Cargando…

Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Many resources are required to provide postoperative care to patients who receive a cochlear implant. The implant service commits to lifetime follow-up. The patient commits to regular adjustment and rehabilitation appointments in the first year and annual follow-up appointments thereaf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cullington, Helen, Kitterick, Padraig, DeBold, Lisa, Weal, Mark, Clarke, Nicholas, Newberry, Eva, Aubert, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27178980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011342
_version_ 1782433009386913792
author Cullington, Helen
Kitterick, Padraig
DeBold, Lisa
Weal, Mark
Clarke, Nicholas
Newberry, Eva
Aubert, Lisa
author_facet Cullington, Helen
Kitterick, Padraig
DeBold, Lisa
Weal, Mark
Clarke, Nicholas
Newberry, Eva
Aubert, Lisa
author_sort Cullington, Helen
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Many resources are required to provide postoperative care to patients who receive a cochlear implant. The implant service commits to lifetime follow-up. The patient commits to regular adjustment and rehabilitation appointments in the first year and annual follow-up appointments thereafter. Offering remote follow-up may result in more stable hearing, reduced patient travel expense, time and disruption, more empowered patients, greater equality in service delivery and more freedom to optimise the allocation of clinic resources. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a two-arm feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving 60 adults using cochlear implants with at least 6 months device experience in a 6-month clinical trial of remote care. This project will design, implement and evaluate a person-centred long-term follow-up pathway for people using cochlear implants offering a triple approach of remote and self-monitoring, self-adjustment of device and a personalised online support tool for home speech recognition testing, information, self-rehabilitation, advice, equipment training and troubleshooting. The main outcome measure is patient activation. Secondary outcomes are stability and quality of hearing, stability of quality of life, clinic resources, patient and clinician experience, and any adverse events associated with remote care. We will examine the acceptability of remote care to service users and clinicians, the willingness of participants to be randomised, and attrition rates. We will estimate numbers required to plan a fully powered RCT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was received from North West—Greater Manchester South Research Ethics Committee (15/NW/0860) and the University of Southampton Research Governance Office (ERGO 15329). RESULTS: Results will be disseminated in the clinical and scientific communities and also to the patient population via peer-reviewed research publications both online and in print, conference and meeting presentations, posters, newsletter articles, website reports and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14644286; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4874122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48741222016-05-27 Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial Cullington, Helen Kitterick, Padraig DeBold, Lisa Weal, Mark Clarke, Nicholas Newberry, Eva Aubert, Lisa BMJ Open Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology INTRODUCTION: Many resources are required to provide postoperative care to patients who receive a cochlear implant. The implant service commits to lifetime follow-up. The patient commits to regular adjustment and rehabilitation appointments in the first year and annual follow-up appointments thereafter. Offering remote follow-up may result in more stable hearing, reduced patient travel expense, time and disruption, more empowered patients, greater equality in service delivery and more freedom to optimise the allocation of clinic resources. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This will be a two-arm feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving 60 adults using cochlear implants with at least 6 months device experience in a 6-month clinical trial of remote care. This project will design, implement and evaluate a person-centred long-term follow-up pathway for people using cochlear implants offering a triple approach of remote and self-monitoring, self-adjustment of device and a personalised online support tool for home speech recognition testing, information, self-rehabilitation, advice, equipment training and troubleshooting. The main outcome measure is patient activation. Secondary outcomes are stability and quality of hearing, stability of quality of life, clinic resources, patient and clinician experience, and any adverse events associated with remote care. We will examine the acceptability of remote care to service users and clinicians, the willingness of participants to be randomised, and attrition rates. We will estimate numbers required to plan a fully powered RCT. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was received from North West—Greater Manchester South Research Ethics Committee (15/NW/0860) and the University of Southampton Research Governance Office (ERGO 15329). RESULTS: Results will be disseminated in the clinical and scientific communities and also to the patient population via peer-reviewed research publications both online and in print, conference and meeting presentations, posters, newsletter articles, website reports and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14644286; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4874122/ /pubmed/27178980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011342 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology
Cullington, Helen
Kitterick, Padraig
DeBold, Lisa
Weal, Mark
Clarke, Nicholas
Newberry, Eva
Aubert, Lisa
Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_full Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_short Personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
title_sort personalised long-term follow-up of cochlear implant patients using remote care, compared with those on the standard care pathway: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
topic Ear, Nose and Throat/Otolaryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27178980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011342
work_keys_str_mv AT cullingtonhelen personalisedlongtermfollowupofcochlearimplantpatientsusingremotecarecomparedwiththoseonthestandardcarepathwaystudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kitterickpadraig personalisedlongtermfollowupofcochlearimplantpatientsusingremotecarecomparedwiththoseonthestandardcarepathwaystudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT deboldlisa personalisedlongtermfollowupofcochlearimplantpatientsusingremotecarecomparedwiththoseonthestandardcarepathwaystudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wealmark personalisedlongtermfollowupofcochlearimplantpatientsusingremotecarecomparedwiththoseonthestandardcarepathwaystudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT clarkenicholas personalisedlongtermfollowupofcochlearimplantpatientsusingremotecarecomparedwiththoseonthestandardcarepathwaystudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT newberryeva personalisedlongtermfollowupofcochlearimplantpatientsusingremotecarecomparedwiththoseonthestandardcarepathwaystudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT aubertlisa personalisedlongtermfollowupofcochlearimplantpatientsusingremotecarecomparedwiththoseonthestandardcarepathwaystudyprotocolforafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial