Cargando…

In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Selected Ga-68 and Zr-89 Labelled Siderophores

PURPOSE: Some [(68)Ga]siderophores show promise in specific and sensitive imaging of infection. Here, we compare the in vitro and in vivo behaviour of selected Ga-68 and Zr-89 labelled siderophores. PROCEDURES: Radiolabelling was performed in HEPES or sodium acetate buffer systems. Radiochemical pur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petrik, Milos, Zhai, Chuangyan, Novy, Zbynek, Urbanek, Lubor, Haas, Hubertus, Decristoforo, Clemens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4870302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26424719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-015-0897-6
_version_ 1782432414890459136
author Petrik, Milos
Zhai, Chuangyan
Novy, Zbynek
Urbanek, Lubor
Haas, Hubertus
Decristoforo, Clemens
author_facet Petrik, Milos
Zhai, Chuangyan
Novy, Zbynek
Urbanek, Lubor
Haas, Hubertus
Decristoforo, Clemens
author_sort Petrik, Milos
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Some [(68)Ga]siderophores show promise in specific and sensitive imaging of infection. Here, we compare the in vitro and in vivo behaviour of selected Ga-68 and Zr-89 labelled siderophores. PROCEDURES: Radiolabelling was performed in HEPES or sodium acetate buffer systems. Radiochemical purity of labelled siderophores was determined using chromatography. Partition coefficients, in vitro stability and protein binding affinities were determined. Ex vivo biodistribution and animal imaging was studied in mice. RESULTS: Certain differences among studied siderophores were observed in labelling efficiency. Protein binding and stability tests showed highest stabilities and lowest protein binding affinities for Ga-68 and [(89)Zr]triacetylfusarinine C (TAFC). All studied Ga-68 and [(89)Zr]siderophores exhibited a similar biodistribution and pharmacokinetics in mice with the exception of [(89)Zr]ferrioxamine E (FOXE). CONCLUSIONS: Zr-89 and [(68)Ga]siderophores showed analogous in vitro and in vivo behaviour. Tested [(89)Zr]siderophores could be applied for longitudinal positron emission tomography (PET) studies of fungal infections and especially TAFC for the development of novel bioconjugates. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11307-015-0897-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4870302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48703022016-06-21 In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Selected Ga-68 and Zr-89 Labelled Siderophores Petrik, Milos Zhai, Chuangyan Novy, Zbynek Urbanek, Lubor Haas, Hubertus Decristoforo, Clemens Mol Imaging Biol Research Article PURPOSE: Some [(68)Ga]siderophores show promise in specific and sensitive imaging of infection. Here, we compare the in vitro and in vivo behaviour of selected Ga-68 and Zr-89 labelled siderophores. PROCEDURES: Radiolabelling was performed in HEPES or sodium acetate buffer systems. Radiochemical purity of labelled siderophores was determined using chromatography. Partition coefficients, in vitro stability and protein binding affinities were determined. Ex vivo biodistribution and animal imaging was studied in mice. RESULTS: Certain differences among studied siderophores were observed in labelling efficiency. Protein binding and stability tests showed highest stabilities and lowest protein binding affinities for Ga-68 and [(89)Zr]triacetylfusarinine C (TAFC). All studied Ga-68 and [(89)Zr]siderophores exhibited a similar biodistribution and pharmacokinetics in mice with the exception of [(89)Zr]ferrioxamine E (FOXE). CONCLUSIONS: Zr-89 and [(68)Ga]siderophores showed analogous in vitro and in vivo behaviour. Tested [(89)Zr]siderophores could be applied for longitudinal positron emission tomography (PET) studies of fungal infections and especially TAFC for the development of novel bioconjugates. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11307-015-0897-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2015-09-30 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4870302/ /pubmed/26424719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-015-0897-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
Petrik, Milos
Zhai, Chuangyan
Novy, Zbynek
Urbanek, Lubor
Haas, Hubertus
Decristoforo, Clemens
In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Selected Ga-68 and Zr-89 Labelled Siderophores
title In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Selected Ga-68 and Zr-89 Labelled Siderophores
title_full In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Selected Ga-68 and Zr-89 Labelled Siderophores
title_fullStr In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Selected Ga-68 and Zr-89 Labelled Siderophores
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Selected Ga-68 and Zr-89 Labelled Siderophores
title_short In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Selected Ga-68 and Zr-89 Labelled Siderophores
title_sort in vitro and in vivo comparison of selected ga-68 and zr-89 labelled siderophores
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4870302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26424719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11307-015-0897-6
work_keys_str_mv AT petrikmilos invitroandinvivocomparisonofselectedga68andzr89labelledsiderophores
AT zhaichuangyan invitroandinvivocomparisonofselectedga68andzr89labelledsiderophores
AT novyzbynek invitroandinvivocomparisonofselectedga68andzr89labelledsiderophores
AT urbaneklubor invitroandinvivocomparisonofselectedga68andzr89labelledsiderophores
AT haashubertus invitroandinvivocomparisonofselectedga68andzr89labelledsiderophores
AT decristoforoclemens invitroandinvivocomparisonofselectedga68andzr89labelledsiderophores