Cargando…
The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Contrast-Enhanced CT in the Diagnosis of Malignant Renal Cystic Lesions: A Meta-Analysis
We compared the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for the diagnosis of renal cystic lesions via a meta-analysis to determine the value of CEUS in the prediction of the malignant potential of complex renal cysts. Eleven studies were evalu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27203086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155857 |
_version_ | 1782433060119117824 |
---|---|
author | Lan, Dong Qu, Hong-Chen Li, Ning Zhu, Xing-Wang Liu, Yi-Li Liu, Chun-Lai |
author_facet | Lan, Dong Qu, Hong-Chen Li, Ning Zhu, Xing-Wang Liu, Yi-Li Liu, Chun-Lai |
author_sort | Lan, Dong |
collection | PubMed |
description | We compared the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for the diagnosis of renal cystic lesions via a meta-analysis to determine the value of CEUS in the prediction of the malignant potential of complex renal cysts. Eleven studies were evaluated: 4 control studies related to CEUS and CECT, 3 studies related to CEUS and 4 studies related to CECT. According to the random effects model, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for CEUS/CECT were 0.95/0.90, 0.79/0.85, 4.39/5.00, and 0.10/0.15, respectively. The areas under the summary receiver operating characteristic (AUCs-SROC) curves for the two methods were 94.24% and 93.39%, and the estimated Q values were 0.8805 and 0.8698, respectively. Comparing the Q index values of CEUS and CECT revealed no significant difference between the two methods (P>0.05). When compared with conventional CECT, CEUS is also useful for diagnosing renal cystic lesions in the clinic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4874594 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48745942016-06-09 The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Contrast-Enhanced CT in the Diagnosis of Malignant Renal Cystic Lesions: A Meta-Analysis Lan, Dong Qu, Hong-Chen Li, Ning Zhu, Xing-Wang Liu, Yi-Li Liu, Chun-Lai PLoS One Research Article We compared the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) for the diagnosis of renal cystic lesions via a meta-analysis to determine the value of CEUS in the prediction of the malignant potential of complex renal cysts. Eleven studies were evaluated: 4 control studies related to CEUS and CECT, 3 studies related to CEUS and 4 studies related to CECT. According to the random effects model, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for CEUS/CECT were 0.95/0.90, 0.79/0.85, 4.39/5.00, and 0.10/0.15, respectively. The areas under the summary receiver operating characteristic (AUCs-SROC) curves for the two methods were 94.24% and 93.39%, and the estimated Q values were 0.8805 and 0.8698, respectively. Comparing the Q index values of CEUS and CECT revealed no significant difference between the two methods (P>0.05). When compared with conventional CECT, CEUS is also useful for diagnosing renal cystic lesions in the clinic. Public Library of Science 2016-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4874594/ /pubmed/27203086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155857 Text en © 2016 Lan et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lan, Dong Qu, Hong-Chen Li, Ning Zhu, Xing-Wang Liu, Yi-Li Liu, Chun-Lai The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Contrast-Enhanced CT in the Diagnosis of Malignant Renal Cystic Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title | The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Contrast-Enhanced CT in the Diagnosis of Malignant Renal Cystic Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Contrast-Enhanced CT in the Diagnosis of Malignant Renal Cystic Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Contrast-Enhanced CT in the Diagnosis of Malignant Renal Cystic Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Contrast-Enhanced CT in the Diagnosis of Malignant Renal Cystic Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Contrast-Enhanced CT in the Diagnosis of Malignant Renal Cystic Lesions: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ct in the diagnosis of malignant renal cystic lesions: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874594/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27203086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155857 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT landong thevalueofcontrastenhancedultrasonographyandcontrastenhancedctinthediagnosisofmalignantrenalcysticlesionsametaanalysis AT quhongchen thevalueofcontrastenhancedultrasonographyandcontrastenhancedctinthediagnosisofmalignantrenalcysticlesionsametaanalysis AT lining thevalueofcontrastenhancedultrasonographyandcontrastenhancedctinthediagnosisofmalignantrenalcysticlesionsametaanalysis AT zhuxingwang thevalueofcontrastenhancedultrasonographyandcontrastenhancedctinthediagnosisofmalignantrenalcysticlesionsametaanalysis AT liuyili thevalueofcontrastenhancedultrasonographyandcontrastenhancedctinthediagnosisofmalignantrenalcysticlesionsametaanalysis AT liuchunlai thevalueofcontrastenhancedultrasonographyandcontrastenhancedctinthediagnosisofmalignantrenalcysticlesionsametaanalysis AT landong valueofcontrastenhancedultrasonographyandcontrastenhancedctinthediagnosisofmalignantrenalcysticlesionsametaanalysis AT quhongchen valueofcontrastenhancedultrasonographyandcontrastenhancedctinthediagnosisofmalignantrenalcysticlesionsametaanalysis AT lining valueofcontrastenhancedultrasonographyandcontrastenhancedctinthediagnosisofmalignantrenalcysticlesionsametaanalysis AT zhuxingwang valueofcontrastenhancedultrasonographyandcontrastenhancedctinthediagnosisofmalignantrenalcysticlesionsametaanalysis AT liuyili valueofcontrastenhancedultrasonographyandcontrastenhancedctinthediagnosisofmalignantrenalcysticlesionsametaanalysis AT liuchunlai valueofcontrastenhancedultrasonographyandcontrastenhancedctinthediagnosisofmalignantrenalcysticlesionsametaanalysis |