Cargando…

A knowledge synthesis of culturally- and spiritually-sensitive end-of-life care: findings from a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Multiple factors influence the end-of-life (EoL) care and experience of poor quality services by culturally- and spiritually-diverse groups. Access to EoL services e.g. health and social supports at home or in hospices is difficult for ethnic minorities compared to white European groups....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fang, Mei Lan, Sixsmith, Judith, Sinclair, Shane, Horst, Glen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4872365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27193395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0282-6
_version_ 1782432715150196736
author Fang, Mei Lan
Sixsmith, Judith
Sinclair, Shane
Horst, Glen
author_facet Fang, Mei Lan
Sixsmith, Judith
Sinclair, Shane
Horst, Glen
author_sort Fang, Mei Lan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple factors influence the end-of-life (EoL) care and experience of poor quality services by culturally- and spiritually-diverse groups. Access to EoL services e.g. health and social supports at home or in hospices is difficult for ethnic minorities compared to white European groups. A tool is required to empower patients and families to access culturally-safe care. This review was undertaken by the Canadian Virtual Hospice as a foundation for this tool. METHODS: To explore attitudes, behaviours and patterns to utilization of EoL care by culturally and spiritually diverse groups and identify gaps in EoL care practice and delivery methods, a scoping review and thematic analysis of article content was conducted. Fourteen electronic databases and websites were searched between June–August 2014 to identify English-language peer-reviewed publications and grey literature (including reports and other online resources) published between 2004–2014. RESULTS: The search identified barriers and enablers at the systems, community and personal/family levels. Primary barriers include: cultural differences between healthcare providers; persons approaching EoL and family members; under-utilization of culturally-sensitive models designed to improve EoL care; language barriers; lack of awareness of cultural and religious diversity issues; exclusion of families in the decision-making process; personal racial and religious discrimination; and lack of culturally-tailored EoL information to facilitate decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights that most research has focused on decision-making. There were fewer studies exploring different cultural and spiritual experiences at the EoL and interventions to improve EoL care. Interventions evaluated were largely educational in nature rather than service oriented. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0282-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4872365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48723652016-05-20 A knowledge synthesis of culturally- and spiritually-sensitive end-of-life care: findings from a scoping review Fang, Mei Lan Sixsmith, Judith Sinclair, Shane Horst, Glen BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Multiple factors influence the end-of-life (EoL) care and experience of poor quality services by culturally- and spiritually-diverse groups. Access to EoL services e.g. health and social supports at home or in hospices is difficult for ethnic minorities compared to white European groups. A tool is required to empower patients and families to access culturally-safe care. This review was undertaken by the Canadian Virtual Hospice as a foundation for this tool. METHODS: To explore attitudes, behaviours and patterns to utilization of EoL care by culturally and spiritually diverse groups and identify gaps in EoL care practice and delivery methods, a scoping review and thematic analysis of article content was conducted. Fourteen electronic databases and websites were searched between June–August 2014 to identify English-language peer-reviewed publications and grey literature (including reports and other online resources) published between 2004–2014. RESULTS: The search identified barriers and enablers at the systems, community and personal/family levels. Primary barriers include: cultural differences between healthcare providers; persons approaching EoL and family members; under-utilization of culturally-sensitive models designed to improve EoL care; language barriers; lack of awareness of cultural and religious diversity issues; exclusion of families in the decision-making process; personal racial and religious discrimination; and lack of culturally-tailored EoL information to facilitate decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights that most research has focused on decision-making. There were fewer studies exploring different cultural and spiritual experiences at the EoL and interventions to improve EoL care. Interventions evaluated were largely educational in nature rather than service oriented. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0282-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4872365/ /pubmed/27193395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0282-6 Text en © Fang et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fang, Mei Lan
Sixsmith, Judith
Sinclair, Shane
Horst, Glen
A knowledge synthesis of culturally- and spiritually-sensitive end-of-life care: findings from a scoping review
title A knowledge synthesis of culturally- and spiritually-sensitive end-of-life care: findings from a scoping review
title_full A knowledge synthesis of culturally- and spiritually-sensitive end-of-life care: findings from a scoping review
title_fullStr A knowledge synthesis of culturally- and spiritually-sensitive end-of-life care: findings from a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed A knowledge synthesis of culturally- and spiritually-sensitive end-of-life care: findings from a scoping review
title_short A knowledge synthesis of culturally- and spiritually-sensitive end-of-life care: findings from a scoping review
title_sort knowledge synthesis of culturally- and spiritually-sensitive end-of-life care: findings from a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4872365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27193395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0282-6
work_keys_str_mv AT fangmeilan aknowledgesynthesisofculturallyandspirituallysensitiveendoflifecarefindingsfromascopingreview
AT sixsmithjudith aknowledgesynthesisofculturallyandspirituallysensitiveendoflifecarefindingsfromascopingreview
AT sinclairshane aknowledgesynthesisofculturallyandspirituallysensitiveendoflifecarefindingsfromascopingreview
AT horstglen aknowledgesynthesisofculturallyandspirituallysensitiveendoflifecarefindingsfromascopingreview
AT fangmeilan knowledgesynthesisofculturallyandspirituallysensitiveendoflifecarefindingsfromascopingreview
AT sixsmithjudith knowledgesynthesisofculturallyandspirituallysensitiveendoflifecarefindingsfromascopingreview
AT sinclairshane knowledgesynthesisofculturallyandspirituallysensitiveendoflifecarefindingsfromascopingreview
AT horstglen knowledgesynthesisofculturallyandspirituallysensitiveendoflifecarefindingsfromascopingreview