Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012

BACKGROUND: The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommends semi-annual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening using ultrasound (US) in persons with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection at high risk for HCC such as Asian males aged ≥40 years and Asian females aged...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gounder, Prabhu P., Bulkow, Lisa R., Meltzer, Martin I., Bruce, Michael G., Hennessy, Thomas W., Snowball, Mary, Spradling, Philip R., Adhikari, Bishwa B., McMahon, Brian J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27197711
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v75.31115
_version_ 1782432901096275968
author Gounder, Prabhu P.
Bulkow, Lisa R.
Meltzer, Martin I.
Bruce, Michael G.
Hennessy, Thomas W.
Snowball, Mary
Spradling, Philip R.
Adhikari, Bishwa B.
McMahon, Brian J.
author_facet Gounder, Prabhu P.
Bulkow, Lisa R.
Meltzer, Martin I.
Bruce, Michael G.
Hennessy, Thomas W.
Snowball, Mary
Spradling, Philip R.
Adhikari, Bishwa B.
McMahon, Brian J.
author_sort Gounder, Prabhu P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommends semi-annual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening using ultrasound (US) in persons with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection at high risk for HCC such as Asian males aged ≥40 years and Asian females aged ≥50 years. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the cost-effectiveness of 2 HCC screening methods in the Alaska Native (AN) health system: US-alone, or screening by alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) initially and switching to US for subsequent screenings if AFP >10 ng/mL (AFP→US). DESIGN: A spreadsheet-based model was developed for accounting the costs of 2 hypothetical HCC screening methods. We used epidemiologic data from a cohort of 839 AN persons with CHB who were offered HCC screening by AFP/US semi-annually during 1983–2012. We assumed that compared with AFP→US, US-alone identifies 33% more tumours at an early stage (defined as a single tumour ≤5 cm or ≤3 tumours ≤3 cm in diameter). Years of life gained (YLG) attributed to screening was estimated by comparing additional years of survival among persons with early- compared with late-stage tumours. Screening costs were calculated using Medicare reimbursement rates in 2012. Future screening costs and YLG were projected over a 30-year time horizon using a 3% discount rate. RESULTS: The total cost of screening for the cohort by AFP→US would have been approximately $357,000 ($36,000/early-stage tumour detected) compared to $814,000 ($59,000/early-stage tumour detected) by US-alone. The AFP→US method would have yielded an additional 27.8 YLG ($13,000/YLG) compared with 38.9 YLG ($21,000/YLG) for US-alone. Screening by US-alone would incur an additional $114,000 per extra early-tumour detected compared with AFP→US and $41,000 per extra YLG. CONCLUSIONS: Although US-alone HCC screening might have yielded more YLG than AFP→US, the reduced costs of the AFP→US method could expand access to HCC screening in resource constrained settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4873562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48735622016-06-08 Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012 Gounder, Prabhu P. Bulkow, Lisa R. Meltzer, Martin I. Bruce, Michael G. Hennessy, Thomas W. Snowball, Mary Spradling, Philip R. Adhikari, Bishwa B. McMahon, Brian J. Int J Circumpolar Health Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommends semi-annual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening using ultrasound (US) in persons with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection at high risk for HCC such as Asian males aged ≥40 years and Asian females aged ≥50 years. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the cost-effectiveness of 2 HCC screening methods in the Alaska Native (AN) health system: US-alone, or screening by alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) initially and switching to US for subsequent screenings if AFP >10 ng/mL (AFP→US). DESIGN: A spreadsheet-based model was developed for accounting the costs of 2 hypothetical HCC screening methods. We used epidemiologic data from a cohort of 839 AN persons with CHB who were offered HCC screening by AFP/US semi-annually during 1983–2012. We assumed that compared with AFP→US, US-alone identifies 33% more tumours at an early stage (defined as a single tumour ≤5 cm or ≤3 tumours ≤3 cm in diameter). Years of life gained (YLG) attributed to screening was estimated by comparing additional years of survival among persons with early- compared with late-stage tumours. Screening costs were calculated using Medicare reimbursement rates in 2012. Future screening costs and YLG were projected over a 30-year time horizon using a 3% discount rate. RESULTS: The total cost of screening for the cohort by AFP→US would have been approximately $357,000 ($36,000/early-stage tumour detected) compared to $814,000 ($59,000/early-stage tumour detected) by US-alone. The AFP→US method would have yielded an additional 27.8 YLG ($13,000/YLG) compared with 38.9 YLG ($21,000/YLG) for US-alone. Screening by US-alone would incur an additional $114,000 per extra early-tumour detected compared with AFP→US and $41,000 per extra YLG. CONCLUSIONS: Although US-alone HCC screening might have yielded more YLG than AFP→US, the reduced costs of the AFP→US method could expand access to HCC screening in resource constrained settings. Co-Action Publishing 2016-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4873562/ /pubmed/27197711 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v75.31115 Text en © 2016 Prabhu P. Gounder et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Gounder, Prabhu P.
Bulkow, Lisa R.
Meltzer, Martin I.
Bruce, Michael G.
Hennessy, Thomas W.
Snowball, Mary
Spradling, Philip R.
Adhikari, Bishwa B.
McMahon, Brian J.
Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among alaska native people, 1983–2012
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27197711
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v75.31115
work_keys_str_mv AT gounderprabhup costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012
AT bulkowlisar costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012
AT meltzermartini costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012
AT brucemichaelg costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012
AT hennessythomasw costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012
AT snowballmary costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012
AT spradlingphilipr costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012
AT adhikaribishwab costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012
AT mcmahonbrianj costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012