Cargando…

Combining fractional polynomial model building with multiple imputation

Multivariable fractional polynomial (MFP) models are commonly used in medical research. The datasets in which MFP models are applied often contain covariates with missing values. To handle the missing values, we describe methods for combining multiple imputation with MFP modelling, considering in tu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Tim P., White, Ian R., Carpenter, James R., Stanworth, Simon J., Royston, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26095614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.6553
_version_ 1782432562403082240
author Morris, Tim P.
White, Ian R.
Carpenter, James R.
Stanworth, Simon J.
Royston, Patrick
author_facet Morris, Tim P.
White, Ian R.
Carpenter, James R.
Stanworth, Simon J.
Royston, Patrick
author_sort Morris, Tim P.
collection PubMed
description Multivariable fractional polynomial (MFP) models are commonly used in medical research. The datasets in which MFP models are applied often contain covariates with missing values. To handle the missing values, we describe methods for combining multiple imputation with MFP modelling, considering in turn three issues: first, how to impute so that the imputation model does not favour certain fractional polynomial (FP) models over others; second, how to estimate the FP exponents in multiply imputed data; and third, how to choose between models of differing complexity. Two imputation methods are outlined for different settings. For model selection, methods based on Wald‐type statistics and weighted likelihood‐ratio tests are proposed and evaluated in simulation studies. The Wald‐based method is very slightly better at estimating FP exponents. Type I error rates are very similar for both methods, although slightly less well controlled than analysis of complete records; however, there is potential for substantial gains in power over the analysis of complete records. We illustrate the two methods in a dataset from five trauma registries for which a prognostic model has previously been published, contrasting the selected models with that obtained by analysing the complete records only. © 2015 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4871237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48712372016-05-18 Combining fractional polynomial model building with multiple imputation Morris, Tim P. White, Ian R. Carpenter, James R. Stanworth, Simon J. Royston, Patrick Stat Med Research Articles Multivariable fractional polynomial (MFP) models are commonly used in medical research. The datasets in which MFP models are applied often contain covariates with missing values. To handle the missing values, we describe methods for combining multiple imputation with MFP modelling, considering in turn three issues: first, how to impute so that the imputation model does not favour certain fractional polynomial (FP) models over others; second, how to estimate the FP exponents in multiply imputed data; and third, how to choose between models of differing complexity. Two imputation methods are outlined for different settings. For model selection, methods based on Wald‐type statistics and weighted likelihood‐ratio tests are proposed and evaluated in simulation studies. The Wald‐based method is very slightly better at estimating FP exponents. Type I error rates are very similar for both methods, although slightly less well controlled than analysis of complete records; however, there is potential for substantial gains in power over the analysis of complete records. We illustrate the two methods in a dataset from five trauma registries for which a prognostic model has previously been published, contrasting the selected models with that obtained by analysing the complete records only. © 2015 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-06-10 2015-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4871237/ /pubmed/26095614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.6553 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Statistics in Medicine Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Morris, Tim P.
White, Ian R.
Carpenter, James R.
Stanworth, Simon J.
Royston, Patrick
Combining fractional polynomial model building with multiple imputation
title Combining fractional polynomial model building with multiple imputation
title_full Combining fractional polynomial model building with multiple imputation
title_fullStr Combining fractional polynomial model building with multiple imputation
title_full_unstemmed Combining fractional polynomial model building with multiple imputation
title_short Combining fractional polynomial model building with multiple imputation
title_sort combining fractional polynomial model building with multiple imputation
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26095614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.6553
work_keys_str_mv AT morristimp combiningfractionalpolynomialmodelbuildingwithmultipleimputation
AT whiteianr combiningfractionalpolynomialmodelbuildingwithmultipleimputation
AT carpenterjamesr combiningfractionalpolynomialmodelbuildingwithmultipleimputation
AT stanworthsimonj combiningfractionalpolynomialmodelbuildingwithmultipleimputation
AT roystonpatrick combiningfractionalpolynomialmodelbuildingwithmultipleimputation