Cargando…

Comparison of Predictive Models for the Early Diagnosis of Diabetes

OBJECTIVES: This study develops neural network models to improve the prediction of diabetes using clinical and lifestyle characteristics. Prediction models were developed using a combination of approaches and concepts. METHODS: We used memetic algorithms to update weights and to improve prediction a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jahani, Meysam, Mahdavi, Mahdi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Medical Informatics 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27200219
http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2016.22.2.95
_version_ 1782432637203251200
author Jahani, Meysam
Mahdavi, Mahdi
author_facet Jahani, Meysam
Mahdavi, Mahdi
author_sort Jahani, Meysam
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study develops neural network models to improve the prediction of diabetes using clinical and lifestyle characteristics. Prediction models were developed using a combination of approaches and concepts. METHODS: We used memetic algorithms to update weights and to improve prediction accuracy of models. In the first step, the optimum amount for neural network parameters such as momentum rate, transfer function, and error function were obtained through trial and error and based on the results of previous studies. In the second step, optimum parameters were applied to memetic algorithms in order to improve the accuracy of prediction. This preliminary analysis showed that the accuracy of neural networks is 88%. In the third step, the accuracy of neural network models was improved using a memetic algorithm and resulted model was compared with a logistic regression model using a confusion matrix and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). RESULTS: The memetic algorithm improved the accuracy from 88.0% to 93.2%. We also found that memetic algorithm had a higher accuracy than the model from the genetic algorithm and a regression model. Among models, the regression model has the least accuracy. For the memetic algorithm model the amount of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and ROC are 96.2, 95.3, 93.8, 92.4, and 0.958 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide a basis to design a Decision Support System for risk management and planning of care for individuals at risk of diabetes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4871851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Korean Society of Medical Informatics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48718512016-05-19 Comparison of Predictive Models for the Early Diagnosis of Diabetes Jahani, Meysam Mahdavi, Mahdi Healthc Inform Res Original Article OBJECTIVES: This study develops neural network models to improve the prediction of diabetes using clinical and lifestyle characteristics. Prediction models were developed using a combination of approaches and concepts. METHODS: We used memetic algorithms to update weights and to improve prediction accuracy of models. In the first step, the optimum amount for neural network parameters such as momentum rate, transfer function, and error function were obtained through trial and error and based on the results of previous studies. In the second step, optimum parameters were applied to memetic algorithms in order to improve the accuracy of prediction. This preliminary analysis showed that the accuracy of neural networks is 88%. In the third step, the accuracy of neural network models was improved using a memetic algorithm and resulted model was compared with a logistic regression model using a confusion matrix and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). RESULTS: The memetic algorithm improved the accuracy from 88.0% to 93.2%. We also found that memetic algorithm had a higher accuracy than the model from the genetic algorithm and a regression model. Among models, the regression model has the least accuracy. For the memetic algorithm model the amount of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and ROC are 96.2, 95.3, 93.8, 92.4, and 0.958 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide a basis to design a Decision Support System for risk management and planning of care for individuals at risk of diabetes. Korean Society of Medical Informatics 2016-04 2016-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4871851/ /pubmed/27200219 http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2016.22.2.95 Text en © 2016 The Korean Society of Medical Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jahani, Meysam
Mahdavi, Mahdi
Comparison of Predictive Models for the Early Diagnosis of Diabetes
title Comparison of Predictive Models for the Early Diagnosis of Diabetes
title_full Comparison of Predictive Models for the Early Diagnosis of Diabetes
title_fullStr Comparison of Predictive Models for the Early Diagnosis of Diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Predictive Models for the Early Diagnosis of Diabetes
title_short Comparison of Predictive Models for the Early Diagnosis of Diabetes
title_sort comparison of predictive models for the early diagnosis of diabetes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27200219
http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2016.22.2.95
work_keys_str_mv AT jahanimeysam comparisonofpredictivemodelsfortheearlydiagnosisofdiabetes
AT mahdavimahdi comparisonofpredictivemodelsfortheearlydiagnosisofdiabetes