Cargando…

A Cost-Effectiveness Tool for Informing Policies on Zika Virus Control

BACKGROUND: As Zika virus continues to spread, decisions regarding resource allocations to control the outbreak underscore the need for a tool to weigh policies according to their cost and the health burden they could avert. For example, to combat the current Zika outbreak the US President requested...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alfaro-Murillo, Jorge A., Parpia, Alyssa S., Fitzpatrick, Meagan C., Tamagnan, Jules A., Medlock, Jan, Ndeffo-Mbah, Martial L., Fish, Durland, Ávila-Agüero, María L., Marín, Rodrigo, Ko, Albert I., Galvani, Alison P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27205899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004743
_version_ 1782433075307741184
author Alfaro-Murillo, Jorge A.
Parpia, Alyssa S.
Fitzpatrick, Meagan C.
Tamagnan, Jules A.
Medlock, Jan
Ndeffo-Mbah, Martial L.
Fish, Durland
Ávila-Agüero, María L.
Marín, Rodrigo
Ko, Albert I.
Galvani, Alison P.
author_facet Alfaro-Murillo, Jorge A.
Parpia, Alyssa S.
Fitzpatrick, Meagan C.
Tamagnan, Jules A.
Medlock, Jan
Ndeffo-Mbah, Martial L.
Fish, Durland
Ávila-Agüero, María L.
Marín, Rodrigo
Ko, Albert I.
Galvani, Alison P.
author_sort Alfaro-Murillo, Jorge A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As Zika virus continues to spread, decisions regarding resource allocations to control the outbreak underscore the need for a tool to weigh policies according to their cost and the health burden they could avert. For example, to combat the current Zika outbreak the US President requested the allocation of $1.8 billion from Congress in February 2016. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Illustrated through an interactive tool, we evaluated how the number of Zika cases averted, the period during pregnancy in which Zika infection poses a risk of microcephaly, and probabilities of microcephaly and Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) impact the cost at which an intervention is cost-effective. From Northeast Brazilian microcephaly incidence data, we estimated the probability of microcephaly in infants born to Zika-infected women (0.49% to 2.10%). We also estimated the probability of GBS arising from Zika infections in Brazil (0.02% to 0.06%) and Colombia (0.08%). We calculated that each microcephaly and GBS case incurs the loss of 29.95 DALYs and 1.25 DALYs per case, as well as direct medical costs for Latin America and the Caribbean of $91,102 and $28,818, respectively. We demonstrated the utility of our cost-effectiveness tool with examples evaluating funding commitments by Costa Rica and Brazil, the US presidential proposal, and the novel approach of genetically modified mosquitoes. Our analyses indicate that the commitments and the proposal are likely to be cost-effective, whereas the cost-effectiveness of genetically modified mosquitoes depends on the country of implementation. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Current estimates from our tool suggest that the health burden from microcephaly and GBS warrants substantial expenditures focused on Zika virus control. Our results justify the funding committed in Costa Rica and Brazil and many aspects of the budget outlined in the US president’s proposal. As data continue to be collected, new parameter estimates can be customized in real-time within our user-friendly tool to provide updated estimates on cost-effectiveness of interventions and inform policy decisions in country-specific settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4874682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48746822016-06-09 A Cost-Effectiveness Tool for Informing Policies on Zika Virus Control Alfaro-Murillo, Jorge A. Parpia, Alyssa S. Fitzpatrick, Meagan C. Tamagnan, Jules A. Medlock, Jan Ndeffo-Mbah, Martial L. Fish, Durland Ávila-Agüero, María L. Marín, Rodrigo Ko, Albert I. Galvani, Alison P. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: As Zika virus continues to spread, decisions regarding resource allocations to control the outbreak underscore the need for a tool to weigh policies according to their cost and the health burden they could avert. For example, to combat the current Zika outbreak the US President requested the allocation of $1.8 billion from Congress in February 2016. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Illustrated through an interactive tool, we evaluated how the number of Zika cases averted, the period during pregnancy in which Zika infection poses a risk of microcephaly, and probabilities of microcephaly and Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) impact the cost at which an intervention is cost-effective. From Northeast Brazilian microcephaly incidence data, we estimated the probability of microcephaly in infants born to Zika-infected women (0.49% to 2.10%). We also estimated the probability of GBS arising from Zika infections in Brazil (0.02% to 0.06%) and Colombia (0.08%). We calculated that each microcephaly and GBS case incurs the loss of 29.95 DALYs and 1.25 DALYs per case, as well as direct medical costs for Latin America and the Caribbean of $91,102 and $28,818, respectively. We demonstrated the utility of our cost-effectiveness tool with examples evaluating funding commitments by Costa Rica and Brazil, the US presidential proposal, and the novel approach of genetically modified mosquitoes. Our analyses indicate that the commitments and the proposal are likely to be cost-effective, whereas the cost-effectiveness of genetically modified mosquitoes depends on the country of implementation. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Current estimates from our tool suggest that the health burden from microcephaly and GBS warrants substantial expenditures focused on Zika virus control. Our results justify the funding committed in Costa Rica and Brazil and many aspects of the budget outlined in the US president’s proposal. As data continue to be collected, new parameter estimates can be customized in real-time within our user-friendly tool to provide updated estimates on cost-effectiveness of interventions and inform policy decisions in country-specific settings. Public Library of Science 2016-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4874682/ /pubmed/27205899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004743 Text en © 2016 Alfaro-Murillo et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Alfaro-Murillo, Jorge A.
Parpia, Alyssa S.
Fitzpatrick, Meagan C.
Tamagnan, Jules A.
Medlock, Jan
Ndeffo-Mbah, Martial L.
Fish, Durland
Ávila-Agüero, María L.
Marín, Rodrigo
Ko, Albert I.
Galvani, Alison P.
A Cost-Effectiveness Tool for Informing Policies on Zika Virus Control
title A Cost-Effectiveness Tool for Informing Policies on Zika Virus Control
title_full A Cost-Effectiveness Tool for Informing Policies on Zika Virus Control
title_fullStr A Cost-Effectiveness Tool for Informing Policies on Zika Virus Control
title_full_unstemmed A Cost-Effectiveness Tool for Informing Policies on Zika Virus Control
title_short A Cost-Effectiveness Tool for Informing Policies on Zika Virus Control
title_sort cost-effectiveness tool for informing policies on zika virus control
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4874682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27205899
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004743
work_keys_str_mv AT alfaromurillojorgea acosteffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT parpiaalyssas acosteffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT fitzpatrickmeaganc acosteffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT tamagnanjulesa acosteffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT medlockjan acosteffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT ndeffombahmartiall acosteffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT fishdurland acosteffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT avilaagueromarial acosteffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT marinrodrigo acosteffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT koalberti acosteffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT galvanialisonp acosteffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT alfaromurillojorgea costeffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT parpiaalyssas costeffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT fitzpatrickmeaganc costeffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT tamagnanjulesa costeffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT medlockjan costeffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT ndeffombahmartiall costeffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT fishdurland costeffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT avilaagueromarial costeffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT marinrodrigo costeffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT koalberti costeffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol
AT galvanialisonp costeffectivenesstoolforinformingpoliciesonzikaviruscontrol