Cargando…

Neurocognitive testing and cochlear implantation: insights into performance in older adults

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case series was to assess the impact of auditory rehabilitation with cochlear implantation on the cognitive function of elderly patients over time. DESIGN: This is a longitudinal case series of prospective data assessing neurocognitive function and speech perception in an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cosetti, Maura K, Pinkston, James B, Flores, Jose M, Friedmann, David R, Jones, Callie B, Roland, J Thomas, Waltzman, Susan B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274210
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S100255
_version_ 1782432355543154688
author Cosetti, Maura K
Pinkston, James B
Flores, Jose M
Friedmann, David R
Jones, Callie B
Roland, J Thomas
Waltzman, Susan B
author_facet Cosetti, Maura K
Pinkston, James B
Flores, Jose M
Friedmann, David R
Jones, Callie B
Roland, J Thomas
Waltzman, Susan B
author_sort Cosetti, Maura K
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case series was to assess the impact of auditory rehabilitation with cochlear implantation on the cognitive function of elderly patients over time. DESIGN: This is a longitudinal case series of prospective data assessing neurocognitive function and speech perception in an elderly cohort pre- and post-implantation. SETTING: University cochlear implant center. PARTICIPANTS: The patients were post-lingually deafened elderly female (mean, 73.6 years; SD, 5.82; range, 67–81 years) cochlear implant recipients (n=7). MEASUREMENTS: A neurocognitive battery of 20 tests assessing intellectual function, learning, short- and long-term memory, verbal fluency, attention, mental flexibility, and processing speed was performed prior to and 2–4.1 years (mean, 3.7) after cochlear implant (CI). Speech perception testing using Consonant–Nucleus–Consonant words was performed prior to implantation and at regular intervals postoperatively. Individual and aggregate differences in cognitive function pre- and post-CI were estimated. Logistic regression with cluster adjustment was used to estimate the association (%improvement or %decline) between speech understanding and years from implantation at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years post-CI. RESULTS: Improvements after CI were observed in 14 (70%) of all subtests administered. Declines occurred in five (25%) subtests. In 55 individual tests (43%), post-CI performance improved compared to a patient’s own performance before implantation. Of these, nine (45%) showed moderate or pronounced improvement. Overall, improvements were largest in the verbal and memory domains. Logistic regression demonstrated a significant relationship between speech perception and cognitive function over time. Five neurocognitive tests were predictive of improved speech perception following implantation. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive neurocognitive testing of elderly women demonstrated areas of improvement in cognitive function and auditory perception following cochlear implantation. Multiple neurocognitive tests were strongly associated with current speech perception measures. While these data shed light on the complex relationship between hearing and cognition by showing that CI may slow the expected age-related cognitive decline, further research is needed to examine the impact of hearing rehabilitation on cognitive decline.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4869653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48696532016-06-07 Neurocognitive testing and cochlear implantation: insights into performance in older adults Cosetti, Maura K Pinkston, James B Flores, Jose M Friedmann, David R Jones, Callie B Roland, J Thomas Waltzman, Susan B Clin Interv Aging Original Research OBJECTIVE: The aim of this case series was to assess the impact of auditory rehabilitation with cochlear implantation on the cognitive function of elderly patients over time. DESIGN: This is a longitudinal case series of prospective data assessing neurocognitive function and speech perception in an elderly cohort pre- and post-implantation. SETTING: University cochlear implant center. PARTICIPANTS: The patients were post-lingually deafened elderly female (mean, 73.6 years; SD, 5.82; range, 67–81 years) cochlear implant recipients (n=7). MEASUREMENTS: A neurocognitive battery of 20 tests assessing intellectual function, learning, short- and long-term memory, verbal fluency, attention, mental flexibility, and processing speed was performed prior to and 2–4.1 years (mean, 3.7) after cochlear implant (CI). Speech perception testing using Consonant–Nucleus–Consonant words was performed prior to implantation and at regular intervals postoperatively. Individual and aggregate differences in cognitive function pre- and post-CI were estimated. Logistic regression with cluster adjustment was used to estimate the association (%improvement or %decline) between speech understanding and years from implantation at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years post-CI. RESULTS: Improvements after CI were observed in 14 (70%) of all subtests administered. Declines occurred in five (25%) subtests. In 55 individual tests (43%), post-CI performance improved compared to a patient’s own performance before implantation. Of these, nine (45%) showed moderate or pronounced improvement. Overall, improvements were largest in the verbal and memory domains. Logistic regression demonstrated a significant relationship between speech perception and cognitive function over time. Five neurocognitive tests were predictive of improved speech perception following implantation. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive neurocognitive testing of elderly women demonstrated areas of improvement in cognitive function and auditory perception following cochlear implantation. Multiple neurocognitive tests were strongly associated with current speech perception measures. While these data shed light on the complex relationship between hearing and cognition by showing that CI may slow the expected age-related cognitive decline, further research is needed to examine the impact of hearing rehabilitation on cognitive decline. Dove Medical Press 2016-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4869653/ /pubmed/27274210 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S100255 Text en © 2016 Cosetti et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cosetti, Maura K
Pinkston, James B
Flores, Jose M
Friedmann, David R
Jones, Callie B
Roland, J Thomas
Waltzman, Susan B
Neurocognitive testing and cochlear implantation: insights into performance in older adults
title Neurocognitive testing and cochlear implantation: insights into performance in older adults
title_full Neurocognitive testing and cochlear implantation: insights into performance in older adults
title_fullStr Neurocognitive testing and cochlear implantation: insights into performance in older adults
title_full_unstemmed Neurocognitive testing and cochlear implantation: insights into performance in older adults
title_short Neurocognitive testing and cochlear implantation: insights into performance in older adults
title_sort neurocognitive testing and cochlear implantation: insights into performance in older adults
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274210
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S100255
work_keys_str_mv AT cosettimaurak neurocognitivetestingandcochlearimplantationinsightsintoperformanceinolderadults
AT pinkstonjamesb neurocognitivetestingandcochlearimplantationinsightsintoperformanceinolderadults
AT floresjosem neurocognitivetestingandcochlearimplantationinsightsintoperformanceinolderadults
AT friedmanndavidr neurocognitivetestingandcochlearimplantationinsightsintoperformanceinolderadults
AT jonescallieb neurocognitivetestingandcochlearimplantationinsightsintoperformanceinolderadults
AT rolandjthomas neurocognitivetestingandcochlearimplantationinsightsintoperformanceinolderadults
AT waltzmansusanb neurocognitivetestingandcochlearimplantationinsightsintoperformanceinolderadults