Cargando…

The economic impact of educational training assessed by the Handling Questionnaire with three inhalation devices in asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients

BACKGROUND: The usability of inhalation devices depends on several factors, eg, the drug to inhale, device handling, and patients’ training. Usability is then presumed to have economic consequences. AIM: To assess and compare the cost of patients’ training for proper usability of Breezhaler and Genu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dal Negro, Roberto W, Povero, Massimiliano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274291
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S104066
_version_ 1782432355772792832
author Dal Negro, Roberto W
Povero, Massimiliano
author_facet Dal Negro, Roberto W
Povero, Massimiliano
author_sort Dal Negro, Roberto W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The usability of inhalation devices depends on several factors, eg, the drug to inhale, device handling, and patients’ training. Usability is then presumed to have economic consequences. AIM: To assess and compare the cost of patients’ training for proper usability of Breezhaler and Genuair (both dry powder inhalers) and Respimat (a soft mist inhaler) in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) outpatients. METHODS: The acceptance and handling of the three devices were investigated by means of the Handling Questionnaire. The time spent in specific training for ensuring a proper actuation and the corresponding costs were also calculated. Linear and logistic regressions were used in order to investigate the factors influencing proper handling of the devices. A significance level of P<0.05 was accepted. RESULTS: According to both the patients’ and the nurse’s judgments, Genuair and Respimat were perceived as the easiest devices to use, while Breezhaler required the highest number of attempts for achieving the first proper actuation (2.6 vs 1.6; P<0.0001). The total training cost per patient (including the nurse’s time for demonstration and that for attending the patients’ maneuvers) was €1.38±€1.21. Breezhaler was found to be the most expensive as the cost per patient was €2.35±€1.26, which was three to four times higher than that of Genuair and Respimat (both devices involved a cost of <€1 per patient, with negligible differences between each other). Asthma and COPD patients showed a similar trend, with better outcomes reported for asthma patients probably due to lower age. CONCLUSION: Substantial differences were found to exist in patients’ acceptability and handling of the three devices. The economic impact of specific training was also different and strictly related to the comprehension of the procedure for actuation of each device. Respimat as a soft mist inhaler and Genuair as an metered-dose inhaler proved to be the most convenient in economic terms also.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4869654
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48696542016-06-07 The economic impact of educational training assessed by the Handling Questionnaire with three inhalation devices in asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients Dal Negro, Roberto W Povero, Massimiliano Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research BACKGROUND: The usability of inhalation devices depends on several factors, eg, the drug to inhale, device handling, and patients’ training. Usability is then presumed to have economic consequences. AIM: To assess and compare the cost of patients’ training for proper usability of Breezhaler and Genuair (both dry powder inhalers) and Respimat (a soft mist inhaler) in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) outpatients. METHODS: The acceptance and handling of the three devices were investigated by means of the Handling Questionnaire. The time spent in specific training for ensuring a proper actuation and the corresponding costs were also calculated. Linear and logistic regressions were used in order to investigate the factors influencing proper handling of the devices. A significance level of P<0.05 was accepted. RESULTS: According to both the patients’ and the nurse’s judgments, Genuair and Respimat were perceived as the easiest devices to use, while Breezhaler required the highest number of attempts for achieving the first proper actuation (2.6 vs 1.6; P<0.0001). The total training cost per patient (including the nurse’s time for demonstration and that for attending the patients’ maneuvers) was €1.38±€1.21. Breezhaler was found to be the most expensive as the cost per patient was €2.35±€1.26, which was three to four times higher than that of Genuair and Respimat (both devices involved a cost of <€1 per patient, with negligible differences between each other). Asthma and COPD patients showed a similar trend, with better outcomes reported for asthma patients probably due to lower age. CONCLUSION: Substantial differences were found to exist in patients’ acceptability and handling of the three devices. The economic impact of specific training was also different and strictly related to the comprehension of the procedure for actuation of each device. Respimat as a soft mist inhaler and Genuair as an metered-dose inhaler proved to be the most convenient in economic terms also. Dove Medical Press 2016-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4869654/ /pubmed/27274291 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S104066 Text en © 2016 Dal Negro and Povero. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Dal Negro, Roberto W
Povero, Massimiliano
The economic impact of educational training assessed by the Handling Questionnaire with three inhalation devices in asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients
title The economic impact of educational training assessed by the Handling Questionnaire with three inhalation devices in asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients
title_full The economic impact of educational training assessed by the Handling Questionnaire with three inhalation devices in asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients
title_fullStr The economic impact of educational training assessed by the Handling Questionnaire with three inhalation devices in asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients
title_full_unstemmed The economic impact of educational training assessed by the Handling Questionnaire with three inhalation devices in asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients
title_short The economic impact of educational training assessed by the Handling Questionnaire with three inhalation devices in asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients
title_sort economic impact of educational training assessed by the handling questionnaire with three inhalation devices in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4869654/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274291
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S104066
work_keys_str_mv AT dalnegrorobertow theeconomicimpactofeducationaltrainingassessedbythehandlingquestionnairewiththreeinhalationdevicesinasthmaandchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatients
AT poveromassimiliano theeconomicimpactofeducationaltrainingassessedbythehandlingquestionnairewiththreeinhalationdevicesinasthmaandchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatients
AT dalnegrorobertow economicimpactofeducationaltrainingassessedbythehandlingquestionnairewiththreeinhalationdevicesinasthmaandchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatients
AT poveromassimiliano economicimpactofeducationaltrainingassessedbythehandlingquestionnairewiththreeinhalationdevicesinasthmaandchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasepatients