Cargando…
The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network
BACKGROUND: Among the unique features of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) Program is the requirement for each Consortium to include patient advocacy groups (PAGs) as research partners. This development has transformed the work of the RDCRN and is a model for collaborative research...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4870759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27194034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0445-8 |
_version_ | 1782432492467257344 |
---|---|
author | Merkel, Peter A. Manion, Michele Gopal-Srivastava, Rashmi Groft, Stephen Jinnah, H. A. Robertson, David Krischer, Jeffrey P. |
author_facet | Merkel, Peter A. Manion, Michele Gopal-Srivastava, Rashmi Groft, Stephen Jinnah, H. A. Robertson, David Krischer, Jeffrey P. |
author_sort | Merkel, Peter A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Among the unique features of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) Program is the requirement for each Consortium to include patient advocacy groups (PAGs) as research partners. This development has transformed the work of the RDCRN and is a model for collaborative research. This article outlines the roles patients and PAGs play in the RDCRN and reports on the PAGs’ impact on the Network’s success. METHODS: Principal Investigators from the 17 RDCRN Consortia and 28 representatives from 76 PAGs affiliated with these Consortia were contacted by email to provide feedback via an online RDCRN survey. Impact was measured in the key areas of 1) Research logistics; 2) Outreach and communication; and 3) Funding and in-kind support. Rating choices were: 1-very negative, 2-somewhat negative, 3-no impact, 4-somewhat positive, and 5-very positive. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of the PAGs (96 %) disseminate information about the RDCRN within the patient community. The Consortium Principal Investigators also reported high levels of PAG involvement. Sixteen (94 %) Consortium Principal Investigators and 25 PAGs (89 %) reported PAGs participation in protocol review, study design, Consortium conference calls, attending Consortium meetings, or helping with patient recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: PAGs are actively involved in shaping Consortia’s research agendas, help ensure the feasibility and success of research protocols by assisting with study design and patient recruitment, and support training programs. This extensive PAG-Investigator partnership in the RDCRN has had a strongly positive impact on the success of the Network. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4870759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48707592016-05-19 The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network Merkel, Peter A. Manion, Michele Gopal-Srivastava, Rashmi Groft, Stephen Jinnah, H. A. Robertson, David Krischer, Jeffrey P. Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Among the unique features of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) Program is the requirement for each Consortium to include patient advocacy groups (PAGs) as research partners. This development has transformed the work of the RDCRN and is a model for collaborative research. This article outlines the roles patients and PAGs play in the RDCRN and reports on the PAGs’ impact on the Network’s success. METHODS: Principal Investigators from the 17 RDCRN Consortia and 28 representatives from 76 PAGs affiliated with these Consortia were contacted by email to provide feedback via an online RDCRN survey. Impact was measured in the key areas of 1) Research logistics; 2) Outreach and communication; and 3) Funding and in-kind support. Rating choices were: 1-very negative, 2-somewhat negative, 3-no impact, 4-somewhat positive, and 5-very positive. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of the PAGs (96 %) disseminate information about the RDCRN within the patient community. The Consortium Principal Investigators also reported high levels of PAG involvement. Sixteen (94 %) Consortium Principal Investigators and 25 PAGs (89 %) reported PAGs participation in protocol review, study design, Consortium conference calls, attending Consortium meetings, or helping with patient recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: PAGs are actively involved in shaping Consortia’s research agendas, help ensure the feasibility and success of research protocols by assisting with study design and patient recruitment, and support training programs. This extensive PAG-Investigator partnership in the RDCRN has had a strongly positive impact on the success of the Network. BioMed Central 2016-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4870759/ /pubmed/27194034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0445-8 Text en © Merkel et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Merkel, Peter A. Manion, Michele Gopal-Srivastava, Rashmi Groft, Stephen Jinnah, H. A. Robertson, David Krischer, Jeffrey P. The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network |
title | The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network |
title_full | The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network |
title_fullStr | The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network |
title_full_unstemmed | The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network |
title_short | The partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network |
title_sort | partnership of patient advocacy groups and clinical investigators in the rare diseases clinical research network |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4870759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27194034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0445-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT merkelpetera thepartnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork AT manionmichele thepartnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork AT gopalsrivastavarashmi thepartnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork AT groftstephen thepartnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork AT jinnahha thepartnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork AT robertsondavid thepartnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork AT krischerjeffreyp thepartnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork AT thepartnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork AT merkelpetera partnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork AT manionmichele partnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork AT gopalsrivastavarashmi partnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork AT groftstephen partnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork AT jinnahha partnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork AT robertsondavid partnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork AT krischerjeffreyp partnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork AT partnershipofpatientadvocacygroupsandclinicalinvestigatorsintherarediseasesclinicalresearchnetwork |