Cargando…

Psychiatry in the age of neuroscience: the impact on clinical practice and lives of patients

Due to the progress being made in the neurosciences, higher expectations for the use of medication, even against the patient’s will, are arising in mental hospitals. In this article, we will discuss whether the neurosciences and new psychopharmacological solutions really support patients who suffer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Landeweer, Elleke, Abma, Tineke, Santegoeds, Jolijn, Widdershoven, Guy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4875058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27340391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10202-008-0057-z
_version_ 1782433098385850368
author Landeweer, Elleke
Abma, Tineke
Santegoeds, Jolijn
Widdershoven, Guy
author_facet Landeweer, Elleke
Abma, Tineke
Santegoeds, Jolijn
Widdershoven, Guy
author_sort Landeweer, Elleke
collection PubMed
description Due to the progress being made in the neurosciences, higher expectations for the use of medication, even against the patient’s will, are arising in mental hospitals. In this article, we will discuss whether the neurosciences and new psychopharmacological solutions really support patients who suffer from mental illnesses. To answer this question, we will focus on the perspective of patients and their experiences with psychiatric (coercive) treatments. The analysis of one person’s story shows that other issues besides appropriate medication are important for recovery from a mental illness. In daily life, issues such as coping, rehabilitation and social support are of major importance for a patient suffering from psychiatric disease. Thus, although progress in the neurosciences is a positive development for clinical practice, it does not mean that (coercive) medication alone will carry a patient into recovery. A patient’s recovery is dependent, not only upon the process of finding the appropriate medication and trust between the psychiatrist and the patient, but also upon relational aspects, such as being recognised as a person, belonging, accepting responsibilities, developing friendships and trusting others. These findings lead to the conclusion that dealing with psychiatric diseases is more complex than what the biomedical model of neuroscience suggests and that one should include the social context of the patient in the recovery process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4875058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48750582016-06-21 Psychiatry in the age of neuroscience: the impact on clinical practice and lives of patients Landeweer, Elleke Abma, Tineke Santegoeds, Jolijn Widdershoven, Guy Poiesis Prax Focus Due to the progress being made in the neurosciences, higher expectations for the use of medication, even against the patient’s will, are arising in mental hospitals. In this article, we will discuss whether the neurosciences and new psychopharmacological solutions really support patients who suffer from mental illnesses. To answer this question, we will focus on the perspective of patients and their experiences with psychiatric (coercive) treatments. The analysis of one person’s story shows that other issues besides appropriate medication are important for recovery from a mental illness. In daily life, issues such as coping, rehabilitation and social support are of major importance for a patient suffering from psychiatric disease. Thus, although progress in the neurosciences is a positive development for clinical practice, it does not mean that (coercive) medication alone will carry a patient into recovery. A patient’s recovery is dependent, not only upon the process of finding the appropriate medication and trust between the psychiatrist and the patient, but also upon relational aspects, such as being recognised as a person, belonging, accepting responsibilities, developing friendships and trusting others. These findings lead to the conclusion that dealing with psychiatric diseases is more complex than what the biomedical model of neuroscience suggests and that one should include the social context of the patient in the recovery process. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2008-12-12 2009 /pmc/articles/PMC4875058/ /pubmed/27340391 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10202-008-0057-z Text en © The Author(s) 2008 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Focus
Landeweer, Elleke
Abma, Tineke
Santegoeds, Jolijn
Widdershoven, Guy
Psychiatry in the age of neuroscience: the impact on clinical practice and lives of patients
title Psychiatry in the age of neuroscience: the impact on clinical practice and lives of patients
title_full Psychiatry in the age of neuroscience: the impact on clinical practice and lives of patients
title_fullStr Psychiatry in the age of neuroscience: the impact on clinical practice and lives of patients
title_full_unstemmed Psychiatry in the age of neuroscience: the impact on clinical practice and lives of patients
title_short Psychiatry in the age of neuroscience: the impact on clinical practice and lives of patients
title_sort psychiatry in the age of neuroscience: the impact on clinical practice and lives of patients
topic Focus
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4875058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27340391
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10202-008-0057-z
work_keys_str_mv AT landeweerelleke psychiatryintheageofneurosciencetheimpactonclinicalpracticeandlivesofpatients
AT abmatineke psychiatryintheageofneurosciencetheimpactonclinicalpracticeandlivesofpatients
AT santegoedsjolijn psychiatryintheageofneurosciencetheimpactonclinicalpracticeandlivesofpatients
AT widdershovenguy psychiatryintheageofneurosciencetheimpactonclinicalpracticeandlivesofpatients