Cargando…
Survey on gynecological cancer treatment by Piedmont, Liguria, and Valle d'Aosta group of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology)
PURPOSE: We focused the attention on radiation therapy practices about the gynecological malignancies in Piedmont, Liguria, and Valle d'Aosta to know the current treatment practice and to improve the quality of care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We proposed a cognitive survey to evaluate the standard...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27257417 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2016.59286 |
_version_ | 1782432899217227776 |
---|---|
author | Cattari, Gabriella Delmastro, Elena Bresciani, Sara Gribaudo, Sergio Melano, Antonella Giannelli, Flavio Tessa, Maria Chiarlone, Renato Scolaro, Tindaro Krengli, Marco Urgesi, Alessandro Gabriele, Pietro |
author_facet | Cattari, Gabriella Delmastro, Elena Bresciani, Sara Gribaudo, Sergio Melano, Antonella Giannelli, Flavio Tessa, Maria Chiarlone, Renato Scolaro, Tindaro Krengli, Marco Urgesi, Alessandro Gabriele, Pietro |
author_sort | Cattari, Gabriella |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: We focused the attention on radiation therapy practices about the gynecological malignancies in Piedmont, Liguria, and Valle d'Aosta to know the current treatment practice and to improve the quality of care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We proposed a cognitive survey to evaluate the standard practice patterns for gynecological cancer management, adopted from 2012 to 2014 by radiotherapy (RT) centers with a large amount of gynecological cancer cases. There were three topics: 1. Taking care and multidisciplinary approach, 2. Radiotherapy treatment and brachytherapy, 3. Follow-up. RESULTS: Nineteen centers treated gynecological malignancies and 12 of these had a multidisciplinary dedicated team. Radiotherapy option has been used in all clinical setting: definitive, adjuvant, and palliative. In general, 1978 patients were treated. There were 834 brachytherapy (BRT) treatments. The fusion between diagnostic imaging (magnetic resonance imaging – MRI, positron emission tomography – PET) and computed tomography (CT) simulation was used for contouring in all centers. Conformal RT and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were the most frequent techniques. The image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) was used in 10/19 centers. There were 8 active BRT centers. Brachytherapy was performed both with radical intent and as boost, mostly by HDR (6/8 centers). The doses for exclusive BRT were between 20 to 30 Gy. The doses for BRT boost were between 10 and 20 Gy. Four centers used CT-MRI compatible applicators but only one used MRI for planning. The BRT plans on vaginal cuff were still performed on traditional radiographies in 2 centers. The plan sum was evaluated in only 1 center. Only 1 center performed in vivo dosimetry. CONCLUSIONS: In the last three years, multidisciplinary approach, contouring, treatment techniques, doses, and control systems were similar in Liguria-Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta. However, the technology implementation didn't translate in a real treatment innovation so far. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4873552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48735522016-06-02 Survey on gynecological cancer treatment by Piedmont, Liguria, and Valle d'Aosta group of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) Cattari, Gabriella Delmastro, Elena Bresciani, Sara Gribaudo, Sergio Melano, Antonella Giannelli, Flavio Tessa, Maria Chiarlone, Renato Scolaro, Tindaro Krengli, Marco Urgesi, Alessandro Gabriele, Pietro J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: We focused the attention on radiation therapy practices about the gynecological malignancies in Piedmont, Liguria, and Valle d'Aosta to know the current treatment practice and to improve the quality of care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We proposed a cognitive survey to evaluate the standard practice patterns for gynecological cancer management, adopted from 2012 to 2014 by radiotherapy (RT) centers with a large amount of gynecological cancer cases. There were three topics: 1. Taking care and multidisciplinary approach, 2. Radiotherapy treatment and brachytherapy, 3. Follow-up. RESULTS: Nineteen centers treated gynecological malignancies and 12 of these had a multidisciplinary dedicated team. Radiotherapy option has been used in all clinical setting: definitive, adjuvant, and palliative. In general, 1978 patients were treated. There were 834 brachytherapy (BRT) treatments. The fusion between diagnostic imaging (magnetic resonance imaging – MRI, positron emission tomography – PET) and computed tomography (CT) simulation was used for contouring in all centers. Conformal RT and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were the most frequent techniques. The image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) was used in 10/19 centers. There were 8 active BRT centers. Brachytherapy was performed both with radical intent and as boost, mostly by HDR (6/8 centers). The doses for exclusive BRT were between 20 to 30 Gy. The doses for BRT boost were between 10 and 20 Gy. Four centers used CT-MRI compatible applicators but only one used MRI for planning. The BRT plans on vaginal cuff were still performed on traditional radiographies in 2 centers. The plan sum was evaluated in only 1 center. Only 1 center performed in vivo dosimetry. CONCLUSIONS: In the last three years, multidisciplinary approach, contouring, treatment techniques, doses, and control systems were similar in Liguria-Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta. However, the technology implementation didn't translate in a real treatment innovation so far. Termedia Publishing House 2016-04-14 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4873552/ /pubmed/27257417 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2016.59286 Text en Copyright © 2016 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Cattari, Gabriella Delmastro, Elena Bresciani, Sara Gribaudo, Sergio Melano, Antonella Giannelli, Flavio Tessa, Maria Chiarlone, Renato Scolaro, Tindaro Krengli, Marco Urgesi, Alessandro Gabriele, Pietro Survey on gynecological cancer treatment by Piedmont, Liguria, and Valle d'Aosta group of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) |
title | Survey on gynecological cancer treatment by Piedmont, Liguria, and Valle d'Aosta group of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) |
title_full | Survey on gynecological cancer treatment by Piedmont, Liguria, and Valle d'Aosta group of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) |
title_fullStr | Survey on gynecological cancer treatment by Piedmont, Liguria, and Valle d'Aosta group of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) |
title_full_unstemmed | Survey on gynecological cancer treatment by Piedmont, Liguria, and Valle d'Aosta group of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) |
title_short | Survey on gynecological cancer treatment by Piedmont, Liguria, and Valle d'Aosta group of AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology) |
title_sort | survey on gynecological cancer treatment by piedmont, liguria, and valle d'aosta group of airo (italian association of radiation oncology) |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27257417 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2016.59286 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cattarigabriella surveyongynecologicalcancertreatmentbypiedmontliguriaandvalledaostagroupofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncology AT delmastroelena surveyongynecologicalcancertreatmentbypiedmontliguriaandvalledaostagroupofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncology AT brescianisara surveyongynecologicalcancertreatmentbypiedmontliguriaandvalledaostagroupofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncology AT gribaudosergio surveyongynecologicalcancertreatmentbypiedmontliguriaandvalledaostagroupofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncology AT melanoantonella surveyongynecologicalcancertreatmentbypiedmontliguriaandvalledaostagroupofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncology AT giannelliflavio surveyongynecologicalcancertreatmentbypiedmontliguriaandvalledaostagroupofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncology AT tessamaria surveyongynecologicalcancertreatmentbypiedmontliguriaandvalledaostagroupofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncology AT chiarlonerenato surveyongynecologicalcancertreatmentbypiedmontliguriaandvalledaostagroupofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncology AT scolarotindaro surveyongynecologicalcancertreatmentbypiedmontliguriaandvalledaostagroupofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncology AT krenglimarco surveyongynecologicalcancertreatmentbypiedmontliguriaandvalledaostagroupofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncology AT urgesialessandro surveyongynecologicalcancertreatmentbypiedmontliguriaandvalledaostagroupofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncology AT gabrielepietro surveyongynecologicalcancertreatmentbypiedmontliguriaandvalledaostagroupofairoitalianassociationofradiationoncology |