Letter to the Editor: A reply – acknowledged reasonable limitations in a secondary analysis but key conclusions remain in ‘The neural basis of flashback formation: the impact of viewing trauma’

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clark, I. A., MacKay, C. E., Holmes, E. A., Bourne, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2016
Materias:
Correspondence
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873935/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716000052
_version_ 1782432969759129600
author Clark, I. A.
MacKay, C. E.
Holmes, E. A.
Bourne, C.
author_facet Clark, I. A.
MacKay, C. E.
Holmes, E. A.
Bourne, C.
author_sort Clark, I. A.
collection PubMed
description
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4873935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48739352016-05-27 Letter to the Editor: A reply – acknowledged reasonable limitations in a secondary analysis but key conclusions remain in ‘The neural basis of flashback formation: the impact of viewing trauma’ Clark, I. A. MacKay, C. E. Holmes, E. A. Bourne, C. Psychol Med Correspondence Cambridge University Press 2016-06 2016-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4873935/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716000052 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Clark, I. A.
MacKay, C. E.
Holmes, E. A.
Bourne, C.
Letter to the Editor: A reply – acknowledged reasonable limitations in a secondary analysis but key conclusions remain in ‘The neural basis of flashback formation: the impact of viewing trauma’
title Letter to the Editor: A reply – acknowledged reasonable limitations in a secondary analysis but key conclusions remain in ‘The neural basis of flashback formation: the impact of viewing trauma’
title_full Letter to the Editor: A reply – acknowledged reasonable limitations in a secondary analysis but key conclusions remain in ‘The neural basis of flashback formation: the impact of viewing trauma’
title_fullStr Letter to the Editor: A reply – acknowledged reasonable limitations in a secondary analysis but key conclusions remain in ‘The neural basis of flashback formation: the impact of viewing trauma’
title_full_unstemmed Letter to the Editor: A reply – acknowledged reasonable limitations in a secondary analysis but key conclusions remain in ‘The neural basis of flashback formation: the impact of viewing trauma’
title_short Letter to the Editor: A reply – acknowledged reasonable limitations in a secondary analysis but key conclusions remain in ‘The neural basis of flashback formation: the impact of viewing trauma’
title_sort letter to the editor: a reply – acknowledged reasonable limitations in a secondary analysis but key conclusions remain in ‘the neural basis of flashback formation: the impact of viewing trauma’
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873935/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716000052
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkia lettertotheeditorareplyacknowledgedreasonablelimitationsinasecondaryanalysisbutkeyconclusionsremainintheneuralbasisofflashbackformationtheimpactofviewingtrauma
AT mackayce lettertotheeditorareplyacknowledgedreasonablelimitationsinasecondaryanalysisbutkeyconclusionsremainintheneuralbasisofflashbackformationtheimpactofviewingtrauma
AT holmesea lettertotheeditorareplyacknowledgedreasonablelimitationsinasecondaryanalysisbutkeyconclusionsremainintheneuralbasisofflashbackformationtheimpactofviewingtrauma
AT bournec lettertotheeditorareplyacknowledgedreasonablelimitationsinasecondaryanalysisbutkeyconclusionsremainintheneuralbasisofflashbackformationtheimpactofviewingtrauma

Ejemplares similares