Cargando…
IRB perspectives on obligations to disclose genetic incidental findings to research participants
PURPOSE: Researchers’ obligations to disclose genetic incidental findings (GIFs) have been widely debated, but there has been little empirical study of IRBs’ engagement with this issue. METHODS: This article presents data from the first extensive (n=796) national survey of IRB professionals’ underst...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26583685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.149 |
_version_ | 1782432882119147520 |
---|---|
author | Gliwa, Catherine Yurkiewicz, Ilana R. Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani Hull, Sara Chandros Jones, Nathan Berkman, Benjamin E. |
author_facet | Gliwa, Catherine Yurkiewicz, Ilana R. Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani Hull, Sara Chandros Jones, Nathan Berkman, Benjamin E. |
author_sort | Gliwa, Catherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Researchers’ obligations to disclose genetic incidental findings (GIFs) have been widely debated, but there has been little empirical study of IRBs’ engagement with this issue. METHODS: This article presents data from the first extensive (n=796) national survey of IRB professionals’ understanding of, experience with, and beliefs surrounding GIFs. RESULTS: Most respondents had dealt with questions about GIFs (74%), but only a minority (47%) felt prepared to address them. Although a majority believed that there is an obligation to disclose GIFs (78%) there is still not consensus about the supporting ethical principles. Respondents generally did not endorse the idea that researchers’ additional time and effort (7%) and lack of resources (29%) were valid reasons for diminishing a putative obligation. Most (96%) supported a right not to know, but this view became less pronounced (63%) when framed in terms of specific case studies. CONCLUSIONS: IRBs are actively engaged with GIFs, but have not yet reached consensus. Respondents were uncomfortable with arguments that could be used to limit an obligation to return GIFs. This could indicate that IRBs are providing some of the impetus for the trend towards returning GIFs, although questions remain about the relative contribution of other stakeholders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4873456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48734562016-07-08 IRB perspectives on obligations to disclose genetic incidental findings to research participants Gliwa, Catherine Yurkiewicz, Ilana R. Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani Hull, Sara Chandros Jones, Nathan Berkman, Benjamin E. Genet Med Article PURPOSE: Researchers’ obligations to disclose genetic incidental findings (GIFs) have been widely debated, but there has been little empirical study of IRBs’ engagement with this issue. METHODS: This article presents data from the first extensive (n=796) national survey of IRB professionals’ understanding of, experience with, and beliefs surrounding GIFs. RESULTS: Most respondents had dealt with questions about GIFs (74%), but only a minority (47%) felt prepared to address them. Although a majority believed that there is an obligation to disclose GIFs (78%) there is still not consensus about the supporting ethical principles. Respondents generally did not endorse the idea that researchers’ additional time and effort (7%) and lack of resources (29%) were valid reasons for diminishing a putative obligation. Most (96%) supported a right not to know, but this view became less pronounced (63%) when framed in terms of specific case studies. CONCLUSIONS: IRBs are actively engaged with GIFs, but have not yet reached consensus. Respondents were uncomfortable with arguments that could be used to limit an obligation to return GIFs. This could indicate that IRBs are providing some of the impetus for the trend towards returning GIFs, although questions remain about the relative contribution of other stakeholders. 2015-11-19 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4873456/ /pubmed/26583685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.149 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Gliwa, Catherine Yurkiewicz, Ilana R. Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani Hull, Sara Chandros Jones, Nathan Berkman, Benjamin E. IRB perspectives on obligations to disclose genetic incidental findings to research participants |
title | IRB perspectives on obligations to disclose genetic incidental findings to research participants |
title_full | IRB perspectives on obligations to disclose genetic incidental findings to research participants |
title_fullStr | IRB perspectives on obligations to disclose genetic incidental findings to research participants |
title_full_unstemmed | IRB perspectives on obligations to disclose genetic incidental findings to research participants |
title_short | IRB perspectives on obligations to disclose genetic incidental findings to research participants |
title_sort | irb perspectives on obligations to disclose genetic incidental findings to research participants |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26583685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.149 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gliwacatherine irbperspectivesonobligationstodisclosegeneticincidentalfindingstoresearchparticipants AT yurkiewiczilanar irbperspectivesonobligationstodisclosegeneticincidentalfindingstoresearchparticipants AT lehmannlisasoleymani irbperspectivesonobligationstodisclosegeneticincidentalfindingstoresearchparticipants AT hullsarachandros irbperspectivesonobligationstodisclosegeneticincidentalfindingstoresearchparticipants AT jonesnathan irbperspectivesonobligationstodisclosegeneticincidentalfindingstoresearchparticipants AT berkmanbenjamine irbperspectivesonobligationstodisclosegeneticincidentalfindingstoresearchparticipants |