Cargando…
Is radioiodine administration in patients with papillary thyroid multifocal microcarcinoma unnecessary?
Radioiodine (RAI) has played a crucial role in differentiated thyroid cancer treatment for more than 60years. However, the use of RAI administration in patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (even multifocal) is now being widely discussed and often not recommended. In accordance with Europea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bioscientifica Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4870506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27252861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EDM-15-0138 |
_version_ | 1782432445732225024 |
---|---|
author | Krčálová, Eva Horáček, Jiří Kudlej, Lubomír Rousková, Viera Michlová, Blanka Vyhnánková, Irena Doležal, Jiří Malý, Jaroslav Žák, Pavel |
author_facet | Krčálová, Eva Horáček, Jiří Kudlej, Lubomír Rousková, Viera Michlová, Blanka Vyhnánková, Irena Doležal, Jiří Malý, Jaroslav Žák, Pavel |
author_sort | Krčálová, Eva |
collection | PubMed |
description | Radioiodine (RAI) has played a crucial role in differentiated thyroid cancer treatment for more than 60years. However, the use of RAI administration in patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (even multifocal) is now being widely discussed and often not recommended. In accordance with European consensus, and contrary to the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines, we recently performed RAI thyroid remnant ablation in a patient with differentiated papillary multifocal microcarcinoma. The post-therapeutic whole-body scan and SPECT/CT revealed the real and unexpected extent of disease, with metastases to upper mediastinal lymph nodes. This finding led to the patient’s upstaging from stage I to stage IVa according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer criteria. LEARNING POINTS: (131)I is a combined beta–gamma emitter, thus allowing not only residual thyroid tissue ablation but also metastatic tissue imaging. RAI remnant ablation omission also means post-treatment whole-body scan omission, which may lead to disease underestimation, due to incorrect nodal and metastatic staging. RAI should be considered also in “low-risk” patients, especially when the lymph node involvement is not reliably documented. Lower administered RAI activity (30mCi, 1.1GBq) may be a workable compromise in low-risk patients, not indicated for RAI remnant ablation according to ATA guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4870506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Bioscientifica Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48705062016-06-01 Is radioiodine administration in patients with papillary thyroid multifocal microcarcinoma unnecessary? Krčálová, Eva Horáček, Jiří Kudlej, Lubomír Rousková, Viera Michlová, Blanka Vyhnánková, Irena Doležal, Jiří Malý, Jaroslav Žák, Pavel Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep Error in Diagnosis/Pitfalls and Caveats Radioiodine (RAI) has played a crucial role in differentiated thyroid cancer treatment for more than 60years. However, the use of RAI administration in patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (even multifocal) is now being widely discussed and often not recommended. In accordance with European consensus, and contrary to the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines, we recently performed RAI thyroid remnant ablation in a patient with differentiated papillary multifocal microcarcinoma. The post-therapeutic whole-body scan and SPECT/CT revealed the real and unexpected extent of disease, with metastases to upper mediastinal lymph nodes. This finding led to the patient’s upstaging from stage I to stage IVa according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer criteria. LEARNING POINTS: (131)I is a combined beta–gamma emitter, thus allowing not only residual thyroid tissue ablation but also metastatic tissue imaging. RAI remnant ablation omission also means post-treatment whole-body scan omission, which may lead to disease underestimation, due to incorrect nodal and metastatic staging. RAI should be considered also in “low-risk” patients, especially when the lymph node involvement is not reliably documented. Lower administered RAI activity (30mCi, 1.1GBq) may be a workable compromise in low-risk patients, not indicated for RAI remnant ablation according to ATA guidelines. Bioscientifica Ltd 2016-05-01 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4870506/ /pubmed/27252861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EDM-15-0138 Text en © 2016 The authors This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en_GB) . |
spellingShingle | Error in Diagnosis/Pitfalls and Caveats Krčálová, Eva Horáček, Jiří Kudlej, Lubomír Rousková, Viera Michlová, Blanka Vyhnánková, Irena Doležal, Jiří Malý, Jaroslav Žák, Pavel Is radioiodine administration in patients with papillary thyroid multifocal microcarcinoma unnecessary? |
title | Is radioiodine administration in patients with papillary thyroid multifocal microcarcinoma unnecessary? |
title_full | Is radioiodine administration in patients with papillary thyroid multifocal microcarcinoma unnecessary? |
title_fullStr | Is radioiodine administration in patients with papillary thyroid multifocal microcarcinoma unnecessary? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is radioiodine administration in patients with papillary thyroid multifocal microcarcinoma unnecessary? |
title_short | Is radioiodine administration in patients with papillary thyroid multifocal microcarcinoma unnecessary? |
title_sort | is radioiodine administration in patients with papillary thyroid multifocal microcarcinoma unnecessary? |
topic | Error in Diagnosis/Pitfalls and Caveats |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4870506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27252861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EDM-15-0138 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krcalovaeva isradioiodineadministrationinpatientswithpapillarythyroidmultifocalmicrocarcinomaunnecessary AT horacekjiri isradioiodineadministrationinpatientswithpapillarythyroidmultifocalmicrocarcinomaunnecessary AT kudlejlubomir isradioiodineadministrationinpatientswithpapillarythyroidmultifocalmicrocarcinomaunnecessary AT rouskovaviera isradioiodineadministrationinpatientswithpapillarythyroidmultifocalmicrocarcinomaunnecessary AT michlovablanka isradioiodineadministrationinpatientswithpapillarythyroidmultifocalmicrocarcinomaunnecessary AT vyhnankovairena isradioiodineadministrationinpatientswithpapillarythyroidmultifocalmicrocarcinomaunnecessary AT dolezaljiri isradioiodineadministrationinpatientswithpapillarythyroidmultifocalmicrocarcinomaunnecessary AT malyjaroslav isradioiodineadministrationinpatientswithpapillarythyroidmultifocalmicrocarcinomaunnecessary AT zakpavel isradioiodineadministrationinpatientswithpapillarythyroidmultifocalmicrocarcinomaunnecessary |