Cargando…
Comparison of apical debris extrusion of two rotary systems and one reciprocating system
BACKGROUND: Postoperative inflammation and endodontic failure occur due to apical extrusion of debris. AIM: To evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris after preparation of straight root canals in extracted human teeth using three rotary systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty single-rooted hum...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4872579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217638 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.181941 |
_version_ | 1782432755273957376 |
---|---|
author | Vivekanandhan, Paramasivam Subbiya, Arunajatesan Mitthra, Suresh Karthick, Arumugam |
author_facet | Vivekanandhan, Paramasivam Subbiya, Arunajatesan Mitthra, Suresh Karthick, Arumugam |
author_sort | Vivekanandhan, Paramasivam |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Postoperative inflammation and endodontic failure occur due to apical extrusion of debris. AIM: To evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris after preparation of straight root canals in extracted human teeth using three rotary systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty single-rooted human teeth with single root canal and apical foramen were selected and randomly divided into three experimental groups (n = 20) according to the rotary system used: Group 1 - ProTaper, Group 2 - Revo-S, Group 3 - WaveOne. Apical enlargement was done up to size 40/0.06 for Groups 1 and 2 and 40/0.08 for Group 3. For debris collection, each tooth was held in a preweighed Eppendorf tube fixed inside a glass vial through rubber plug. After instrumentation, each tooth was separated from the Eppendorf tube and the debris adhering to the root surface was collected by washing the root with 1 mL of bi-distilled water and incubated at 70°C for 5 days. The dry weight of extruded debris was weighed in an electronic balance. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The mean weights of extruded debris were statistically analyzed using GraphPad prism version 6 and the intergroup comparison was done using unpaired t-test. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the mean debris score among all the three groups - ProTaper (0.00065 g), Revo-S (0.00045 g) and WaveOne (0.00089 g). CONCLUSION: Revo-S system was associated with significantly less debris extrusion compared with ProTaper or WaveOne. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4872579 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48725792016-05-23 Comparison of apical debris extrusion of two rotary systems and one reciprocating system Vivekanandhan, Paramasivam Subbiya, Arunajatesan Mitthra, Suresh Karthick, Arumugam J Conserv Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Postoperative inflammation and endodontic failure occur due to apical extrusion of debris. AIM: To evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris after preparation of straight root canals in extracted human teeth using three rotary systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty single-rooted human teeth with single root canal and apical foramen were selected and randomly divided into three experimental groups (n = 20) according to the rotary system used: Group 1 - ProTaper, Group 2 - Revo-S, Group 3 - WaveOne. Apical enlargement was done up to size 40/0.06 for Groups 1 and 2 and 40/0.08 for Group 3. For debris collection, each tooth was held in a preweighed Eppendorf tube fixed inside a glass vial through rubber plug. After instrumentation, each tooth was separated from the Eppendorf tube and the debris adhering to the root surface was collected by washing the root with 1 mL of bi-distilled water and incubated at 70°C for 5 days. The dry weight of extruded debris was weighed in an electronic balance. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The mean weights of extruded debris were statistically analyzed using GraphPad prism version 6 and the intergroup comparison was done using unpaired t-test. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the mean debris score among all the three groups - ProTaper (0.00065 g), Revo-S (0.00045 g) and WaveOne (0.00089 g). CONCLUSION: Revo-S system was associated with significantly less debris extrusion compared with ProTaper or WaveOne. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4872579/ /pubmed/27217638 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.181941 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Vivekanandhan, Paramasivam Subbiya, Arunajatesan Mitthra, Suresh Karthick, Arumugam Comparison of apical debris extrusion of two rotary systems and one reciprocating system |
title | Comparison of apical debris extrusion of two rotary systems and one reciprocating system |
title_full | Comparison of apical debris extrusion of two rotary systems and one reciprocating system |
title_fullStr | Comparison of apical debris extrusion of two rotary systems and one reciprocating system |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of apical debris extrusion of two rotary systems and one reciprocating system |
title_short | Comparison of apical debris extrusion of two rotary systems and one reciprocating system |
title_sort | comparison of apical debris extrusion of two rotary systems and one reciprocating system |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4872579/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217638 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.181941 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vivekanandhanparamasivam comparisonofapicaldebrisextrusionoftworotarysystemsandonereciprocatingsystem AT subbiyaarunajatesan comparisonofapicaldebrisextrusionoftworotarysystemsandonereciprocatingsystem AT mitthrasuresh comparisonofapicaldebrisextrusionoftworotarysystemsandonereciprocatingsystem AT karthickarumugam comparisonofapicaldebrisextrusionoftworotarysystemsandonereciprocatingsystem |