Cargando…
A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms
BACKGROUND: The impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on type 2 diabetes mellitus is thought to result from upper and/or lower gut hormone alterations. Evidence supporting these mechanisms is incomplete, in part because of limitations in relevant bariatric-surgery animal models, specifically the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27213116 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ss.2015.68050 |
_version_ | 1782432628572422144 |
---|---|
author | Simianu, Vlad V. Sham, Jonathan G. Wright, Andrew S. Stewart, Skye D. Alloosh, Mouhamad Sturek, Michael Cummings, David E. Flum, David R. |
author_facet | Simianu, Vlad V. Sham, Jonathan G. Wright, Andrew S. Stewart, Skye D. Alloosh, Mouhamad Sturek, Michael Cummings, David E. Flum, David R. |
author_sort | Simianu, Vlad V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on type 2 diabetes mellitus is thought to result from upper and/or lower gut hormone alterations. Evidence supporting these mechanisms is incomplete, in part because of limitations in relevant bariatric-surgery animal models, specifically the lack of naturally insulin-resistant large animals. With overfeeding, Ossabaw swine develop a robust metabolic syndrome, and may be suitable for studying post-surgical physiology. Whether bariatric surgery is feasible in these animals with acceptable survival is unknown. METHODS: Thirty-two Ossabaws were fed a high-fat, high-cholesterol diet to induce obesity and insulin resistance. These animals were assigned to RYGB (n = 8), RYGB with vagotomy (RYGB-V, n = 5), gastrojejunostomy (GJ, n = 10), GJ with duodenal exclusion (GJD, n = 7), or sham operation (n = 2) and were euthanized 60 days post-operatively. Post-operative changes in weight and food intake are reported. RESULTS: Survival to scheduled necropsy among surgical groups was 77%, living an average of 57 days post-operatively. Cardiac arrest under anesthesia occurred in 4 pigs. Greatest weight loss (18.0% ± 6%) and food intake decrease (57.0% ± 20%) occurred following RYGB while animals undergoing RYGB-V showed only 6.6% ± 3% weight loss despite 50.8% ± 25% food intake decrease. GJ (12.7% ± 4%) and GJD (1.2% ± 1%) pigs gained weight, but less than sham controls (13.4% ± 10%). CONCLUSIONS: A survival model of metabolic surgical procedures is feasible, leads to significant weight loss, and provides the opportunity to evaluate new interventions and subtle variations in surgical technique (e.g. vagus nerve sparing) that may provide new mechanistic insights. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4871691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48716912016-05-18 A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms Simianu, Vlad V. Sham, Jonathan G. Wright, Andrew S. Stewart, Skye D. Alloosh, Mouhamad Sturek, Michael Cummings, David E. Flum, David R. Surg Sci Article BACKGROUND: The impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on type 2 diabetes mellitus is thought to result from upper and/or lower gut hormone alterations. Evidence supporting these mechanisms is incomplete, in part because of limitations in relevant bariatric-surgery animal models, specifically the lack of naturally insulin-resistant large animals. With overfeeding, Ossabaw swine develop a robust metabolic syndrome, and may be suitable for studying post-surgical physiology. Whether bariatric surgery is feasible in these animals with acceptable survival is unknown. METHODS: Thirty-two Ossabaws were fed a high-fat, high-cholesterol diet to induce obesity and insulin resistance. These animals were assigned to RYGB (n = 8), RYGB with vagotomy (RYGB-V, n = 5), gastrojejunostomy (GJ, n = 10), GJ with duodenal exclusion (GJD, n = 7), or sham operation (n = 2) and were euthanized 60 days post-operatively. Post-operative changes in weight and food intake are reported. RESULTS: Survival to scheduled necropsy among surgical groups was 77%, living an average of 57 days post-operatively. Cardiac arrest under anesthesia occurred in 4 pigs. Greatest weight loss (18.0% ± 6%) and food intake decrease (57.0% ± 20%) occurred following RYGB while animals undergoing RYGB-V showed only 6.6% ± 3% weight loss despite 50.8% ± 25% food intake decrease. GJ (12.7% ± 4%) and GJD (1.2% ± 1%) pigs gained weight, but less than sham controls (13.4% ± 10%). CONCLUSIONS: A survival model of metabolic surgical procedures is feasible, leads to significant weight loss, and provides the opportunity to evaluate new interventions and subtle variations in surgical technique (e.g. vagus nerve sparing) that may provide new mechanistic insights. 2015-07-24 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4871691/ /pubmed/27213116 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ss.2015.68050 Text en This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Simianu, Vlad V. Sham, Jonathan G. Wright, Andrew S. Stewart, Skye D. Alloosh, Mouhamad Sturek, Michael Cummings, David E. Flum, David R. A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms |
title | A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms |
title_full | A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms |
title_fullStr | A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms |
title_full_unstemmed | A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms |
title_short | A Large Animal Survival Model to Evaluate Bariatric Surgery Mechanisms |
title_sort | large animal survival model to evaluate bariatric surgery mechanisms |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27213116 http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ss.2015.68050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simianuvladv alargeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms AT shamjonathang alargeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms AT wrightandrews alargeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms AT stewartskyed alargeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms AT allooshmouhamad alargeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms AT sturekmichael alargeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms AT cummingsdavide alargeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms AT flumdavidr alargeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms AT simianuvladv largeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms AT shamjonathang largeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms AT wrightandrews largeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms AT stewartskyed largeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms AT allooshmouhamad largeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms AT sturekmichael largeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms AT cummingsdavide largeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms AT flumdavidr largeanimalsurvivalmodeltoevaluatebariatricsurgerymechanisms |