Cargando…
Spontaneous fracture of cranioplastic titanium implants without head trauma in an adult: A case report
INTRODUCTION: The cranioplasty is a classical surgical procedure to repair large skull defects. The prosthesis fracture was one rare complication following cranioplasty, which was only known to happen in traumatic head injury or child growing skull. PRESENTATION OF CASE: In the current report, we do...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4872371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27180320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.04.039 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: The cranioplasty is a classical surgical procedure to repair large skull defects. The prosthesis fracture was one rare complication following cranioplasty, which was only known to happen in traumatic head injury or child growing skull. PRESENTATION OF CASE: In the current report, we documented the first reported case of cranioplasty prosthesis fracture in an adult neurological trauma patient at the proximal pterion point region without head trauma. During the first cranioplasty, due to the cerebromalacia at temporal lobe, patient’s temporalis muscle was not stripped from the dura mater and the prosthesis was anchored outside the temporalis muscle. Thus, no screw was used for anchoring the prosthesis at the basitemporal skull. The prosthesis fracture was observed on 12(th)-month post-surgically at the proximal pterion point region. During the second cranioplasty, the temporalis muscle was semi-partitioned from the back due to cerebromalacia recovery and five screws were used to anchor the prosthesis onto the basitemporal skull. The follow-up result was unremarkable on 21(st)-month post-second-cranioplasty. DISCUSSION: A dynamic load was generated on the prosthesis due to head-pillow contact during sleeping. Via the parietal tuber-temporozygomatic suture line, this inward load generates an outward force at the proximal pterion point region, where became a shearing force locating just right below the lowest screw anchoring in this region. This shearing force eventually led to prosthesis fracture at the proximal pterion point due to the fatigue effect. CONCLUSION: This case presented the importance of prosthesis anchoring location on the skull, especially when temporalis muscle was required to be preserved due to clinical necessity. |
---|