Cargando…

Meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users

Ecstasy/3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) use is proposed to cause damage to serotonergic (5-HT) axons in humans. Therefore, users should show deficits in cognitive processes that rely on serotonin-rich, prefrontal areas of the brain. However, there is inconsistency in findings to support thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, C. A., Jones, A., Montgomery, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26966023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716000258
_version_ 1782432970226794496
author Roberts, C. A.
Jones, A.
Montgomery, C.
author_facet Roberts, C. A.
Jones, A.
Montgomery, C.
author_sort Roberts, C. A.
collection PubMed
description Ecstasy/3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) use is proposed to cause damage to serotonergic (5-HT) axons in humans. Therefore, users should show deficits in cognitive processes that rely on serotonin-rich, prefrontal areas of the brain. However, there is inconsistency in findings to support this hypothesis. The aim of the current study was to examine deficits in executive functioning in ecstasy users compared with controls using meta-analysis. We identified k = 39 studies, contributing 89 effect sizes, investigating executive functioning in ecstasy users and polydrug-using controls. We compared function-specific task performance in 1221 current ecstasy users and 1242 drug-using controls, from tasks tapping the executive functions – updating, switching, inhibition and access to long-term memory. The significant main effect demonstrated overall executive dysfunction in ecstasy users [standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.26 to −0.11, Z = 5.05, p < 0.001, I(2) = 82%], with a significant subgroup effect (χ(2) = 22.06, degrees of freedom = 3, p < 0.001, I(2) = 86.4%) demonstrating differential effects across executive functions. Ecstasy users showed significant performance deficits in access (SMD = −0.33, 95% CI −0.46 to −0.19, Z = 4.72, p < 0.001, I(2) = 74%), switching (SMD = −0.19, 95% CI −0.36 to −0.02, Z = 2.16, p < 0.05, I(2) = 85%) and updating (SMD = −0.26, 95% CI −0.37 to −0.15, Z = 4.49, p < 0.001, I(2) = 82%). No differences were observed in inhibitory control. We conclude that this is the most comprehensive analysis of executive function in ecstasy users to date and provides a behavioural correlate of potential serotonergic neurotoxicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4873937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48739372016-05-27 Meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users Roberts, C. A. Jones, A. Montgomery, C. Psychol Med Review Article Ecstasy/3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) use is proposed to cause damage to serotonergic (5-HT) axons in humans. Therefore, users should show deficits in cognitive processes that rely on serotonin-rich, prefrontal areas of the brain. However, there is inconsistency in findings to support this hypothesis. The aim of the current study was to examine deficits in executive functioning in ecstasy users compared with controls using meta-analysis. We identified k = 39 studies, contributing 89 effect sizes, investigating executive functioning in ecstasy users and polydrug-using controls. We compared function-specific task performance in 1221 current ecstasy users and 1242 drug-using controls, from tasks tapping the executive functions – updating, switching, inhibition and access to long-term memory. The significant main effect demonstrated overall executive dysfunction in ecstasy users [standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.26 to −0.11, Z = 5.05, p < 0.001, I(2) = 82%], with a significant subgroup effect (χ(2) = 22.06, degrees of freedom = 3, p < 0.001, I(2) = 86.4%) demonstrating differential effects across executive functions. Ecstasy users showed significant performance deficits in access (SMD = −0.33, 95% CI −0.46 to −0.19, Z = 4.72, p < 0.001, I(2) = 74%), switching (SMD = −0.19, 95% CI −0.36 to −0.02, Z = 2.16, p < 0.05, I(2) = 85%) and updating (SMD = −0.26, 95% CI −0.37 to −0.15, Z = 4.49, p < 0.001, I(2) = 82%). No differences were observed in inhibitory control. We conclude that this is the most comprehensive analysis of executive function in ecstasy users to date and provides a behavioural correlate of potential serotonergic neurotoxicity. Cambridge University Press 2016-06 2016-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4873937/ /pubmed/26966023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716000258 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Roberts, C. A.
Jones, A.
Montgomery, C.
Meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users
title Meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users
title_full Meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users
title_short Meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users
title_sort meta-analysis of executive functioning in ecstasy/polydrug users
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4873937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26966023
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716000258
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsca metaanalysisofexecutivefunctioninginecstasypolydrugusers
AT jonesa metaanalysisofexecutivefunctioninginecstasypolydrugusers
AT montgomeryc metaanalysisofexecutivefunctioninginecstasypolydrugusers