Cargando…
Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Many resources are required to provide postoperative care to patients who receive a cochlear implant. The implant service commits to lifetime follow-up. The patient commits to regular adjustment and rehabilitation appointments in the first year and annual follow-up appointments thereaf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27178980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011342 |
_version_ | 1782433009386913792 |
---|---|
author | Cullington, Helen Kitterick, Padraig DeBold, Lisa Weal, Mark Clarke, Nicholas Newberry, Eva Aubert, Lisa |
author_facet | Cullington, Helen Kitterick, Padraig DeBold, Lisa Weal, Mark Clarke, Nicholas Newberry, Eva Aubert, Lisa |
author_sort | Cullington, Helen |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Many resources are required to provide postoperative care to patients who receive a cochlear implant. The implant service commits to lifetime follow-up. The patient commits to regular adjustment and rehabilitation appointments in the first year and annual follow-up appointments thereafter. Offering remote follow-up may result in more stable hearing, reduced patient travel expense, time and disruption, more empowered patients, greater equality in service delivery and more freedom to optimise the allocation of clinic resources. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a two-arm feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving 60 adults using cochlear implants with at least 6 months device experience in a 6-month clinical trial of remote care. This project will design, implement and evaluate a person-centred long-term follow-up pathway for people using cochlear implants offering a triple approach of remote and self-monitoring, self-adjustment of device and a personalised online support tool for home speech recognition testing, information, self-rehabilitation, advice, equipment training and troubleshooting. The main outcome measure is patient activation. Secondary outcomes are stability and quality of hearing, stability of quality of life, clinic resources, patient and clinician experience, and any adverse events associated with remote care. We will examine the acceptability of remote care to service users and clinicians, the willingness of participants to be randomised, and attrition rates. We will estimate numbers required to plan a fully powered RCT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was received from North West—Greater Manchester South Research Ethics Committee (15/NW/0860) and the University of Southampton Research Governance Office (ERGO 15329). RESULTS: Results will be disseminated in the clinical and scientific communities and also to the patient population via peer-reviewed research publications both online and in print, conference and meeting presentations, posters, newsletter articles, website reports and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14644286; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4874122 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48741222016-05-27 Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial Cullington, Helen Kitterick, Padraig DeBold, Lisa Weal, Mark Clarke, Nicholas Newberry, Eva Aubert, Lisa BMJ Open Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology INTRODUCTION: Many resources are required to provide postoperative care to patients who receive a cochlear implant. The implant service commits to lifetime follow-up. The patient commits to regular adjustment and rehabilitation appointments in the first year and annual follow-up appointments thereafter. Offering remote follow-up may result in more stable hearing, reduced patient travel expense, time and disruption, more empowered patients, greater equality in service delivery and more freedom to optimise the allocation of clinic resources. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a two-arm feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving 60 adults using cochlear implants with at least 6 months device experience in a 6-month clinical trial of remote care. This project will design, implement and evaluate a person-centred long-term follow-up pathway for people using cochlear implants offering a triple approach of remote and self-monitoring, self-adjustment of device and a personalised online support tool for home speech recognition testing, information, self-rehabilitation, advice, equipment training and troubleshooting. The main outcome measure is patient activation. Secondary outcomes are stability and quality of hearing, stability of quality of life, clinic resources, patient and clinician experience, and any adverse events associated with remote care. We will examine the acceptability of remote care to service users and clinicians, the willingness of participants to be randomised, and attrition rates. We will estimate numbers required to plan a fully powered RCT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was received from North West—Greater Manchester South Research Ethics Committee (15/NW/0860) and the University of Southampton Research Governance Office (ERGO 15329). RESULTS: Results will be disseminated in the clinical and scientific communities and also to the patient population via peer-reviewed research publications both online and in print, conference and meeting presentations, posters, newsletter articles, website reports and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14644286; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4874122/ /pubmed/27178980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011342 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology Cullington, Helen Kitterick, Padraig DeBold, Lisa Weal, Mark Clarke, Nicholas Newberry, Eva Aubert, Lisa Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title | Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial |
topic | Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874122/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27178980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011342 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cullingtonhelen personalisedlongtermfollowupofcochlearimplantpatientsusingremotecarecomparedwiththoseonthestandardcarepathwaystudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kitterickpadraig personalisedlongtermfollowupofcochlearimplantpatientsusingremotecarecomparedwiththoseonthestandardcarepathwaystudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT deboldlisa personalisedlongtermfollowupofcochlearimplantpatientsusingremotecarecomparedwiththoseonthestandardcarepathwaystudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wealmark personalisedlongtermfollowupofcochlearimplantpatientsusingremotecarecomparedwiththoseonthestandardcarepathwaystudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT clarkenicholas personalisedlongtermfollowupofcochlearimplantpatientsusingremotecarecomparedwiththoseonthestandardcarepathwaystudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT newberryeva personalisedlongtermfollowupofcochlearimplantpatientsusingremotecarecomparedwiththoseonthestandardcarepathwaystudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT aubertlisa personalisedlongtermfollowupofcochlearimplantpatientsusingremotecarecomparedwiththoseonthestandardcarepathwaystudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial |