffs/day) over weeks 1–12 and trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second on day 84. Adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 496 patients were included in the intent-to-treat population in the UMEC/VI (n=248) and PBO (n=248) treatment groups. UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg provided a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in SGRQ total score at day 84 versus PBO (difference between treatments in SGRQ total score change from baseline: −4.03 [95% confidence interval {CI}: −6.28, −1.79]; P<0.001). UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg resulted in a statistically significant reduction in rescue albuterol use versus PBO (−0.7 puffs/day [95% CI: −1.1, −0.4]; P<0.001). UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg provided a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second on day 84 versus PBO (122 mL [95% CI: 71, 172]; P<0.001). The incidence of adverse events was similar between treatments (32% and 30% of patients in the UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg and PBO groups, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that treatment with UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg provides clinically important improvements in SGRQ and rescue medication use versus PBO in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4869636
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48696362016-06-07 A randomized, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 μg on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD Siler, Thomas M Donald, Alison C O’Dell, Dianne Church, Alison Fahy, William A Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: The combination of the inhaled muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium (UMEC) with the long-acting β(2)-agonist vilanterol (VI) has been shown to provide significant improvements in lung function compared with UMEC, VI, or placebo (PBO) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study was specifically designed to support these findings by assessing health-related quality of life and symptomatic outcomes in a similar population. METHODS: This was a 12-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive once-daily UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg (via ELLIPTA(®) dry powder inhaler) or PBO for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at day 84. Secondary efficacy endpoints included rescue albuterol use (puffs/day) over weeks 1–12 and trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second on day 84. Adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 496 patients were included in the intent-to-treat population in the UMEC/VI (n=248) and PBO (n=248) treatment groups. UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg provided a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in SGRQ total score at day 84 versus PBO (difference between treatments in SGRQ total score change from baseline: −4.03 [95% confidence interval {CI}: −6.28, −1.79]; P<0.001). UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg resulted in a statistically significant reduction in rescue albuterol use versus PBO (−0.7 puffs/day [95% CI: −1.1, −0.4]; P<0.001). UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg provided a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second on day 84 versus PBO (122 mL [95% CI: 71, 172]; P<0.001). The incidence of adverse events was similar between treatments (32% and 30% of patients in the UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg and PBO groups, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that treatment with UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg provides clinically important improvements in SGRQ and rescue medication use versus PBO in patients with moderate-to-very-severe COPD. Dove Medical Press 2016-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4869636/ /pubmed/27274218 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S102962 Text en © 2016 Siler et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Siler, Thomas M
Donald, Alison C
O’Dell, Dianne
Church, Alison
Fahy, William A
A randomized, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 μg on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD
title A randomized, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 μg on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD
title_full A randomized, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 μg on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD
title_fullStr A randomized, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 μg on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD
title_full_unstemmed A randomized, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 μg on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD
title_short A randomized, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 μg on health-related quality of life in patients with COPD
title_sort randomized, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 μg on health-related quality of life in patients with copd
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869636/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274218
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S102962
work_keys_str_mv AT silerthomasm arandomizedparallelgroupstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofumeclidiniumvilanterol62525mgonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopd
AT donaldalisonc arandomizedparallelgroupstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofumeclidiniumvilanterol62525mgonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopd
AT odelldianne arandomizedparallelgroupstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofumeclidiniumvilanterol62525mgonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopd
AT churchalison arandomizedparallelgroupstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofumeclidiniumvilanterol62525mgonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopd
AT fahywilliama arandomizedparallelgroupstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofumeclidiniumvilanterol62525mgonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopd
AT silerthomasm randomizedparallelgroupstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofumeclidiniumvilanterol62525mgonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopd
AT donaldalisonc randomizedparallelgroupstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofumeclidiniumvilanterol62525mgonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopd
AT odelldianne randomizedparallelgroupstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofumeclidiniumvilanterol62525mgonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopd
AT churchalison randomizedparallelgroupstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofumeclidiniumvilanterol62525mgonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopd
AT fahywilliama randomizedparallelgroupstudytoevaluatetheefficacyofumeclidiniumvilanterol62525mgonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeinpatientswithcopd