Cargando…

Can the success of structured therapy for giggle incontinence be predicted?

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate possible factors that can guide the clinician to predict potential cases refractoriness to medical treatment for giggle incontinence (GI) and to examine the effectiveness of different treatment modalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of 48 children referred to pediatric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Telli, Onur, Hamidi, Nurullah, Kayis, Aytac, Suer, Evren, Soygur, Tarkan, Burgu, Berk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27256188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0560
_version_ 1782432581725192192
author Telli, Onur
Hamidi, Nurullah
Kayis, Aytac
Suer, Evren
Soygur, Tarkan
Burgu, Berk
author_facet Telli, Onur
Hamidi, Nurullah
Kayis, Aytac
Suer, Evren
Soygur, Tarkan
Burgu, Berk
author_sort Telli, Onur
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To evaluate possible factors that can guide the clinician to predict potential cases refractoriness to medical treatment for giggle incontinence (GI) and to examine the effectiveness of different treatment modalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of 48 children referred to pediatric urology outpatient clinic between 2000 and 2013 diagnosed as GI were reviewed. Mean age, follow-up, GI frequency, associated symptoms, medical and family history were noted. Incontinence frequency differed between several per day to less than once weekly. Children were evaluated with uroflowmetry-electromyography and post-void residual urine. Clinical success was characterized as a full or partial response, or nonresponse as defined by the International Children's Continence Society. Univariate analysis was used to find potential factors including age, sex, familial history, GI frequency, treatment modality and dysfunctional voiding to predict children who would possibly not respond to treatment. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 8.4 years (range 5 to 16). Mean follow-up time and mean duration of asymptomatic period were noted as 6.7±1.4 years and 14.2±2.3 months respectively. While 12 patients were treated with only behavioral urotherapy (Group-1), 11 patients were treated with alpha-adrenergic blockers and behavioral urotherapy (Group-2) and 18 patients with methylphenidate and behavioral urotherapy (Group-3). Giggle incontinence was refractory to eight children in-group 1; six children in-group 2 and eight children in-group 3. Daily GI frequency and dysfunctional voiding diagnosed on uroflowmetry-EMG were found as outstanding predictive factors for resistance to treatment modalities. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of therapies for GI have more than 50% failure rate and a standard treatment for GI has not been established. The use of medications to treat these patients would not be recommended, as they appear to add no benefit to symptoms and may introduce severe adverse effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4871395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48713952016-05-19 Can the success of structured therapy for giggle incontinence be predicted? Telli, Onur Hamidi, Nurullah Kayis, Aytac Suer, Evren Soygur, Tarkan Burgu, Berk Int Braz J Urol Original Article INTRODUCTION: To evaluate possible factors that can guide the clinician to predict potential cases refractoriness to medical treatment for giggle incontinence (GI) and to examine the effectiveness of different treatment modalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of 48 children referred to pediatric urology outpatient clinic between 2000 and 2013 diagnosed as GI were reviewed. Mean age, follow-up, GI frequency, associated symptoms, medical and family history were noted. Incontinence frequency differed between several per day to less than once weekly. Children were evaluated with uroflowmetry-electromyography and post-void residual urine. Clinical success was characterized as a full or partial response, or nonresponse as defined by the International Children's Continence Society. Univariate analysis was used to find potential factors including age, sex, familial history, GI frequency, treatment modality and dysfunctional voiding to predict children who would possibly not respond to treatment. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 8.4 years (range 5 to 16). Mean follow-up time and mean duration of asymptomatic period were noted as 6.7±1.4 years and 14.2±2.3 months respectively. While 12 patients were treated with only behavioral urotherapy (Group-1), 11 patients were treated with alpha-adrenergic blockers and behavioral urotherapy (Group-2) and 18 patients with methylphenidate and behavioral urotherapy (Group-3). Giggle incontinence was refractory to eight children in-group 1; six children in-group 2 and eight children in-group 3. Daily GI frequency and dysfunctional voiding diagnosed on uroflowmetry-EMG were found as outstanding predictive factors for resistance to treatment modalities. CONCLUSIONS: A variety of therapies for GI have more than 50% failure rate and a standard treatment for GI has not been established. The use of medications to treat these patients would not be recommended, as they appear to add no benefit to symptoms and may introduce severe adverse effects. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4871395/ /pubmed/27256188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0560 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Telli, Onur
Hamidi, Nurullah
Kayis, Aytac
Suer, Evren
Soygur, Tarkan
Burgu, Berk
Can the success of structured therapy for giggle incontinence be predicted?
title Can the success of structured therapy for giggle incontinence be predicted?
title_full Can the success of structured therapy for giggle incontinence be predicted?
title_fullStr Can the success of structured therapy for giggle incontinence be predicted?
title_full_unstemmed Can the success of structured therapy for giggle incontinence be predicted?
title_short Can the success of structured therapy for giggle incontinence be predicted?
title_sort can the success of structured therapy for giggle incontinence be predicted?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27256188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0560
work_keys_str_mv AT tellionur canthesuccessofstructuredtherapyforgiggleincontinencebepredicted
AT hamidinurullah canthesuccessofstructuredtherapyforgiggleincontinencebepredicted
AT kayisaytac canthesuccessofstructuredtherapyforgiggleincontinencebepredicted
AT suerevren canthesuccessofstructuredtherapyforgiggleincontinencebepredicted
AT soygurtarkan canthesuccessofstructuredtherapyforgiggleincontinencebepredicted
AT burguberk canthesuccessofstructuredtherapyforgiggleincontinencebepredicted