Cargando…

Statewide retrospective study of low acuity emergency presentations in New South Wales, Australia: who, what, where and why?

OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to use a statewide population-based registry to assess the prevalence of low acuity emergency department (ED) presentations, describe the trend in presentation rates and to determine whether they were associated with various presentation characteristics such as the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dinh, Michael M, Berendsen Russell, Saartje, Bein, Kendall J, Chalkley, Dane R, Muscatello, David, Paoloni, Richard, Ivers, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27165649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010964
_version_ 1782433005126549504
author Dinh, Michael M
Berendsen Russell, Saartje
Bein, Kendall J
Chalkley, Dane R
Muscatello, David
Paoloni, Richard
Ivers, Rebecca
author_facet Dinh, Michael M
Berendsen Russell, Saartje
Bein, Kendall J
Chalkley, Dane R
Muscatello, David
Paoloni, Richard
Ivers, Rebecca
author_sort Dinh, Michael M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to use a statewide population-based registry to assess the prevalence of low acuity emergency department (ED) presentations, describe the trend in presentation rates and to determine whether they were associated with various presentation characteristics such as the type of hospital as well as clinical and demographic variables. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a retrospective analysis of a population-based registry of ED presentations in New South Wales (NSW). Generalised estimating equations with log links were used to determine factors associated with low acuity presentations to account for repeat presentations and the possibility of clustering of outcomes. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were included in this analysis if they presented to an ED between January 2010 and December 2014. The outcomes of interest were low acuity presentation, defined as those who self-presented (were not transported by ambulance), were assigned a triage category of 4 or 5 (semiurgent or non-urgent) and discharged back to usual residence from ED. RESULTS: There were 10.7 million ED presentations analysed. Of these, 45% were classified as a low acuity presentation. There was no discernible increase in the rate of low acuity presentations across NSW between 2010 and 2014. The strongest predictors of low acuity ED presentation were age <40 years of age (OR 1.77); injury or musculoskeletal administrative and non-urgent procedures (OR 2.96); ear, nose and throat, eye or oral (OR 5.53); skin or allergy-type presenting problems (OR 2.84). CONCLUSIONS: Low acuity ED presentations comprise almost half of all ED presentations. Alternative emergency models of care may help meet the needs of these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4874101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48741012016-05-27 Statewide retrospective study of low acuity emergency presentations in New South Wales, Australia: who, what, where and why? Dinh, Michael M Berendsen Russell, Saartje Bein, Kendall J Chalkley, Dane R Muscatello, David Paoloni, Richard Ivers, Rebecca BMJ Open Emergency Medicine OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to use a statewide population-based registry to assess the prevalence of low acuity emergency department (ED) presentations, describe the trend in presentation rates and to determine whether they were associated with various presentation characteristics such as the type of hospital as well as clinical and demographic variables. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a retrospective analysis of a population-based registry of ED presentations in New South Wales (NSW). Generalised estimating equations with log links were used to determine factors associated with low acuity presentations to account for repeat presentations and the possibility of clustering of outcomes. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were included in this analysis if they presented to an ED between January 2010 and December 2014. The outcomes of interest were low acuity presentation, defined as those who self-presented (were not transported by ambulance), were assigned a triage category of 4 or 5 (semiurgent or non-urgent) and discharged back to usual residence from ED. RESULTS: There were 10.7 million ED presentations analysed. Of these, 45% were classified as a low acuity presentation. There was no discernible increase in the rate of low acuity presentations across NSW between 2010 and 2014. The strongest predictors of low acuity ED presentation were age <40 years of age (OR 1.77); injury or musculoskeletal administrative and non-urgent procedures (OR 2.96); ear, nose and throat, eye or oral (OR 5.53); skin or allergy-type presenting problems (OR 2.84). CONCLUSIONS: Low acuity ED presentations comprise almost half of all ED presentations. Alternative emergency models of care may help meet the needs of these patients. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4874101/ /pubmed/27165649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010964 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Emergency Medicine
Dinh, Michael M
Berendsen Russell, Saartje
Bein, Kendall J
Chalkley, Dane R
Muscatello, David
Paoloni, Richard
Ivers, Rebecca
Statewide retrospective study of low acuity emergency presentations in New South Wales, Australia: who, what, where and why?
title Statewide retrospective study of low acuity emergency presentations in New South Wales, Australia: who, what, where and why?
title_full Statewide retrospective study of low acuity emergency presentations in New South Wales, Australia: who, what, where and why?
title_fullStr Statewide retrospective study of low acuity emergency presentations in New South Wales, Australia: who, what, where and why?
title_full_unstemmed Statewide retrospective study of low acuity emergency presentations in New South Wales, Australia: who, what, where and why?
title_short Statewide retrospective study of low acuity emergency presentations in New South Wales, Australia: who, what, where and why?
title_sort statewide retrospective study of low acuity emergency presentations in new south wales, australia: who, what, where and why?
topic Emergency Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27165649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010964
work_keys_str_mv AT dinhmichaelm statewideretrospectivestudyoflowacuityemergencypresentationsinnewsouthwalesaustraliawhowhatwhereandwhy
AT berendsenrussellsaartje statewideretrospectivestudyoflowacuityemergencypresentationsinnewsouthwalesaustraliawhowhatwhereandwhy
AT beinkendallj statewideretrospectivestudyoflowacuityemergencypresentationsinnewsouthwalesaustraliawhowhatwhereandwhy
AT chalkleydaner statewideretrospectivestudyoflowacuityemergencypresentationsinnewsouthwalesaustraliawhowhatwhereandwhy
AT muscatellodavid statewideretrospectivestudyoflowacuityemergencypresentationsinnewsouthwalesaustraliawhowhatwhereandwhy
AT paolonirichard statewideretrospectivestudyoflowacuityemergencypresentationsinnewsouthwalesaustraliawhowhatwhereandwhy
AT iversrebecca statewideretrospectivestudyoflowacuityemergencypresentationsinnewsouthwalesaustraliawhowhatwhereandwhy