Cargando…
Meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users
Ecstasy/3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) use is proposed to cause damage to serotonergic (5-HT) axons in humans. Therefore, users should show deficits in cognitive processes that rely on serotonin-rich, prefrontal areas of the brain. However, there is inconsistency in findings to support thi...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26966023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716000258 |
_version_ | 1782432970226794496 |
---|---|
author | Roberts, C. A. Jones, A. Montgomery, C. |
author_facet | Roberts, C. A. Jones, A. Montgomery, C. |
author_sort | Roberts, C. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ecstasy/3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) use is proposed to cause damage to serotonergic (5-HT) axons in humans. Therefore, users should show deficits in cognitive processes that rely on serotonin-rich, prefrontal areas of the brain. However, there is inconsistency in findings to support this hypothesis. The aim of the current study was to examine deficits in executive functioning in ecstasy users compared with controls using meta-analysis. We identified k = 39 studies, contributing 89 effect sizes, investigating executive functioning in ecstasy users and polydrug-using controls. We compared function-specific task performance in 1221 current ecstasy users and 1242 drug-using controls, from tasks tapping the executive functions – updating, switching, inhibition and access to long-term memory. The significant main effect demonstrated overall executive dysfunction in ecstasy users [standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.26 to −0.11, Z = 5.05, p < 0.001, I(2) = 82%], with a significant subgroup effect (χ(2) = 22.06, degrees of freedom = 3, p < 0.001, I(2) = 86.4%) demonstrating differential effects across executive functions. Ecstasy users showed significant performance deficits in access (SMD = −0.33, 95% CI −0.46 to −0.19, Z = 4.72, p < 0.001, I(2) = 74%), switching (SMD = −0.19, 95% CI −0.36 to −0.02, Z = 2.16, p < 0.05, I(2) = 85%) and updating (SMD = −0.26, 95% CI −0.37 to −0.15, Z = 4.49, p < 0.001, I(2) = 82%). No differences were observed in inhibitory control. We conclude that this is the most comprehensive analysis of executive function in ecstasy users to date and provides a behavioural correlate of potential serotonergic neurotoxicity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4873937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48739372016-05-27 Meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users Roberts, C. A. Jones, A. Montgomery, C. Psychol Med Review Article Ecstasy/3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) use is proposed to cause damage to serotonergic (5-HT) axons in humans. Therefore, users should show deficits in cognitive processes that rely on serotonin-rich, prefrontal areas of the brain. However, there is inconsistency in findings to support this hypothesis. The aim of the current study was to examine deficits in executive functioning in ecstasy users compared with controls using meta-analysis. We identified k = 39 studies, contributing 89 effect sizes, investigating executive functioning in ecstasy users and polydrug-using controls. We compared function-specific task performance in 1221 current ecstasy users and 1242 drug-using controls, from tasks tapping the executive functions – updating, switching, inhibition and access to long-term memory. The significant main effect demonstrated overall executive dysfunction in ecstasy users [standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.26 to −0.11, Z = 5.05, p < 0.001, I(2) = 82%], with a significant subgroup effect (χ(2) = 22.06, degrees of freedom = 3, p < 0.001, I(2) = 86.4%) demonstrating differential effects across executive functions. Ecstasy users showed significant performance deficits in access (SMD = −0.33, 95% CI −0.46 to −0.19, Z = 4.72, p < 0.001, I(2) = 74%), switching (SMD = −0.19, 95% CI −0.36 to −0.02, Z = 2.16, p < 0.05, I(2) = 85%) and updating (SMD = −0.26, 95% CI −0.37 to −0.15, Z = 4.49, p < 0.001, I(2) = 82%). No differences were observed in inhibitory control. We conclude that this is the most comprehensive analysis of executive function in ecstasy users to date and provides a behavioural correlate of potential serotonergic neurotoxicity. Cambridge University Press 2016-06 2016-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4873937/ /pubmed/26966023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716000258 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Roberts, C. A. Jones, A. Montgomery, C. Meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users |
title | Meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users |
title_full | Meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users |
title_fullStr | Meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users |
title_short | Meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users |
title_sort | meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26966023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716000258 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertsca metaanalysisofexecutivefunctioninginecstasypolydrugusers AT jonesa metaanalysisofexecutivefunctioninginecstasypolydrugusers AT montgomeryc metaanalysisofexecutivefunctioninginecstasypolydrugusers |