Cargando…
Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy
To assess and analyze the impact of setup uncertainties on target volume coverage and doses to organs at risk (OAR) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Translational setup errors in 25 HNC patients were observed by kilovoltage cone beam computed tomogr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217627 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.181640 |
_version_ | 1782432537412370432 |
---|---|
author | Kaur, Inderjit Rawat, Sheh Ahlawat, Parveen Kakria, Anjali Gupta, Gourav Saxena, Upasna Mishra, Manindra Bhushan |
author_facet | Kaur, Inderjit Rawat, Sheh Ahlawat, Parveen Kakria, Anjali Gupta, Gourav Saxena, Upasna Mishra, Manindra Bhushan |
author_sort | Kaur, Inderjit |
collection | PubMed |
description | To assess and analyze the impact of setup uncertainties on target volume coverage and doses to organs at risk (OAR) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Translational setup errors in 25 HNC patients were observed by kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (kV CBCT). Two plans were generated. Plan one – the original plan which was the initially optimized and approved plan of the patient. All patients were treated according to their respective approved plans at a defined isocenter. Plan two – the plan sum which was the sum of all plans recalculated at a different isocenter according to setup errors in x, y, and z-direction. Plan sum was created to evaluate doses that would have been received by planning target volume (PTV) and OARs if setup errors were not corrected. These 2 plans were analyzed and compared in terms of target volume coverage and doses to OARs. A total 503 kV CBCT images were acquired for evaluation of setup errors in 25 HNC patients. The systematic (mean) and random errors (standard deviation) combined for 25 patients in x, y, and z directions were 0.15 cm, 0.21 cm, and 0.19 cm and 0.09 cm, 0.12 cm, and 0.09 cm, respectively. The study showed that there was a significant difference in PTV coverage between 2 plans. The doses to various OARs showed a nonsignificant increase in the plan sum. The correction of translational setup errors is essential for IGRT treatment in terms of delivery of planned optimal doses to target volume. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4871004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48710042016-05-23 Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy Kaur, Inderjit Rawat, Sheh Ahlawat, Parveen Kakria, Anjali Gupta, Gourav Saxena, Upasna Mishra, Manindra Bhushan J Med Phys Original Article To assess and analyze the impact of setup uncertainties on target volume coverage and doses to organs at risk (OAR) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). Translational setup errors in 25 HNC patients were observed by kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography (kV CBCT). Two plans were generated. Plan one – the original plan which was the initially optimized and approved plan of the patient. All patients were treated according to their respective approved plans at a defined isocenter. Plan two – the plan sum which was the sum of all plans recalculated at a different isocenter according to setup errors in x, y, and z-direction. Plan sum was created to evaluate doses that would have been received by planning target volume (PTV) and OARs if setup errors were not corrected. These 2 plans were analyzed and compared in terms of target volume coverage and doses to OARs. A total 503 kV CBCT images were acquired for evaluation of setup errors in 25 HNC patients. The systematic (mean) and random errors (standard deviation) combined for 25 patients in x, y, and z directions were 0.15 cm, 0.21 cm, and 0.19 cm and 0.09 cm, 0.12 cm, and 0.09 cm, respectively. The study showed that there was a significant difference in PTV coverage between 2 plans. The doses to various OARs showed a nonsignificant increase in the plan sum. The correction of translational setup errors is essential for IGRT treatment in terms of delivery of planned optimal doses to target volume. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4871004/ /pubmed/27217627 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.181640 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Medical Physics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kaur, Inderjit Rawat, Sheh Ahlawat, Parveen Kakria, Anjali Gupta, Gourav Saxena, Upasna Mishra, Manindra Bhushan Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy |
title | Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy |
title_full | Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy |
title_short | Dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy |
title_sort | dosimetric impact of setup errors in head and neck cancer patients treated by image-guided radiotherapy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217627 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.181640 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaurinderjit dosimetricimpactofsetuperrorsinheadandneckcancerpatientstreatedbyimageguidedradiotherapy AT rawatsheh dosimetricimpactofsetuperrorsinheadandneckcancerpatientstreatedbyimageguidedradiotherapy AT ahlawatparveen dosimetricimpactofsetuperrorsinheadandneckcancerpatientstreatedbyimageguidedradiotherapy AT kakriaanjali dosimetricimpactofsetuperrorsinheadandneckcancerpatientstreatedbyimageguidedradiotherapy AT guptagourav dosimetricimpactofsetuperrorsinheadandneckcancerpatientstreatedbyimageguidedradiotherapy AT saxenaupasna dosimetricimpactofsetuperrorsinheadandneckcancerpatientstreatedbyimageguidedradiotherapy AT mishramanindrabhushan dosimetricimpactofsetuperrorsinheadandneckcancerpatientstreatedbyimageguidedradiotherapy |