Cargando…

The comparisons of phenotype and genotype between CADASIL and CADASIL-like patients and population-specific evaluation of CADASIL scale in China

BACKGROUND: Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is the most common form of hereditary stroke disorder caused by mutations in the NOTCH3 gene. Although CADASIL scale is a widely used tool to screen clinically suspected CADASIL patients,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Dan, Chen, Daiqi, Li, Xuefei, Hu, Zheng, Yu, Zhiyuan, Wang, Wei, luo, Xiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4875019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27206574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-016-0646-5
_version_ 1782433094103465984
author He, Dan
Chen, Daiqi
Li, Xuefei
Hu, Zheng
Yu, Zhiyuan
Wang, Wei
luo, Xiang
author_facet He, Dan
Chen, Daiqi
Li, Xuefei
Hu, Zheng
Yu, Zhiyuan
Wang, Wei
luo, Xiang
author_sort He, Dan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is the most common form of hereditary stroke disorder caused by mutations in the NOTCH3 gene. Although CADASIL scale is a widely used tool to screen clinically suspected CADASIL patients, the differential effects of this scale in various populations remain unknown. METHODS: 92 CADASIL-like patients and 24 CADASIL patients were selected based on CADASIL scale and gene tests. The clinical, genetic and radiological characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: Based on the CADASIL scale, we first screened 116 suspected CADASIL patients, and detected 20 mutations in 24 CADASIL-patients (Specificity: 20.69 %). Surprisingly, we found that transient ischemic attack/stroke, migraine, cognitive decline, psychiatric disturbances and early onset age in CADASIL scale showed no differences between the CADASIL and the CADASIL-like patients (p > 0.05). Instead, recurrent cerebral ischemic events (58.33 %, p = 0.028) and positive family histories (p < 0.05) were more frequently observed in CADASIL patients. Moreover, compared with CADASIL-like patients (21.74 %), CADASIL patients demonstrated higher percentage of temporal pole involvements (58.33 %, p = 0.001), but not the external capsule involvements (66.67 %, p = 0.602), in MRI imaging. Further, we found that vascular risk factors could occur in both CADASIL patients and CADASIL-like patients, and therefore could not be used as the markers to differentiate the two groups in our study (p > 0.05). By performing DSA analysis, we for the first time identified dysplasia of cerebral blood vessels in CADASIL patients, which were detected more frequently in CADASIL patients (41.67 %) in comparison with CADASIL-like patients (8.69 %, p <0.01). CONCLUSION: Our data suggested that the efficacy of CADASIL scale to diagnose the disease varied with specific populations. Recurrent cerebral ischemic events, temporal pole involvements (but not the external capsule) in MRI imaging and dysplasia of cerebral blood vessels in DSA may be the new potential risk factors of the CADASIL scale suitable for Chinese patients. Gene testing by encephalopathy gene panel is expected to improve the accuracy of CADASIL differential diagnosis and increase the understanding of this disease in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4875019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48750192016-06-21 The comparisons of phenotype and genotype between CADASIL and CADASIL-like patients and population-specific evaluation of CADASIL scale in China He, Dan Chen, Daiqi Li, Xuefei Hu, Zheng Yu, Zhiyuan Wang, Wei luo, Xiang J Headache Pain Research Article BACKGROUND: Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is the most common form of hereditary stroke disorder caused by mutations in the NOTCH3 gene. Although CADASIL scale is a widely used tool to screen clinically suspected CADASIL patients, the differential effects of this scale in various populations remain unknown. METHODS: 92 CADASIL-like patients and 24 CADASIL patients were selected based on CADASIL scale and gene tests. The clinical, genetic and radiological characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: Based on the CADASIL scale, we first screened 116 suspected CADASIL patients, and detected 20 mutations in 24 CADASIL-patients (Specificity: 20.69 %). Surprisingly, we found that transient ischemic attack/stroke, migraine, cognitive decline, psychiatric disturbances and early onset age in CADASIL scale showed no differences between the CADASIL and the CADASIL-like patients (p > 0.05). Instead, recurrent cerebral ischemic events (58.33 %, p = 0.028) and positive family histories (p < 0.05) were more frequently observed in CADASIL patients. Moreover, compared with CADASIL-like patients (21.74 %), CADASIL patients demonstrated higher percentage of temporal pole involvements (58.33 %, p = 0.001), but not the external capsule involvements (66.67 %, p = 0.602), in MRI imaging. Further, we found that vascular risk factors could occur in both CADASIL patients and CADASIL-like patients, and therefore could not be used as the markers to differentiate the two groups in our study (p > 0.05). By performing DSA analysis, we for the first time identified dysplasia of cerebral blood vessels in CADASIL patients, which were detected more frequently in CADASIL patients (41.67 %) in comparison with CADASIL-like patients (8.69 %, p <0.01). CONCLUSION: Our data suggested that the efficacy of CADASIL scale to diagnose the disease varied with specific populations. Recurrent cerebral ischemic events, temporal pole involvements (but not the external capsule) in MRI imaging and dysplasia of cerebral blood vessels in DSA may be the new potential risk factors of the CADASIL scale suitable for Chinese patients. Gene testing by encephalopathy gene panel is expected to improve the accuracy of CADASIL differential diagnosis and increase the understanding of this disease in the future. Springer Milan 2016-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4875019/ /pubmed/27206574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-016-0646-5 Text en © He et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research Article
He, Dan
Chen, Daiqi
Li, Xuefei
Hu, Zheng
Yu, Zhiyuan
Wang, Wei
luo, Xiang
The comparisons of phenotype and genotype between CADASIL and CADASIL-like patients and population-specific evaluation of CADASIL scale in China
title The comparisons of phenotype and genotype between CADASIL and CADASIL-like patients and population-specific evaluation of CADASIL scale in China
title_full The comparisons of phenotype and genotype between CADASIL and CADASIL-like patients and population-specific evaluation of CADASIL scale in China
title_fullStr The comparisons of phenotype and genotype between CADASIL and CADASIL-like patients and population-specific evaluation of CADASIL scale in China
title_full_unstemmed The comparisons of phenotype and genotype between CADASIL and CADASIL-like patients and population-specific evaluation of CADASIL scale in China
title_short The comparisons of phenotype and genotype between CADASIL and CADASIL-like patients and population-specific evaluation of CADASIL scale in China
title_sort comparisons of phenotype and genotype between cadasil and cadasil-like patients and population-specific evaluation of cadasil scale in china
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4875019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27206574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-016-0646-5
work_keys_str_mv AT hedan thecomparisonsofphenotypeandgenotypebetweencadasilandcadasillikepatientsandpopulationspecificevaluationofcadasilscaleinchina
AT chendaiqi thecomparisonsofphenotypeandgenotypebetweencadasilandcadasillikepatientsandpopulationspecificevaluationofcadasilscaleinchina
AT lixuefei thecomparisonsofphenotypeandgenotypebetweencadasilandcadasillikepatientsandpopulationspecificevaluationofcadasilscaleinchina
AT huzheng thecomparisonsofphenotypeandgenotypebetweencadasilandcadasillikepatientsandpopulationspecificevaluationofcadasilscaleinchina
AT yuzhiyuan thecomparisonsofphenotypeandgenotypebetweencadasilandcadasillikepatientsandpopulationspecificevaluationofcadasilscaleinchina
AT wangwei thecomparisonsofphenotypeandgenotypebetweencadasilandcadasillikepatientsandpopulationspecificevaluationofcadasilscaleinchina
AT luoxiang thecomparisonsofphenotypeandgenotypebetweencadasilandcadasillikepatientsandpopulationspecificevaluationofcadasilscaleinchina
AT hedan comparisonsofphenotypeandgenotypebetweencadasilandcadasillikepatientsandpopulationspecificevaluationofcadasilscaleinchina
AT chendaiqi comparisonsofphenotypeandgenotypebetweencadasilandcadasillikepatientsandpopulationspecificevaluationofcadasilscaleinchina
AT lixuefei comparisonsofphenotypeandgenotypebetweencadasilandcadasillikepatientsandpopulationspecificevaluationofcadasilscaleinchina
AT huzheng comparisonsofphenotypeandgenotypebetweencadasilandcadasillikepatientsandpopulationspecificevaluationofcadasilscaleinchina
AT yuzhiyuan comparisonsofphenotypeandgenotypebetweencadasilandcadasillikepatientsandpopulationspecificevaluationofcadasilscaleinchina
AT wangwei comparisonsofphenotypeandgenotypebetweencadasilandcadasillikepatientsandpopulationspecificevaluationofcadasilscaleinchina
AT luoxiang comparisonsofphenotypeandgenotypebetweencadasilandcadasillikepatientsandpopulationspecificevaluationofcadasilscaleinchina