Cargando…
Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of CyberKnife M6™ InCise multileaf collimator over IRIS™ variable collimator in prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy
The impetus behind our study was to establish a quantitative comparison between the IRIS collimator and the InCise multileaf collimator (MLC) (Accuray Inc. Synnyvale, CA) for prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Treatment plans for ten prostate cancer patients were performed on Multi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217626 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.181638 |
_version_ | 1782432537193218048 |
---|---|
author | Kathriarachchi, Vindu Shang, Charles Evans, Grant Leventouri, Theodora Kalantzis, Georgios |
author_facet | Kathriarachchi, Vindu Shang, Charles Evans, Grant Leventouri, Theodora Kalantzis, Georgios |
author_sort | Kathriarachchi, Vindu |
collection | PubMed |
description | The impetus behind our study was to establish a quantitative comparison between the IRIS collimator and the InCise multileaf collimator (MLC) (Accuray Inc. Synnyvale, CA) for prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Treatment plans for ten prostate cancer patients were performed on MultiPlan™ 5.1.2 treatment planning system utilizing MLC and IRIS for 36.25 Gy in five fractions. To reduce the magnitude of variations between cases, the planning tumor volume (PTV) was defined and outlined for treating prostate gland only, assuming no seminal vesicle or ex-capsule involvement. Evaluation indices of each plan include PTV coverage, conformity index (CI), Paddick's new CI, homogeneity index, and gradient index. Organ at risk (OAR) dose sparing was analyzed by the bladder wall D(max) and V(37Gy), rectum D(max) and V(36Gy). The radiobiological response was evaluated by tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability based on equivalent uniform dose. The dose delivery efficiency was evaluated on the basis of planned monitor units (MUs) and the reported treatment time per fraction. Statistical significance was tested using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The studies indicated that CyberKnife M6™ IRIS and InCise™ MLC produce equivalent SBRT prostate treatment plans in terms of dosimetry, radiobiology, and OAR sparing, except that the MLC plans offer improvement of the dose fall-off gradient by 29% over IRIS. The main advantage of replacing the IRIS collimator with MLC is the improved efficiency, determined from the reduction of MUs by 42%, and a 36% faster delivery time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4871003 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48710032016-05-23 Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of CyberKnife M6™ InCise multileaf collimator over IRIS™ variable collimator in prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy Kathriarachchi, Vindu Shang, Charles Evans, Grant Leventouri, Theodora Kalantzis, Georgios J Med Phys Original Article The impetus behind our study was to establish a quantitative comparison between the IRIS collimator and the InCise multileaf collimator (MLC) (Accuray Inc. Synnyvale, CA) for prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Treatment plans for ten prostate cancer patients were performed on MultiPlan™ 5.1.2 treatment planning system utilizing MLC and IRIS for 36.25 Gy in five fractions. To reduce the magnitude of variations between cases, the planning tumor volume (PTV) was defined and outlined for treating prostate gland only, assuming no seminal vesicle or ex-capsule involvement. Evaluation indices of each plan include PTV coverage, conformity index (CI), Paddick's new CI, homogeneity index, and gradient index. Organ at risk (OAR) dose sparing was analyzed by the bladder wall D(max) and V(37Gy), rectum D(max) and V(36Gy). The radiobiological response was evaluated by tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability based on equivalent uniform dose. The dose delivery efficiency was evaluated on the basis of planned monitor units (MUs) and the reported treatment time per fraction. Statistical significance was tested using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The studies indicated that CyberKnife M6™ IRIS and InCise™ MLC produce equivalent SBRT prostate treatment plans in terms of dosimetry, radiobiology, and OAR sparing, except that the MLC plans offer improvement of the dose fall-off gradient by 29% over IRIS. The main advantage of replacing the IRIS collimator with MLC is the improved efficiency, determined from the reduction of MUs by 42%, and a 36% faster delivery time. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4871003/ /pubmed/27217626 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.181638 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kathriarachchi, Vindu Shang, Charles Evans, Grant Leventouri, Theodora Kalantzis, Georgios Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of CyberKnife M6™ InCise multileaf collimator over IRIS™ variable collimator in prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy |
title | Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of CyberKnife M6™ InCise multileaf collimator over IRIS™ variable collimator in prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy |
title_full | Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of CyberKnife M6™ InCise multileaf collimator over IRIS™ variable collimator in prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy |
title_fullStr | Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of CyberKnife M6™ InCise multileaf collimator over IRIS™ variable collimator in prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of CyberKnife M6™ InCise multileaf collimator over IRIS™ variable collimator in prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy |
title_short | Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of CyberKnife M6™ InCise multileaf collimator over IRIS™ variable collimator in prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy |
title_sort | dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of cyberknife m6™ incise multileaf collimator over iris™ variable collimator in prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217626 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.181638 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kathriarachchivindu dosimetricandradiobiologicalcomparisonofcyberknifem6incisemultileafcollimatoroveririsvariablecollimatorinprostatestereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT shangcharles dosimetricandradiobiologicalcomparisonofcyberknifem6incisemultileafcollimatoroveririsvariablecollimatorinprostatestereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT evansgrant dosimetricandradiobiologicalcomparisonofcyberknifem6incisemultileafcollimatoroveririsvariablecollimatorinprostatestereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT leventouritheodora dosimetricandradiobiologicalcomparisonofcyberknifem6incisemultileafcollimatoroveririsvariablecollimatorinprostatestereotacticbodyradiationtherapy AT kalantzisgeorgios dosimetricandradiobiologicalcomparisonofcyberknifem6incisemultileafcollimatoroveririsvariablecollimatorinprostatestereotacticbodyradiationtherapy |