Cargando…
A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol
INTRODUCTION: The variety of organisations providing National Health Service (NHS)-funded services in England is growing. Besides NHS hospitals and general practitioners (GPs), they include corporations, social enterprises, voluntary organisations and others. The degree to which these organisational...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27178975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010680 |
_version_ | 1782433012283080704 |
---|---|
author | Sheaff, Rod Halliday, Joyce Exworthy, Mark Allen, Pauline Mannion, Russell Asthana, Sheena Gibson, Alex Clark, Jonathan |
author_facet | Sheaff, Rod Halliday, Joyce Exworthy, Mark Allen, Pauline Mannion, Russell Asthana, Sheena Gibson, Alex Clark, Jonathan |
author_sort | Sheaff, Rod |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The variety of organisations providing National Health Service (NHS)-funded services in England is growing. Besides NHS hospitals and general practitioners (GPs), they include corporations, social enterprises, voluntary organisations and others. The degree to which these organisational types vary, however, in the ways they manage and provide services and in the outcomes for service quality, patient experience and innovation, remains unclear. This research will help those who commission NHS services select among the different types of organisation for different tasks. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: The main research questions are how organisationally diverse NHS-funded service providers vary in their responsiveness to patient choice, NHS commissioning and policy changes; and their patterns of innovation. We aim to assess the implications for NHS commissioning and managerial practice which follow from these differences. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Systematic qualitative comparison across a purposive sample (c.12) of providers selected for maximum variety of organisational type, with qualitative studies of patient experience and choice (in the same sites). We focus is on NHS services heavily used by older people at high risk of hospital admission: community health services; out-of-hours primary care; and secondary care (planned orthopaedics or ophthalmology). The expected outputs will be evidence-based schemas showing how patterns of service development and delivery typically vary between different organisational types of provider. ETHICS, BENEFITS AND DISSEMINATION: We will ensure informants' organisational and individual anonymity when dealing with high profile case studies and a competitive health economy. The frail elderly is a key demographic sector with significant policy and financial implications. For NHS commissioners, patients, doctors and other stakeholders, the main outcome will be better knowledge about the relative merits of different kinds of healthcare provider. Dissemination will make use of strategies suggested by patient and public involvement, as well as DH and service-specific outlets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4874134 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48741342016-05-27 A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol Sheaff, Rod Halliday, Joyce Exworthy, Mark Allen, Pauline Mannion, Russell Asthana, Sheena Gibson, Alex Clark, Jonathan BMJ Open Health Policy INTRODUCTION: The variety of organisations providing National Health Service (NHS)-funded services in England is growing. Besides NHS hospitals and general practitioners (GPs), they include corporations, social enterprises, voluntary organisations and others. The degree to which these organisational types vary, however, in the ways they manage and provide services and in the outcomes for service quality, patient experience and innovation, remains unclear. This research will help those who commission NHS services select among the different types of organisation for different tasks. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: The main research questions are how organisationally diverse NHS-funded service providers vary in their responsiveness to patient choice, NHS commissioning and policy changes; and their patterns of innovation. We aim to assess the implications for NHS commissioning and managerial practice which follow from these differences. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Systematic qualitative comparison across a purposive sample (c.12) of providers selected for maximum variety of organisational type, with qualitative studies of patient experience and choice (in the same sites). We focus is on NHS services heavily used by older people at high risk of hospital admission: community health services; out-of-hours primary care; and secondary care (planned orthopaedics or ophthalmology). The expected outputs will be evidence-based schemas showing how patterns of service development and delivery typically vary between different organisational types of provider. ETHICS, BENEFITS AND DISSEMINATION: We will ensure informants' organisational and individual anonymity when dealing with high profile case studies and a competitive health economy. The frail elderly is a key demographic sector with significant policy and financial implications. For NHS commissioners, patients, doctors and other stakeholders, the main outcome will be better knowledge about the relative merits of different kinds of healthcare provider. Dissemination will make use of strategies suggested by patient and public involvement, as well as DH and service-specific outlets. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4874134/ /pubmed/27178975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010680 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Health Policy Sheaff, Rod Halliday, Joyce Exworthy, Mark Allen, Pauline Mannion, Russell Asthana, Sheena Gibson, Alex Clark, Jonathan A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol |
title | A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol |
title_full | A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol |
title_fullStr | A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol |
title_short | A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol |
title_sort | qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in england: research protocol |
topic | Health Policy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27178975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010680 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sheaffrod aqualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol AT hallidayjoyce aqualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol AT exworthymark aqualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol AT allenpauline aqualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol AT mannionrussell aqualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol AT asthanasheena aqualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol AT gibsonalex aqualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol AT clarkjonathan aqualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol AT sheaffrod qualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol AT hallidayjoyce qualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol AT exworthymark qualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol AT allenpauline qualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol AT mannionrussell qualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol AT asthanasheena qualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol AT gibsonalex qualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol AT clarkjonathan qualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol |