Cargando…

Association of BMI and interpregnancy BMI change with birth outcomes in an Australian obstetric population: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To assess maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with increasing body mass index (BMI) and interpregnancy BMI changes in an Australian obstetric population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study from 2008 to 2013 was undertaken. BMI for 14 875 women was categorised as follows: underwei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knight-Agarwal, Catherine R, Williams, Lauren T, Davis, Deborah, Davey, Rachel, Cochrane, Tom, Zhang, Huanhua, Rickwood, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27165646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010667
_version_ 1782433010606407680
author Knight-Agarwal, Catherine R
Williams, Lauren T
Davis, Deborah
Davey, Rachel
Cochrane, Tom
Zhang, Huanhua
Rickwood, Peter
author_facet Knight-Agarwal, Catherine R
Williams, Lauren T
Davis, Deborah
Davey, Rachel
Cochrane, Tom
Zhang, Huanhua
Rickwood, Peter
author_sort Knight-Agarwal, Catherine R
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with increasing body mass index (BMI) and interpregnancy BMI changes in an Australian obstetric population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study from 2008 to 2013 was undertaken. BMI for 14 875 women was categorised as follows: underweight (≤18 kg/m(2)); normal weight (19–24 kg/m(2)); overweight (25–29 kg/m(2)); obese class I (30–34 kg/m(2)); obese class II (35–39 kg/m(2)) and obese class III (40+ kg/m(2)). BMI categories and maternal, neonatal and birthing outcomes were examined using logistic regression. Interpregnancy change in BMI and the risk of adverse outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy were also examined. RESULTS: Within this cohort, 751 (5.1%) women were underweight, 7431 (50.0%) had normal BMI, 3748 (25.1%) were overweight, 1598 (10.8%) were obese class I, 737 (5.0%) were obese class II and 592 (4.0%) were obese class III. In bivariate adjusted models, obese women were at an increased risk of caesarean section, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and neonatal morbidities including macrosomia, large for gestational age (LGA), hypoglycaemia, low 5 min Apgar score and respiratory distress. Multiparous women who experienced an interpregnancy increase of ≥3 BMI units had a higher adjusted OR (AOR) (CI) of the following adverse outcomes in their subsequent pregnancy: low 5-min Apgar score 3.242 (1.557 to 7.118); gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) 3.258 (1.129 to 10.665) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy 3.922 (1.243 to 14.760). These women were more likely to give birth vaginally 2.030 (1.417 to 2.913). Conversely, women whose parity changed from 0 to 1 and who experienced an interpregnancy increase of ≥3 BMI units had a higher AOR (CI) of caesarean section in their second pregnancy 1.806 (1.139 to 2.862). CONCLUSIONS: Women who are overweight or obese have a significantly increased risk of various adverse outcomes. Interpregnancy weight gain, regardless of parity and baseline BMI, also increases various adverse outcomes. Effective weight management strategies are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4874127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48741272016-05-27 Association of BMI and interpregnancy BMI change with birth outcomes in an Australian obstetric population: a retrospective cohort study Knight-Agarwal, Catherine R Williams, Lauren T Davis, Deborah Davey, Rachel Cochrane, Tom Zhang, Huanhua Rickwood, Peter BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To assess maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with increasing body mass index (BMI) and interpregnancy BMI changes in an Australian obstetric population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study from 2008 to 2013 was undertaken. BMI for 14 875 women was categorised as follows: underweight (≤18 kg/m(2)); normal weight (19–24 kg/m(2)); overweight (25–29 kg/m(2)); obese class I (30–34 kg/m(2)); obese class II (35–39 kg/m(2)) and obese class III (40+ kg/m(2)). BMI categories and maternal, neonatal and birthing outcomes were examined using logistic regression. Interpregnancy change in BMI and the risk of adverse outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy were also examined. RESULTS: Within this cohort, 751 (5.1%) women were underweight, 7431 (50.0%) had normal BMI, 3748 (25.1%) were overweight, 1598 (10.8%) were obese class I, 737 (5.0%) were obese class II and 592 (4.0%) were obese class III. In bivariate adjusted models, obese women were at an increased risk of caesarean section, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and neonatal morbidities including macrosomia, large for gestational age (LGA), hypoglycaemia, low 5 min Apgar score and respiratory distress. Multiparous women who experienced an interpregnancy increase of ≥3 BMI units had a higher adjusted OR (AOR) (CI) of the following adverse outcomes in their subsequent pregnancy: low 5-min Apgar score 3.242 (1.557 to 7.118); gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) 3.258 (1.129 to 10.665) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy 3.922 (1.243 to 14.760). These women were more likely to give birth vaginally 2.030 (1.417 to 2.913). Conversely, women whose parity changed from 0 to 1 and who experienced an interpregnancy increase of ≥3 BMI units had a higher AOR (CI) of caesarean section in their second pregnancy 1.806 (1.139 to 2.862). CONCLUSIONS: Women who are overweight or obese have a significantly increased risk of various adverse outcomes. Interpregnancy weight gain, regardless of parity and baseline BMI, also increases various adverse outcomes. Effective weight management strategies are needed. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4874127/ /pubmed/27165646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010667 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Knight-Agarwal, Catherine R
Williams, Lauren T
Davis, Deborah
Davey, Rachel
Cochrane, Tom
Zhang, Huanhua
Rickwood, Peter
Association of BMI and interpregnancy BMI change with birth outcomes in an Australian obstetric population: a retrospective cohort study
title Association of BMI and interpregnancy BMI change with birth outcomes in an Australian obstetric population: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Association of BMI and interpregnancy BMI change with birth outcomes in an Australian obstetric population: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Association of BMI and interpregnancy BMI change with birth outcomes in an Australian obstetric population: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Association of BMI and interpregnancy BMI change with birth outcomes in an Australian obstetric population: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Association of BMI and interpregnancy BMI change with birth outcomes in an Australian obstetric population: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort association of bmi and interpregnancy bmi change with birth outcomes in an australian obstetric population: a retrospective cohort study
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27165646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010667
work_keys_str_mv AT knightagarwalcatheriner associationofbmiandinterpregnancybmichangewithbirthoutcomesinanaustralianobstetricpopulationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT williamslaurent associationofbmiandinterpregnancybmichangewithbirthoutcomesinanaustralianobstetricpopulationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT davisdeborah associationofbmiandinterpregnancybmichangewithbirthoutcomesinanaustralianobstetricpopulationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT daveyrachel associationofbmiandinterpregnancybmichangewithbirthoutcomesinanaustralianobstetricpopulationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT cochranetom associationofbmiandinterpregnancybmichangewithbirthoutcomesinanaustralianobstetricpopulationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhanghuanhua associationofbmiandinterpregnancybmichangewithbirthoutcomesinanaustralianobstetricpopulationaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT rickwoodpeter associationofbmiandinterpregnancybmichangewithbirthoutcomesinanaustralianobstetricpopulationaretrospectivecohortstudy