Cargando…

A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms

BACKGROUND: The impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on type 2 diabetes mellitus is thought to result from upper and/or lower gut hormone alterations. Evidence supporting these mechanisms is incomplete, in part because of limitations in relevant bariatric-surgery animal models, specifically the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simianu, Vlad V., Sham, Jonathan G., Wright, Andrew S., Stewart, Skye D., Alloosh, Mouhamad, Sturek, Michael, Cummings, David E., Flum, David R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27213116
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ss.2015.68050
_version_ 1782432628572422144
author Simianu, Vlad V.
Sham, Jonathan G.
Wright, Andrew S.
Stewart, Skye D.
Alloosh, Mouhamad
Sturek, Michael
Cummings, David E.
Flum, David R.
author_facet Simianu, Vlad V.
Sham, Jonathan G.
Wright, Andrew S.
Stewart, Skye D.
Alloosh, Mouhamad
Sturek, Michael
Cummings, David E.
Flum, David R.
author_sort Simianu, Vlad V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on type 2 diabetes mellitus is thought to result from upper and/or lower gut hormone alterations. Evidence supporting these mechanisms is incomplete, in part because of limitations in relevant bariatric-surgery animal models, specifically the lack of naturally insulin-resistant large animals. With overfeeding, Ossabaw swine develop a robust metabolic syndrome, and may be suitable for studying post-surgical physiology. Whether bariatric surgery is feasible in these animals with acceptable survival is unknown. METHODS: Thirty-two Ossabaws were fed a high-fat, high-cholesterol diet to induce obesity and insulin resistance. These animals were assigned to RYGB (n = 8), RYGB with vagotomy (RYGB-V, n = 5), gastrojejunostomy (GJ, n = 10), GJ with duodenal exclusion (GJD, n = 7), or sham operation (n = 2) and were euthanized 60 days post-operatively. Post-operative changes in weight and food intake are reported. RESULTS: Survival to scheduled necropsy among surgical groups was 77%, living an average of 57 days post-operatively. Cardiac arrest under anesthesia occurred in 4 pigs. Greatest weight loss (18.0% ± 6%) and food intake decrease (57.0% ± 20%) occurred following RYGB while animals undergoing RYGB-V showed only 6.6% ± 3% weight loss despite 50.8% ± 25% food intake decrease. GJ (12.7% ± 4%) and GJD (1.2% ± 1%) pigs gained weight, but less than sham controls (13.4% ± 10%). CONCLUSIONS: A survival model of metabolic surgical procedures is feasible, leads to significant weight loss, and provides the opportunity to evaluate new interventions and subtle variations in surgical technique (e.g. vagus nerve sparing) that may provide new mechanistic insights.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4871691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48716912016-05-18 A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms Simianu, Vlad V. Sham, Jonathan G. Wright, Andrew S. Stewart, Skye D. Alloosh, Mouhamad Sturek, Michael Cummings, David E. Flum, David R. Surg Sci Article BACKGROUND: The impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on type 2 diabetes mellitus is thought to result from upper and/or lower gut hormone alterations. Evidence supporting these mechanisms is incomplete, in part because of limitations in relevant bariatric-surgery animal models, specifically the lack of naturally insulin-resistant large animals. With overfeeding, Ossabaw swine develop a robust metabolic syndrome, and may be suitable for studying post-surgical physiology. Whether bariatric surgery is feasible in these animals with acceptable survival is unknown. METHODS: Thirty-two Ossabaws were fed a high-fat, high-cholesterol diet to induce obesity and insulin resistance. These animals were assigned to RYGB (n = 8), RYGB with vagotomy (RYGB-V, n = 5), gastrojejunostomy (GJ, n = 10), GJ with duodenal exclusion (GJD, n = 7), or sham operation (n = 2) and were euthanized 60 days post-operatively. Post-operative changes in weight and food intake are reported. RESULTS: Survival to scheduled necropsy among surgical groups was 77%, living an average of 57 days post-operatively. Cardiac arrest under anesthesia occurred in 4 pigs. Greatest weight loss (18.0% ± 6%) and food intake decrease (57.0% ± 20%) occurred following RYGB while animals undergoing RYGB-V showed only 6.6% ± 3% weight loss despite 50.8% ± 25% food intake decrease. GJ (12.7% ± 4%) and GJD (1.2% ± 1%) pigs gained weight, but less than sham controls (13.4% ± 10%). CONCLUSIONS: A survival model of metabolic surgical procedures is feasible, leads to significant weight loss, and provides the opportunity to evaluate new interventions and subtle variations in surgical technique (e.g. vagus nerve sparing) that may provide new mechanistic insights. 2015-07-24 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4871691/ /pubmed/27213116 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ss.2015.68050 Text en This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Simianu, Vlad V.
Sham, Jonathan G.
Wright, Andrew S.
Stewart, Skye D.
Alloosh, Mouhamad
Sturek, Michael
Cummings, David E.
Flum, David R.
A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms
title A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms
title_full A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms
title_fullStr A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms
title_short A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms
title_sort large animal survival model to evaluate bariatric surgery mechanisms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27213116
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ss.2015.68050
work_keys_str_mv AT simianuvladv alargeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms
AT shamjonathang alargeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms
AT wrightandrews alargeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms
AT stewartskyed alargeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms
AT allooshmouhamad alargeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms
AT sturekmichael alargeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms
AT cummingsdavide alargeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms
AT flumdavidr alargeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms
AT simianuvladv largeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms
AT shamjonathang largeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms
AT wrightandrews largeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms
AT stewartskyed largeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms
AT allooshmouhamad largeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms
AT sturekmichael largeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms
AT cummingsdavide largeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms
AT flumdavidr largeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms