Cargando…

Osteoblastic lesion screening with an advanced post-processing package enabling in-plane rib reading in CT-images

BACKGROUND: To evaluate screening and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of osteoblastic rib lesions using an advanced post-processing package enabling in-plane rib reading in CT-images. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the CT-data of 60 consecutive prostate cancer patients by applying dedica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seuss, Hannes, Dankerl, Peter, Cavallaro, Alexander, Uder, Michael, Hammon, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27198576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-016-0141-0
_version_ 1782432983069753344
author Seuss, Hannes
Dankerl, Peter
Cavallaro, Alexander
Uder, Michael
Hammon, Matthias
author_facet Seuss, Hannes
Dankerl, Peter
Cavallaro, Alexander
Uder, Michael
Hammon, Matthias
author_sort Seuss, Hannes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate screening and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of osteoblastic rib lesions using an advanced post-processing package enabling in-plane rib reading in CT-images. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the CT-data of 60 consecutive prostate cancer patients by applying dedicated software enabling in-plane rib reading. Reading the conventional multiplanar reconstructions was considered to be the reference standard. To simulate clinical practice, the reader was given 10 s to screen for sclerotic rib lesions in each patient applying both approaches. Afterwards, every rib was evaluated individually with both approaches without a time limit. Sensitivities, specificities, positive/negative predictive values and the time needed for detection were calculated depending on the lesion’s size (largest diameter < 5 mm, 5–10 mm, > 10 mm). RESULTS: In 53 of 60 patients, all ribs were properly displayed in plane, in five patients ribs were partially displayed correctly, and in two patients none of the ribs were displayed correctly. During the 10-s screening approach all patients with sclerotic rib lesions were correctly identified reading the in-plane images (including the patients without a correct rib segmentation), whereas 14 of 23 patients were correctly identified reading conventional multiplanar images. Overall screening sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values were 100/27.0/46.0/100 %, respectively, for in-plane reading and 60.9/100/100/80.4 %, respectively, for multiplanar reading. Overall diagnostic (no time limit) sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values of in-plane reading were 97.8/92.8/74.6/99.5 %, respectively. False positive results predominantly occurred for lesions <5 mm in size. CONCLUSIONS: In-plane reading of the ribs allows reliable detection of osteoblastic lesions for screening purposes. The limited specificity results from false positives predominantly occurring for small lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4874002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48740022016-05-21 Osteoblastic lesion screening with an advanced post-processing package enabling in-plane rib reading in CT-images Seuss, Hannes Dankerl, Peter Cavallaro, Alexander Uder, Michael Hammon, Matthias BMC Med Imaging Research Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate screening and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of osteoblastic rib lesions using an advanced post-processing package enabling in-plane rib reading in CT-images. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the CT-data of 60 consecutive prostate cancer patients by applying dedicated software enabling in-plane rib reading. Reading the conventional multiplanar reconstructions was considered to be the reference standard. To simulate clinical practice, the reader was given 10 s to screen for sclerotic rib lesions in each patient applying both approaches. Afterwards, every rib was evaluated individually with both approaches without a time limit. Sensitivities, specificities, positive/negative predictive values and the time needed for detection were calculated depending on the lesion’s size (largest diameter < 5 mm, 5–10 mm, > 10 mm). RESULTS: In 53 of 60 patients, all ribs were properly displayed in plane, in five patients ribs were partially displayed correctly, and in two patients none of the ribs were displayed correctly. During the 10-s screening approach all patients with sclerotic rib lesions were correctly identified reading the in-plane images (including the patients without a correct rib segmentation), whereas 14 of 23 patients were correctly identified reading conventional multiplanar images. Overall screening sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values were 100/27.0/46.0/100 %, respectively, for in-plane reading and 60.9/100/100/80.4 %, respectively, for multiplanar reading. Overall diagnostic (no time limit) sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values of in-plane reading were 97.8/92.8/74.6/99.5 %, respectively. False positive results predominantly occurred for lesions <5 mm in size. CONCLUSIONS: In-plane reading of the ribs allows reliable detection of osteoblastic lesions for screening purposes. The limited specificity results from false positives predominantly occurring for small lesions. BioMed Central 2016-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4874002/ /pubmed/27198576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-016-0141-0 Text en © Seuss et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Seuss, Hannes
Dankerl, Peter
Cavallaro, Alexander
Uder, Michael
Hammon, Matthias
Osteoblastic lesion screening with an advanced post-processing package enabling in-plane rib reading in CT-images
title Osteoblastic lesion screening with an advanced post-processing package enabling in-plane rib reading in CT-images
title_full Osteoblastic lesion screening with an advanced post-processing package enabling in-plane rib reading in CT-images
title_fullStr Osteoblastic lesion screening with an advanced post-processing package enabling in-plane rib reading in CT-images
title_full_unstemmed Osteoblastic lesion screening with an advanced post-processing package enabling in-plane rib reading in CT-images
title_short Osteoblastic lesion screening with an advanced post-processing package enabling in-plane rib reading in CT-images
title_sort osteoblastic lesion screening with an advanced post-processing package enabling in-plane rib reading in ct-images
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27198576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12880-016-0141-0
work_keys_str_mv AT seusshannes osteoblasticlesionscreeningwithanadvancedpostprocessingpackageenablinginplaneribreadinginctimages
AT dankerlpeter osteoblasticlesionscreeningwithanadvancedpostprocessingpackageenablinginplaneribreadinginctimages
AT cavallaroalexander osteoblasticlesionscreeningwithanadvancedpostprocessingpackageenablinginplaneribreadinginctimages
AT udermichael osteoblasticlesionscreeningwithanadvancedpostprocessingpackageenablinginplaneribreadinginctimages
AT hammonmatthias osteoblasticlesionscreeningwithanadvancedpostprocessingpackageenablinginplaneribreadinginctimages