Cargando…

The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network

BACKGROUND: Among the unique features of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) Program is the requirement for each Consortium to include patient advocacy groups (PAGs) as research partners. This development has transformed the work of the RDCRN and is a model for collaborative research...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merkel, Peter A., Manion, Michele, Gopal-Srivastava, Rashmi, Groft, Stephen, Jinnah, H. A., Robertson, David, Krischer, Jeffrey P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4870759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27194034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0445-8
_version_ 1782432492467257344
author Merkel, Peter A.
Manion, Michele
Gopal-Srivastava, Rashmi
Groft, Stephen
Jinnah, H. A.
Robertson, David
Krischer, Jeffrey P.
author_facet Merkel, Peter A.
Manion, Michele
Gopal-Srivastava, Rashmi
Groft, Stephen
Jinnah, H. A.
Robertson, David
Krischer, Jeffrey P.
author_sort Merkel, Peter A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Among the unique features of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) Program is the requirement for each Consortium to include patient advocacy groups (PAGs) as research partners. This development has transformed the work of the RDCRN and is a model for collaborative research. This article outlines the roles patients and PAGs play in the RDCRN and reports on the PAGs’ impact on the Network’s success. METHODS: Principal Investigators from the 17 RDCRN Consortia and 28 representatives from 76 PAGs affiliated with these Consortia were contacted by email to provide feedback via an online RDCRN survey. Impact was measured in the key areas of 1) Research logistics; 2) Outreach and communication; and 3) Funding and in-kind support. Rating choices were: 1-very negative, 2-somewhat negative, 3-no impact, 4-somewhat positive, and 5-very positive. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of the PAGs (96 %) disseminate information about the RDCRN within the patient community. The Consortium Principal Investigators also reported high levels of PAG involvement. Sixteen (94 %) Consortium Principal Investigators and 25 PAGs (89 %) reported PAGs participation in protocol review, study design, Consortium conference calls, attending Consortium meetings, or helping with patient recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: PAGs are actively involved in shaping Consortia’s research agendas, help ensure the feasibility and success of research protocols by assisting with study design and patient recruitment, and support training programs. This extensive PAG-Investigator partnership in the RDCRN has had a strongly positive impact on the success of the Network.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4870759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48707592016-05-19 The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network Merkel, Peter A. Manion, Michele Gopal-Srivastava, Rashmi Groft, Stephen Jinnah, H. A. Robertson, David Krischer, Jeffrey P. Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Among the unique features of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) Program is the requirement for each Consortium to include patient advocacy groups (PAGs) as research partners. This development has transformed the work of the RDCRN and is a model for collaborative research. This article outlines the roles patients and PAGs play in the RDCRN and reports on the PAGs’ impact on the Network’s success. METHODS: Principal Investigators from the 17 RDCRN Consortia and 28 representatives from 76 PAGs affiliated with these Consortia were contacted by email to provide feedback via an online RDCRN survey. Impact was measured in the key areas of 1) Research logistics; 2) Outreach and communication; and 3) Funding and in-kind support. Rating choices were: 1-very negative, 2-somewhat negative, 3-no impact, 4-somewhat positive, and 5-very positive. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of the PAGs (96 %) disseminate information about the RDCRN within the patient community. The Consortium Principal Investigators also reported high levels of PAG involvement. Sixteen (94 %) Consortium Principal Investigators and 25 PAGs (89 %) reported PAGs participation in protocol review, study design, Consortium conference calls, attending Consortium meetings, or helping with patient recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: PAGs are actively involved in shaping Consortia’s research agendas, help ensure the feasibility and success of research protocols by assisting with study design and patient recruitment, and support training programs. This extensive PAG-Investigator partnership in the RDCRN has had a strongly positive impact on the success of the Network. BioMed Central 2016-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4870759/ /pubmed/27194034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0445-8 Text en © Merkel et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Merkel, Peter A.
Manion, Michele
Gopal-Srivastava, Rashmi
Groft, Stephen
Jinnah, H. A.
Robertson, David
Krischer, Jeffrey P.
The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network
title The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network
title_full The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network
title_fullStr The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network
title_full_unstemmed The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network
title_short The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network
title_sort partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4870759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27194034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0445-8
work_keys_str_mv AT merkelpetera thepartnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork
AT manionmichele thepartnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork
AT gopalsrivastavarashmi thepartnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork
AT groftstephen thepartnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork
AT jinnahha thepartnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork
AT robertsondavid thepartnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork
AT krischerjeffreyp thepartnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork
AT thepartnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork
AT merkelpetera partnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork
AT manionmichele partnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork
AT gopalsrivastavarashmi partnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork
AT groftstephen partnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork
AT jinnahha partnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork
AT robertsondavid partnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork
AT krischerjeffreyp partnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork
AT partnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork