Cargando…

The risk of emergency cesarean section after failure of vaginal delivery according to prepregnancy body mass index or gestational weight gain by the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of emergency cesarean section according to the prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain per the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from 2,765 women with singleton full-term births (2009 to 2012) who a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwon, Ha Yan, Kwon, Ja-Young, Park, Yong Won, Kim, Young-Han
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Korean Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endocrinology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimal Invasive Surgery; Korean Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine; Korean Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology; Korean Urogynecologic Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27200306
http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2016.59.3.169
_version_ 1782432654841348096
author Kwon, Ha Yan
Kwon, Ja-Young
Park, Yong Won
Kim, Young-Han
author_facet Kwon, Ha Yan
Kwon, Ja-Young
Park, Yong Won
Kim, Young-Han
author_sort Kwon, Ha Yan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of emergency cesarean section according to the prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain per the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from 2,765 women with singleton full-term births (2009 to 2012) who attempted a vaginal delivery was conducted. Pregnancies with preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, diabetes, planned cesarean section, placenta previa, or cesarean section due to fetal anomalies or intrauterine growth restriction were excluded. Odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) for emergency cesarean section were calculated after adjusting for prepregnancy BMI or gestational weight gain. RESULTS: Three-hundred and fifty nine (13.0%) women underwent emergency cesarean section. The adjusted OR for overweight, obese, and extremely obese women indicated a significantly increased risk of cesarean delivery. Gestational weight gain by Institute of Medicine guidelines was not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. However, inadequate and excessive weight gain in obese women was highly associated with an increased risk of emergency cesarean section, compared to these in normal BMI (OR, 5.56; 95% CI, 1.36 to 22.72; OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.05 to 12.54; respectively), while there was no significant difference between normal BMI and obese women with adequate weight gain. CONCLUSION: Obese women should be provided special advice before and during pregnancy for controlling weight and careful consideration should be needed at the time of vaginal delivery to avoid emergency cesarean section.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4871932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Korean Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endocrinology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimal Invasive Surgery; Korean Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine; Korean Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology; Korean Urogynecologic Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48719322016-05-19 The risk of emergency cesarean section after failure of vaginal delivery according to prepregnancy body mass index or gestational weight gain by the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines Kwon, Ha Yan Kwon, Ja-Young Park, Yong Won Kim, Young-Han Obstet Gynecol Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of emergency cesarean section according to the prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain per the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from 2,765 women with singleton full-term births (2009 to 2012) who attempted a vaginal delivery was conducted. Pregnancies with preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, diabetes, planned cesarean section, placenta previa, or cesarean section due to fetal anomalies or intrauterine growth restriction were excluded. Odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) for emergency cesarean section were calculated after adjusting for prepregnancy BMI or gestational weight gain. RESULTS: Three-hundred and fifty nine (13.0%) women underwent emergency cesarean section. The adjusted OR for overweight, obese, and extremely obese women indicated a significantly increased risk of cesarean delivery. Gestational weight gain by Institute of Medicine guidelines was not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery. However, inadequate and excessive weight gain in obese women was highly associated with an increased risk of emergency cesarean section, compared to these in normal BMI (OR, 5.56; 95% CI, 1.36 to 22.72; OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.05 to 12.54; respectively), while there was no significant difference between normal BMI and obese women with adequate weight gain. CONCLUSION: Obese women should be provided special advice before and during pregnancy for controlling weight and careful consideration should be needed at the time of vaginal delivery to avoid emergency cesarean section. Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Korean Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endocrinology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy and Minimal Invasive Surgery; Korean Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine; Korean Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology; Korean Urogynecologic Society 2016-05 2016-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4871932/ /pubmed/27200306 http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2016.59.3.169 Text en Copyright © 2016 Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ Articles published in Obstet Gynecol Sci are open-access, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kwon, Ha Yan
Kwon, Ja-Young
Park, Yong Won
Kim, Young-Han
The risk of emergency cesarean section after failure of vaginal delivery according to prepregnancy body mass index or gestational weight gain by the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines
title The risk of emergency cesarean section after failure of vaginal delivery according to prepregnancy body mass index or gestational weight gain by the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines
title_full The risk of emergency cesarean section after failure of vaginal delivery according to prepregnancy body mass index or gestational weight gain by the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines
title_fullStr The risk of emergency cesarean section after failure of vaginal delivery according to prepregnancy body mass index or gestational weight gain by the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines
title_full_unstemmed The risk of emergency cesarean section after failure of vaginal delivery according to prepregnancy body mass index or gestational weight gain by the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines
title_short The risk of emergency cesarean section after failure of vaginal delivery according to prepregnancy body mass index or gestational weight gain by the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines
title_sort risk of emergency cesarean section after failure of vaginal delivery according to prepregnancy body mass index or gestational weight gain by the 2009 institute of medicine guidelines
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4871932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27200306
http://dx.doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2016.59.3.169
work_keys_str_mv AT kwonhayan theriskofemergencycesareansectionafterfailureofvaginaldeliveryaccordingtoprepregnancybodymassindexorgestationalweightgainbythe2009instituteofmedicineguidelines
AT kwonjayoung theriskofemergencycesareansectionafterfailureofvaginaldeliveryaccordingtoprepregnancybodymassindexorgestationalweightgainbythe2009instituteofmedicineguidelines
AT parkyongwon theriskofemergencycesareansectionafterfailureofvaginaldeliveryaccordingtoprepregnancybodymassindexorgestationalweightgainbythe2009instituteofmedicineguidelines
AT kimyounghan theriskofemergencycesareansectionafterfailureofvaginaldeliveryaccordingtoprepregnancybodymassindexorgestationalweightgainbythe2009instituteofmedicineguidelines
AT kwonhayan riskofemergencycesareansectionafterfailureofvaginaldeliveryaccordingtoprepregnancybodymassindexorgestationalweightgainbythe2009instituteofmedicineguidelines
AT kwonjayoung riskofemergencycesareansectionafterfailureofvaginaldeliveryaccordingtoprepregnancybodymassindexorgestationalweightgainbythe2009instituteofmedicineguidelines
AT parkyongwon riskofemergencycesareansectionafterfailureofvaginaldeliveryaccordingtoprepregnancybodymassindexorgestationalweightgainbythe2009instituteofmedicineguidelines
AT kimyounghan riskofemergencycesareansectionafterfailureofvaginaldeliveryaccordingtoprepregnancybodymassindexorgestationalweightgainbythe2009instituteofmedicineguidelines