Cargando…
Prognostic value of PCT in septic emergency patients
BACKGROUND: An accurate assessment of septic patients at risk for poor clinical outcomes is challenging for clinicians in the emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of procalcitonin (PCT) in septic patients in the ED for predicting death. RESULTS: In a retro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Paris
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4875576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27207179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0146-4 |
_version_ | 1782433114101907456 |
---|---|
author | Peschanski, Nicolas Chenevier-Gobeaux, Camille Mzabi, Lynda Lucas, Rémy Ouahabi, Siham Aquilina, Vianney Brunel, Valéry Lefevre, Guillaume Ray, Patrick |
author_facet | Peschanski, Nicolas Chenevier-Gobeaux, Camille Mzabi, Lynda Lucas, Rémy Ouahabi, Siham Aquilina, Vianney Brunel, Valéry Lefevre, Guillaume Ray, Patrick |
author_sort | Peschanski, Nicolas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An accurate assessment of septic patients at risk for poor clinical outcomes is challenging for clinicians in the emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of procalcitonin (PCT) in septic patients in the ED for predicting death. RESULTS: In a retrospective study, 188 septic patients (median age 63 [IQR 51–80]) of two French university hospitals were included. Patients who deceased within 30 days (20 %, n = 37) presented higher PCT value at admission (median 34.0 µg/L [5.0–71.9]) in comparison with the survivals (median 6.4 µg/L [4.1–13.1], p = 0.0005). ROC curve analysis indicated a moderate AUC of 0.686 [95 % CI 0.613–0.752] and an optimal PCT threshold value at 32.5 [95 % CI 21.8–43.3] µg/L that was associated with a 51 % [34–67] sensitivity, a 96 % [90–98] specificity, a 73 % [52–88] positive predictive value, and a 89 % [83–93] negative predictive value for death. Only 26 patients (14 %) had PCT values above this threshold (19 in the deceased group vs 7 in survival group, p < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, only three variables remained significantly predictive of the death: personal history of cardiovascular disease (OR 3.1 [1.0–9.4], p = 0.046), the presence of severe sepsis/septic shock in the ER (OR 4.4 [1.3–12.3], p = 0.013), and a PCT level >32.5 µg/L (OR 36.0 [10.0–128.4], p < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained when considering the combined outcome death and/or admission in ICU. CONCLUSION: Elevated value of PCT at admission has moderate accuracy to identify poor outcome in ED septic patients in daily practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4875576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Paris |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-48755762016-06-21 Prognostic value of PCT in septic emergency patients Peschanski, Nicolas Chenevier-Gobeaux, Camille Mzabi, Lynda Lucas, Rémy Ouahabi, Siham Aquilina, Vianney Brunel, Valéry Lefevre, Guillaume Ray, Patrick Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: An accurate assessment of septic patients at risk for poor clinical outcomes is challenging for clinicians in the emergency department (ED). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of procalcitonin (PCT) in septic patients in the ED for predicting death. RESULTS: In a retrospective study, 188 septic patients (median age 63 [IQR 51–80]) of two French university hospitals were included. Patients who deceased within 30 days (20 %, n = 37) presented higher PCT value at admission (median 34.0 µg/L [5.0–71.9]) in comparison with the survivals (median 6.4 µg/L [4.1–13.1], p = 0.0005). ROC curve analysis indicated a moderate AUC of 0.686 [95 % CI 0.613–0.752] and an optimal PCT threshold value at 32.5 [95 % CI 21.8–43.3] µg/L that was associated with a 51 % [34–67] sensitivity, a 96 % [90–98] specificity, a 73 % [52–88] positive predictive value, and a 89 % [83–93] negative predictive value for death. Only 26 patients (14 %) had PCT values above this threshold (19 in the deceased group vs 7 in survival group, p < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, only three variables remained significantly predictive of the death: personal history of cardiovascular disease (OR 3.1 [1.0–9.4], p = 0.046), the presence of severe sepsis/septic shock in the ER (OR 4.4 [1.3–12.3], p = 0.013), and a PCT level >32.5 µg/L (OR 36.0 [10.0–128.4], p < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained when considering the combined outcome death and/or admission in ICU. CONCLUSION: Elevated value of PCT at admission has moderate accuracy to identify poor outcome in ED septic patients in daily practice. Springer Paris 2016-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4875576/ /pubmed/27207179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0146-4 Text en © Peschanski et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Peschanski, Nicolas Chenevier-Gobeaux, Camille Mzabi, Lynda Lucas, Rémy Ouahabi, Siham Aquilina, Vianney Brunel, Valéry Lefevre, Guillaume Ray, Patrick Prognostic value of PCT in septic emergency patients |
title | Prognostic value of PCT in septic emergency patients |
title_full | Prognostic value of PCT in septic emergency patients |
title_fullStr | Prognostic value of PCT in septic emergency patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic value of PCT in septic emergency patients |
title_short | Prognostic value of PCT in septic emergency patients |
title_sort | prognostic value of pct in septic emergency patients |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4875576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27207179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0146-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peschanskinicolas prognosticvalueofpctinsepticemergencypatients AT cheneviergobeauxcamille prognosticvalueofpctinsepticemergencypatients AT mzabilynda prognosticvalueofpctinsepticemergencypatients AT lucasremy prognosticvalueofpctinsepticemergencypatients AT ouahabisiham prognosticvalueofpctinsepticemergencypatients AT aquilinavianney prognosticvalueofpctinsepticemergencypatients AT brunelvalery prognosticvalueofpctinsepticemergencypatients AT lefevreguillaume prognosticvalueofpctinsepticemergencypatients AT raypatrick prognosticvalueofpctinsepticemergencypatients |