Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012
BACKGROUND: The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommends semi-annual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening using ultrasound (US) in persons with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection at high risk for HCC such as Asian males aged ≥40 years and Asian females aged...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Co-Action Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27197711 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v75.31115 |
_version_ | 1782432901096275968 |
---|---|
author | Gounder, Prabhu P. Bulkow, Lisa R. Meltzer, Martin I. Bruce, Michael G. Hennessy, Thomas W. Snowball, Mary Spradling, Philip R. Adhikari, Bishwa B. McMahon, Brian J. |
author_facet | Gounder, Prabhu P. Bulkow, Lisa R. Meltzer, Martin I. Bruce, Michael G. Hennessy, Thomas W. Snowball, Mary Spradling, Philip R. Adhikari, Bishwa B. McMahon, Brian J. |
author_sort | Gounder, Prabhu P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommends semi-annual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening using ultrasound (US) in persons with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection at high risk for HCC such as Asian males aged ≥40 years and Asian females aged ≥50 years. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the cost-effectiveness of 2 HCC screening methods in the Alaska Native (AN) health system: US-alone, or screening by alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) initially and switching to US for subsequent screenings if AFP >10 ng/mL (AFP→US). DESIGN: A spreadsheet-based model was developed for accounting the costs of 2 hypothetical HCC screening methods. We used epidemiologic data from a cohort of 839 AN persons with CHB who were offered HCC screening by AFP/US semi-annually during 1983–2012. We assumed that compared with AFP→US, US-alone identifies 33% more tumours at an early stage (defined as a single tumour ≤5 cm or ≤3 tumours ≤3 cm in diameter). Years of life gained (YLG) attributed to screening was estimated by comparing additional years of survival among persons with early- compared with late-stage tumours. Screening costs were calculated using Medicare reimbursement rates in 2012. Future screening costs and YLG were projected over a 30-year time horizon using a 3% discount rate. RESULTS: The total cost of screening for the cohort by AFP→US would have been approximately $357,000 ($36,000/early-stage tumour detected) compared to $814,000 ($59,000/early-stage tumour detected) by US-alone. The AFP→US method would have yielded an additional 27.8 YLG ($13,000/YLG) compared with 38.9 YLG ($21,000/YLG) for US-alone. Screening by US-alone would incur an additional $114,000 per extra early-tumour detected compared with AFP→US and $41,000 per extra YLG. CONCLUSIONS: Although US-alone HCC screening might have yielded more YLG than AFP→US, the reduced costs of the AFP→US method could expand access to HCC screening in resource constrained settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4873562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Co-Action Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48735622016-06-08 Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012 Gounder, Prabhu P. Bulkow, Lisa R. Meltzer, Martin I. Bruce, Michael G. Hennessy, Thomas W. Snowball, Mary Spradling, Philip R. Adhikari, Bishwa B. McMahon, Brian J. Int J Circumpolar Health Original Research Article BACKGROUND: The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommends semi-annual hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening using ultrasound (US) in persons with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) virus infection at high risk for HCC such as Asian males aged ≥40 years and Asian females aged ≥50 years. OBJECTIVE: To analyse the cost-effectiveness of 2 HCC screening methods in the Alaska Native (AN) health system: US-alone, or screening by alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) initially and switching to US for subsequent screenings if AFP >10 ng/mL (AFP→US). DESIGN: A spreadsheet-based model was developed for accounting the costs of 2 hypothetical HCC screening methods. We used epidemiologic data from a cohort of 839 AN persons with CHB who were offered HCC screening by AFP/US semi-annually during 1983–2012. We assumed that compared with AFP→US, US-alone identifies 33% more tumours at an early stage (defined as a single tumour ≤5 cm or ≤3 tumours ≤3 cm in diameter). Years of life gained (YLG) attributed to screening was estimated by comparing additional years of survival among persons with early- compared with late-stage tumours. Screening costs were calculated using Medicare reimbursement rates in 2012. Future screening costs and YLG were projected over a 30-year time horizon using a 3% discount rate. RESULTS: The total cost of screening for the cohort by AFP→US would have been approximately $357,000 ($36,000/early-stage tumour detected) compared to $814,000 ($59,000/early-stage tumour detected) by US-alone. The AFP→US method would have yielded an additional 27.8 YLG ($13,000/YLG) compared with 38.9 YLG ($21,000/YLG) for US-alone. Screening by US-alone would incur an additional $114,000 per extra early-tumour detected compared with AFP→US and $41,000 per extra YLG. CONCLUSIONS: Although US-alone HCC screening might have yielded more YLG than AFP→US, the reduced costs of the AFP→US method could expand access to HCC screening in resource constrained settings. Co-Action Publishing 2016-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4873562/ /pubmed/27197711 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v75.31115 Text en © 2016 Prabhu P. Gounder et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Gounder, Prabhu P. Bulkow, Lisa R. Meltzer, Martin I. Bruce, Michael G. Hennessy, Thomas W. Snowball, Mary Spradling, Philip R. Adhikari, Bishwa B. McMahon, Brian J. Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012 |
title | Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012 |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012 |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012 |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012 |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among Alaska Native people, 1983–2012 |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by combinations of ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein among alaska native people, 1983–2012 |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27197711 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v75.31115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gounderprabhup costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012 AT bulkowlisar costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012 AT meltzermartini costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012 AT brucemichaelg costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012 AT hennessythomasw costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012 AT snowballmary costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012 AT spradlingphilipr costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012 AT adhikaribishwab costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012 AT mcmahonbrianj costeffectivenessanalysisofhepatocellularcarcinomascreeningbycombinationsofultrasoundandalphafetoproteinamongalaskanativepeople19832012 |