Cargando…

An investigation of the dose distribution effect related with collimator angle in volumetric arc therapy of prostate cancer

To investigate the dose-volume variations of planning target volume (PTV) and organ at risks (OARs) in eleven prostate cancer patients planned with single and double arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) when varying collimator angle. Single and double arc VMAT treatment plans were created usi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tas, Bora, Bilge, Hatice, Ozturk, Sibel Tokdemir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4870998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217621
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.181635
_version_ 1782432536057610240
author Tas, Bora
Bilge, Hatice
Ozturk, Sibel Tokdemir
author_facet Tas, Bora
Bilge, Hatice
Ozturk, Sibel Tokdemir
author_sort Tas, Bora
collection PubMed
description To investigate the dose-volume variations of planning target volume (PTV) and organ at risks (OARs) in eleven prostate cancer patients planned with single and double arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) when varying collimator angle. Single and double arc VMAT treatment plans were created using Monaco5.0(®) with collimator angle set to 0°. All plans were normalized 7600 cGy dose to the 95% of clinical target volume (CTV) volume. The single arc VMAT plans were reoptimized with different collimator angles (0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90°), and for double arc VMAT plans (0–0°, 15°–345, 30–330°, 45–315°, 60–300°, 75–285°, 90–270°) using the same optimization parameters. For the comparison the parameters of heterogeneity index (HI), dose-volume histogram and minimum dose to the 95% of PTV volume (D95 PTV) calculated and analyzed. The best plans were verified using 2 dimensional ion chamber array IBA Matrixx(®) and three-dimensional IBA Compass(®) program. The comparison between calculation and measurement were made by the γ-index (3%/3 mm) analysis. A higher D95 (PTV) were found for single arc VMAT with 15° collimator angle. For double arc, VMAT with 60–300° and 75–285° collimator angles. However, lower rectum doses obtained for 75–285° collimator angles. There was no significant dose difference, based on other OARs which are bladder and femur head. When we compared single and double arc VMAT's D95 (PTV), we determined 2.44% high coverage and lower HI with double arc VMAT. All plans passed the γ-index (3%/3 mm) analysis with more than 97% of the points and we had an average γ-index for CTV 0.36, for PTV 0.32 with double arc VMAT. These results were significant by Wilcoxon signed rank test statistically. The results show that dose coverage of target and OAR's doses also depend significantly on the collimator angles due to the geometry of target and OARs. Based on the results we have decided to plan prostate cancer patients in our clinic with double arc VMAT and 75°–285° collimator angles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4870998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48709982016-05-23 An investigation of the dose distribution effect related with collimator angle in volumetric arc therapy of prostate cancer Tas, Bora Bilge, Hatice Ozturk, Sibel Tokdemir J Med Phys Original Article To investigate the dose-volume variations of planning target volume (PTV) and organ at risks (OARs) in eleven prostate cancer patients planned with single and double arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) when varying collimator angle. Single and double arc VMAT treatment plans were created using Monaco5.0(®) with collimator angle set to 0°. All plans were normalized 7600 cGy dose to the 95% of clinical target volume (CTV) volume. The single arc VMAT plans were reoptimized with different collimator angles (0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90°), and for double arc VMAT plans (0–0°, 15°–345, 30–330°, 45–315°, 60–300°, 75–285°, 90–270°) using the same optimization parameters. For the comparison the parameters of heterogeneity index (HI), dose-volume histogram and minimum dose to the 95% of PTV volume (D95 PTV) calculated and analyzed. The best plans were verified using 2 dimensional ion chamber array IBA Matrixx(®) and three-dimensional IBA Compass(®) program. The comparison between calculation and measurement were made by the γ-index (3%/3 mm) analysis. A higher D95 (PTV) were found for single arc VMAT with 15° collimator angle. For double arc, VMAT with 60–300° and 75–285° collimator angles. However, lower rectum doses obtained for 75–285° collimator angles. There was no significant dose difference, based on other OARs which are bladder and femur head. When we compared single and double arc VMAT's D95 (PTV), we determined 2.44% high coverage and lower HI with double arc VMAT. All plans passed the γ-index (3%/3 mm) analysis with more than 97% of the points and we had an average γ-index for CTV 0.36, for PTV 0.32 with double arc VMAT. These results were significant by Wilcoxon signed rank test statistically. The results show that dose coverage of target and OAR's doses also depend significantly on the collimator angles due to the geometry of target and OARs. Based on the results we have decided to plan prostate cancer patients in our clinic with double arc VMAT and 75°–285° collimator angles. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4870998/ /pubmed/27217621 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.181635 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tas, Bora
Bilge, Hatice
Ozturk, Sibel Tokdemir
An investigation of the dose distribution effect related with collimator angle in volumetric arc therapy of prostate cancer
title An investigation of the dose distribution effect related with collimator angle in volumetric arc therapy of prostate cancer
title_full An investigation of the dose distribution effect related with collimator angle in volumetric arc therapy of prostate cancer
title_fullStr An investigation of the dose distribution effect related with collimator angle in volumetric arc therapy of prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed An investigation of the dose distribution effect related with collimator angle in volumetric arc therapy of prostate cancer
title_short An investigation of the dose distribution effect related with collimator angle in volumetric arc therapy of prostate cancer
title_sort investigation of the dose distribution effect related with collimator angle in volumetric arc therapy of prostate cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4870998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217621
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.181635
work_keys_str_mv AT tasbora aninvestigationofthedosedistributioneffectrelatedwithcollimatorangleinvolumetricarctherapyofprostatecancer
AT bilgehatice aninvestigationofthedosedistributioneffectrelatedwithcollimatorangleinvolumetricarctherapyofprostatecancer
AT ozturksibeltokdemir aninvestigationofthedosedistributioneffectrelatedwithcollimatorangleinvolumetricarctherapyofprostatecancer
AT tasbora investigationofthedosedistributioneffectrelatedwithcollimatorangleinvolumetricarctherapyofprostatecancer
AT bilgehatice investigationofthedosedistributioneffectrelatedwithcollimatorangleinvolumetricarctherapyofprostatecancer
AT ozturksibeltokdemir investigationofthedosedistributioneffectrelatedwithcollimatorangleinvolumetricarctherapyofprostatecancer