Cargando…

Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy

To assess and analyze the impact of setup uncertainties on target volume coverage and doses to organs at risk (OAR) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Translational setup errors in 25 HNC patients were observed by kilovoltage cone beam computed tomogr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaur, Inderjit, Rawat, Sheh, Ahlawat, Parveen, Kakria, Anjali, Gupta, Gourav, Saxena, Upasna, Mishra, Manindra Bhushan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217627
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.181640
_version_ 1782432537412370432
author Kaur, Inderjit
Rawat, Sheh
Ahlawat, Parveen
Kakria, Anjali
Gupta, Gourav
Saxena, Upasna
Mishra, Manindra Bhushan
author_facet Kaur, Inderjit
Rawat, Sheh
Ahlawat, Parveen
Kakria, Anjali
Gupta, Gourav
Saxena, Upasna
Mishra, Manindra Bhushan
author_sort Kaur, Inderjit
collection PubMed
description To assess and analyze the impact of setup uncertainties on target volume coverage and doses to organs at risk (OAR) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Translational setup errors in 25 HNC patients were observed by kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (kV CBCT). Two plans were generated. Plan one – the original plan which was the initially optimized and approved plan of the patient. All patients were treated according to their respective approved plans at a defined isocenter. Plan two – the plan sum which was the sum of all plans recalculated at a different isocenter according to setup errors in x, y, and z-direction. Plan sum was created to evaluate doses that would have been received by planning target volume (PTV) and OARs if setup errors were not corrected. These 2 plans were analyzed and compared in terms of target volume coverage and doses to OARs. A total 503 kV CBCT images were acquired for evaluation of setup errors in 25 HNC patients. The systematic (mean) and random errors (standard deviation) combined for 25 patients in x, y, and z directions were 0.15 cm, 0.21 cm, and 0.19 cm and 0.09 cm, 0.12 cm, and 0.09 cm, respectively. The study showed that there was a significant difference in PTV coverage between 2 plans. The doses to various OARs showed a nonsignificant increase in the plan sum. The correction of translational setup errors is essential for IGRT treatment in terms of delivery of planned optimal doses to target volume.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4871004
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48710042016-05-23 Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy Kaur, Inderjit Rawat, Sheh Ahlawat, Parveen Kakria, Anjali Gupta, Gourav Saxena, Upasna Mishra, Manindra Bhushan J Med Phys Original Article To assess and analyze the impact of setup uncertainties on target volume coverage and doses to organs at risk (OAR) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Translational setup errors in 25 HNC patients were observed by kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (kV CBCT). Two plans were generated. Plan one – the original plan which was the initially optimized and approved plan of the patient. All patients were treated according to their respective approved plans at a defined isocenter. Plan two – the plan sum which was the sum of all plans recalculated at a different isocenter according to setup errors in x, y, and z-direction. Plan sum was created to evaluate doses that would have been received by planning target volume (PTV) and OARs if setup errors were not corrected. These 2 plans were analyzed and compared in terms of target volume coverage and doses to OARs. A total 503 kV CBCT images were acquired for evaluation of setup errors in 25 HNC patients. The systematic (mean) and random errors (standard deviation) combined for 25 patients in x, y, and z directions were 0.15 cm, 0.21 cm, and 0.19 cm and 0.09 cm, 0.12 cm, and 0.09 cm, respectively. The study showed that there was a significant difference in PTV coverage between 2 plans. The doses to various OARs showed a nonsignificant increase in the plan sum. The correction of translational setup errors is essential for IGRT treatment in terms of delivery of planned optimal doses to target volume. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4871004/ /pubmed/27217627 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.181640 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kaur, Inderjit
Rawat, Sheh
Ahlawat, Parveen
Kakria, Anjali
Gupta, Gourav
Saxena, Upasna
Mishra, Manindra Bhushan
Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy
title Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy
title_full Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy
title_fullStr Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy
title_short Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy
title_sort dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871004/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217627
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.181640
work_keys_str_mv AT kaurinderjit dosimetricimpactofsetuperrorsinheadandneckcancerpatientstreatedbyimageguidedradiotherapy
AT rawatsheh dosimetricimpactofsetuperrorsinheadandneckcancerpatientstreatedbyimageguidedradiotherapy
AT ahlawatparveen dosimetricimpactofsetuperrorsinheadandneckcancerpatientstreatedbyimageguidedradiotherapy
AT kakriaanjali dosimetricimpactofsetuperrorsinheadandneckcancerpatientstreatedbyimageguidedradiotherapy
AT guptagourav dosimetricimpactofsetuperrorsinheadandneckcancerpatientstreatedbyimageguidedradiotherapy
AT saxenaupasna dosimetricimpactofsetuperrorsinheadandneckcancerpatientstreatedbyimageguidedradiotherapy
AT mishramanindrabhushan dosimetricimpactofsetuperrorsinheadandneckcancerpatientstreatedbyimageguidedradiotherapy