Cargando…

A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol

INTRODUCTION: The variety of organisations providing National Health Service (NHS)-funded services in England is growing. Besides NHS hospitals and general practitioners (GPs), they include corporations, social enterprises, voluntary organisations and others. The degree to which these organisational...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheaff, Rod, Halliday, Joyce, Exworthy, Mark, Allen, Pauline, Mannion, Russell, Asthana, Sheena, Gibson, Alex, Clark, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27178975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010680
_version_ 1782433012283080704
author Sheaff, Rod
Halliday, Joyce
Exworthy, Mark
Allen, Pauline
Mannion, Russell
Asthana, Sheena
Gibson, Alex
Clark, Jonathan
author_facet Sheaff, Rod
Halliday, Joyce
Exworthy, Mark
Allen, Pauline
Mannion, Russell
Asthana, Sheena
Gibson, Alex
Clark, Jonathan
author_sort Sheaff, Rod
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The variety of organisations providing National Health Service (NHS)-funded services in England is growing. Besides NHS hospitals and general practitioners (GPs), they include corporations, social enterprises, voluntary organisations and others. The degree to which these organisational types vary, however, in the ways they manage and provide services and in the outcomes for service quality, patient experience and innovation, remains unclear. This research will help those who commission NHS services select among the different types of organisation for different tasks. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: The main research questions are how organisationally diverse NHS-funded service providers vary in their responsiveness to patient choice, NHS commissioning and policy changes; and their patterns of innovation. We aim to assess the implications for NHS commissioning and managerial practice which follow from these differences. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Systematic qualitative comparison across a purposive sample (c.12) of providers selected for maximum variety of organisational type, with qualitative studies of patient experience and choice (in the same sites). We focus is on NHS services heavily used by older people at high risk of hospital admission: community health services; out-of-hours primary care; and secondary care (planned orthopaedics or ophthalmology). The expected outputs will be evidence-based schemas showing how patterns of service development and delivery typically vary between different organisational types of provider. ETHICS, BENEFITS AND DISSEMINATION: We will ensure informants' organisational and individual anonymity when dealing with high profile case studies and a competitive health economy. The frail elderly is a key demographic sector with significant policy and financial implications. For NHS commissioners, patients, doctors and other stakeholders, the main outcome will be better knowledge about the relative merits of different kinds of healthcare provider. Dissemination will make use of strategies suggested by patient and public involvement, as well as DH and service-specific outlets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4874134
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48741342016-05-27 A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol Sheaff, Rod Halliday, Joyce Exworthy, Mark Allen, Pauline Mannion, Russell Asthana, Sheena Gibson, Alex Clark, Jonathan BMJ Open Health Policy INTRODUCTION: The variety of organisations providing National Health Service (NHS)-funded services in England is growing. Besides NHS hospitals and general practitioners (GPs), they include corporations, social enterprises, voluntary organisations and others. The degree to which these organisational types vary, however, in the ways they manage and provide services and in the outcomes for service quality, patient experience and innovation, remains unclear. This research will help those who commission NHS services select among the different types of organisation for different tasks. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: The main research questions are how organisationally diverse NHS-funded service providers vary in their responsiveness to patient choice, NHS commissioning and policy changes; and their patterns of innovation. We aim to assess the implications for NHS commissioning and managerial practice which follow from these differences. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Systematic qualitative comparison across a purposive sample (c.12) of providers selected for maximum variety of organisational type, with qualitative studies of patient experience and choice (in the same sites). We focus is on NHS services heavily used by older people at high risk of hospital admission: community health services; out-of-hours primary care; and secondary care (planned orthopaedics or ophthalmology). The expected outputs will be evidence-based schemas showing how patterns of service development and delivery typically vary between different organisational types of provider. ETHICS, BENEFITS AND DISSEMINATION: We will ensure informants' organisational and individual anonymity when dealing with high profile case studies and a competitive health economy. The frail elderly is a key demographic sector with significant policy and financial implications. For NHS commissioners, patients, doctors and other stakeholders, the main outcome will be better knowledge about the relative merits of different kinds of healthcare provider. Dissemination will make use of strategies suggested by patient and public involvement, as well as DH and service-specific outlets. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4874134/ /pubmed/27178975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010680 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Policy
Sheaff, Rod
Halliday, Joyce
Exworthy, Mark
Allen, Pauline
Mannion, Russell
Asthana, Sheena
Gibson, Alex
Clark, Jonathan
A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol
title A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol
title_full A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol
title_fullStr A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol
title_short A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol
title_sort qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in england: research protocol
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27178975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010680
work_keys_str_mv AT sheaffrod aqualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol
AT hallidayjoyce aqualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol
AT exworthymark aqualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol
AT allenpauline aqualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol
AT mannionrussell aqualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol
AT asthanasheena aqualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol
AT gibsonalex aqualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol
AT clarkjonathan aqualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol
AT sheaffrod qualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol
AT hallidayjoyce qualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol
AT exworthymark qualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol
AT allenpauline qualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol
AT mannionrussell qualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol
AT asthanasheena qualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol
AT gibsonalex qualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol
AT clarkjonathan qualitativestudyofdiverseprovidersbehaviourinresponsetocommissionerspatientsandinnovatorsinenglandresearchprotocol