Cargando…

Multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation: an audit of implant quality based on dosimetric evaluation comparing intra-operative versus post-operative placement

PURPOSE: The use of multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in early breast cancer (EBC) patients outside the trial setting has increased. Hence, there is a need to critically evaluate implant quality. Moreover, there is a scarcity of reports...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gurram, Lavanya, Wadasadawala, Tabassum, Joshi, Kishor, Phurailatpam, Reena, Paul, Siji, Sarin, Rajiv
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27257415
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2016.59195
_version_ 1782432898494758912
author Gurram, Lavanya
Wadasadawala, Tabassum
Joshi, Kishor
Phurailatpam, Reena
Paul, Siji
Sarin, Rajiv
author_facet Gurram, Lavanya
Wadasadawala, Tabassum
Joshi, Kishor
Phurailatpam, Reena
Paul, Siji
Sarin, Rajiv
author_sort Gurram, Lavanya
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The use of multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in early breast cancer (EBC) patients outside the trial setting has increased. Hence, there is a need to critically evaluate implant quality. Moreover, there is a scarcity of reports using an open cavity technique. We report the dosimetric indices of open and closed cavity MIB techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The dosimetric parameters of 60 EBC patients treated with MIB (open and closed cavity) who underwent three dimensional, computerized tomography (CT) based planning for APBI from November 2011 to July 2015 were evaluated. Coverage Index (CI), Dose Homogeneity Index (DHI), Conformity Index (COIN), Plan Quality Index (PQI), and Dose Non-uniformity Index (DNR) were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-one patients underwent open cavity and 19 patients underwent closed cavity placement of brachytherapy catheters. The median number of planes was 4 and median number of needles was 20. Median dose was 34 Gy with dose per fraction of 3.4 Gy, given twice a day, 6 hours apart. The D(90) of the cavity and clinical target volume (CTV) were 105% and 89%, respectively. The median doses to the surgical clips were greater than 100%. The median CI of the cavity and CTV was 0.96 and 0.82, respectively. The DHI and COIN index of the CTV was 0.73 and 0.67. There were no significant differences in the dosimetric parameters based on whether the technique was done open or closed. CONCLUSIONS: Critical evaluation of the dosimetric parameters of MIB-APBI is important for optimal results. While the open and closed techniques have similar dosimetry, our institutional preference is for an open technique which eases the procedure due to direct visualization of the tumor cavity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4873549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48735492016-06-02 Multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation: an audit of implant quality based on dosimetric evaluation comparing intra-operative versus post-operative placement Gurram, Lavanya Wadasadawala, Tabassum Joshi, Kishor Phurailatpam, Reena Paul, Siji Sarin, Rajiv J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: The use of multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in early breast cancer (EBC) patients outside the trial setting has increased. Hence, there is a need to critically evaluate implant quality. Moreover, there is a scarcity of reports using an open cavity technique. We report the dosimetric indices of open and closed cavity MIB techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The dosimetric parameters of 60 EBC patients treated with MIB (open and closed cavity) who underwent three dimensional, computerized tomography (CT) based planning for APBI from November 2011 to July 2015 were evaluated. Coverage Index (CI), Dose Homogeneity Index (DHI), Conformity Index (COIN), Plan Quality Index (PQI), and Dose Non-uniformity Index (DNR) were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-one patients underwent open cavity and 19 patients underwent closed cavity placement of brachytherapy catheters. The median number of planes was 4 and median number of needles was 20. Median dose was 34 Gy with dose per fraction of 3.4 Gy, given twice a day, 6 hours apart. The D(90) of the cavity and clinical target volume (CTV) were 105% and 89%, respectively. The median doses to the surgical clips were greater than 100%. The median CI of the cavity and CTV was 0.96 and 0.82, respectively. The DHI and COIN index of the CTV was 0.73 and 0.67. There were no significant differences in the dosimetric parameters based on whether the technique was done open or closed. CONCLUSIONS: Critical evaluation of the dosimetric parameters of MIB-APBI is important for optimal results. While the open and closed techniques have similar dosimetry, our institutional preference is for an open technique which eases the procedure due to direct visualization of the tumor cavity. Termedia Publishing House 2016-04-14 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4873549/ /pubmed/27257415 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2016.59195 Text en Copyright © 2016 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Gurram, Lavanya
Wadasadawala, Tabassum
Joshi, Kishor
Phurailatpam, Reena
Paul, Siji
Sarin, Rajiv
Multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation: an audit of implant quality based on dosimetric evaluation comparing intra-operative versus post-operative placement
title Multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation: an audit of implant quality based on dosimetric evaluation comparing intra-operative versus post-operative placement
title_full Multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation: an audit of implant quality based on dosimetric evaluation comparing intra-operative versus post-operative placement
title_fullStr Multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation: an audit of implant quality based on dosimetric evaluation comparing intra-operative versus post-operative placement
title_full_unstemmed Multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation: an audit of implant quality based on dosimetric evaluation comparing intra-operative versus post-operative placement
title_short Multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation: an audit of implant quality based on dosimetric evaluation comparing intra-operative versus post-operative placement
title_sort multi-catheter interstitial brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation: an audit of implant quality based on dosimetric evaluation comparing intra-operative versus post-operative placement
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27257415
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2016.59195
work_keys_str_mv AT gurramlavanya multicatheterinterstitialbrachytherapyforpartialbreastirradiationanauditofimplantqualitybasedondosimetricevaluationcomparingintraoperativeversuspostoperativeplacement
AT wadasadawalatabassum multicatheterinterstitialbrachytherapyforpartialbreastirradiationanauditofimplantqualitybasedondosimetricevaluationcomparingintraoperativeversuspostoperativeplacement
AT joshikishor multicatheterinterstitialbrachytherapyforpartialbreastirradiationanauditofimplantqualitybasedondosimetricevaluationcomparingintraoperativeversuspostoperativeplacement
AT phurailatpamreena multicatheterinterstitialbrachytherapyforpartialbreastirradiationanauditofimplantqualitybasedondosimetricevaluationcomparingintraoperativeversuspostoperativeplacement
AT paulsiji multicatheterinterstitialbrachytherapyforpartialbreastirradiationanauditofimplantqualitybasedondosimetricevaluationcomparingintraoperativeversuspostoperativeplacement
AT sarinrajiv multicatheterinterstitialbrachytherapyforpartialbreastirradiationanauditofimplantqualitybasedondosimetricevaluationcomparingintraoperativeversuspostoperativeplacement