Cargando…

Public private partnership in vascular surgery

OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyze the results of a public-private partnership between the Ministry of Health and a private hospital in a project of assistance and scientific research in the field of endovascular surgery. Methods: The flows, costs and clinical outcomes of patients treated in a the p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mendes, Cynthia de Almeida, Martins, Alexandre de Arruda, Teivelis, Marcelo Passos, Kuzniec, Sérgio, Wolosker, Nelson
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4872947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25295457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082014GS3029
_version_ 1782432806033424384
author Mendes, Cynthia de Almeida
Martins, Alexandre de Arruda
Teivelis, Marcelo Passos
Kuzniec, Sérgio
Wolosker, Nelson
author_facet Mendes, Cynthia de Almeida
Martins, Alexandre de Arruda
Teivelis, Marcelo Passos
Kuzniec, Sérgio
Wolosker, Nelson
author_sort Mendes, Cynthia de Almeida
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyze the results of a public-private partnership between the Ministry of Health and a private hospital in a project of assistance and scientific research in the field of endovascular surgery. Methods: The flows, costs and clinical outcomes of patients treated in a the public-private partnership between April 2012 and July 2013 were analyzed. All patients underwent surgery and stayed at least one day at the intensive care unit of the private hospital. They also participated in a research protocol to compare two intravenous contrast media used in endovascular surgery (iodinated contrast and carbon dioxide). RESULTS: A total of 62 endovascular procedures were performed in 57 patients from the public healthcare system. Hospital and endovascular supplies expenses were significantly higher as compared to the amount paid by the Unified Health System (SUS - Sistema Único de Saúde) in two out of three disease groups studied. Among outpatients, the average interval between appointment and surgery was 15 days and, in hospitalized patients 7 days. All procedures were successful with no conversion to open surgery. The new contrast medium studied - carbon dioxide – was effective and cheaper. CONCLUSION: The waiting time for patients between indication and accomplishment of surgery was significantly reduced. Public-private partnerships can speed up care of patients from public health services, and generate and improve scientific knowledge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4872947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48729472016-08-10 Public private partnership in vascular surgery Mendes, Cynthia de Almeida Martins, Alexandre de Arruda Teivelis, Marcelo Passos Kuzniec, Sérgio Wolosker, Nelson Einstein (Sao Paulo) Health Economics and Management OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyze the results of a public-private partnership between the Ministry of Health and a private hospital in a project of assistance and scientific research in the field of endovascular surgery. Methods: The flows, costs and clinical outcomes of patients treated in a the public-private partnership between April 2012 and July 2013 were analyzed. All patients underwent surgery and stayed at least one day at the intensive care unit of the private hospital. They also participated in a research protocol to compare two intravenous contrast media used in endovascular surgery (iodinated contrast and carbon dioxide). RESULTS: A total of 62 endovascular procedures were performed in 57 patients from the public healthcare system. Hospital and endovascular supplies expenses were significantly higher as compared to the amount paid by the Unified Health System (SUS - Sistema Único de Saúde) in two out of three disease groups studied. Among outpatients, the average interval between appointment and surgery was 15 days and, in hospitalized patients 7 days. All procedures were successful with no conversion to open surgery. The new contrast medium studied - carbon dioxide – was effective and cheaper. CONCLUSION: The waiting time for patients between indication and accomplishment of surgery was significantly reduced. Public-private partnerships can speed up care of patients from public health services, and generate and improve scientific knowledge. Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4872947/ /pubmed/25295457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082014GS3029 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Health Economics and Management
Mendes, Cynthia de Almeida
Martins, Alexandre de Arruda
Teivelis, Marcelo Passos
Kuzniec, Sérgio
Wolosker, Nelson
Public private partnership in vascular surgery
title Public private partnership in vascular surgery
title_full Public private partnership in vascular surgery
title_fullStr Public private partnership in vascular surgery
title_full_unstemmed Public private partnership in vascular surgery
title_short Public private partnership in vascular surgery
title_sort public private partnership in vascular surgery
topic Health Economics and Management
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4872947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25295457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-45082014GS3029
work_keys_str_mv AT mendescynthiadealmeida publicprivatepartnershipinvascularsurgery
AT martinsalexandredearruda publicprivatepartnershipinvascularsurgery
AT teivelismarcelopassos publicprivatepartnershipinvascularsurgery
AT kuzniecsergio publicprivatepartnershipinvascularsurgery
AT woloskernelson publicprivatepartnershipinvascularsurgery