Cargando…

Tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholders

BACKGROUND: Infection prevention and control can be seen as a wicked public health problem as there is no consensus regarding problem definition and solution, multiple stakeholders with different needs and values are involved, and there is no clear end-point of the problem-solving process. Co-creati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Woezik, Anne F. G., Braakman-Jansen, Louise M. A., Kulyk, Olga, Siemons, Liseth, van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E. W. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4875594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27213040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-016-0119-2
_version_ 1782433117642948608
author van Woezik, Anne F. G.
Braakman-Jansen, Louise M. A.
Kulyk, Olga
Siemons, Liseth
van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E. W. C.
author_facet van Woezik, Anne F. G.
Braakman-Jansen, Louise M. A.
Kulyk, Olga
Siemons, Liseth
van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E. W. C.
author_sort van Woezik, Anne F. G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Infection prevention and control can be seen as a wicked public health problem as there is no consensus regarding problem definition and solution, multiple stakeholders with different needs and values are involved, and there is no clear end-point of the problem-solving process. Co-creation with stakeholders has been proposed as a suitable strategy to tackle wicked problems, yet little information and no clear step-by-step guide exist on how to do this. The objectives of this study were to develop a guideline to assist developers in tackling wicked problems using co-creation with stakeholders, and to apply this guideline to practice with an example case in the field of infection prevention and control. METHODS: A mixed-method approach consisting of the integration of both quantitative and qualitative research was used. Relevant stakeholders from the veterinary, human health, and public health sectors were identified using a literature scan, expert recommendations, and snowball sampling. The stakeholder salience approach was used to select key stakeholders based on 3 attributes: power, legitimacy, and urgency. Key values of stakeholders (N = 20) were derived by qualitative semi-structured interviews and quantitatively weighted and prioritized using an online survey. RESULTS: Our method showed that stakeholder identification and analysis are prerequisites for understanding the complex stakeholder network that characterizes wicked problems. A total of 73 stakeholders were identified of which 36 were selected as potential key stakeholders, and only one was seen as a definite stakeholder. In addition, deriving key stakeholder values is a necessity to gain insights into different problem definitions, solutions and needs stakeholders have regarding the wicked problem. Based on the methods used, we developed a step-by-step guideline for co-creation with stakeholders when tackling wicked problems. CONCLUSIONS: The mixed-methods guideline presented here provides a systematic, transparent method to identify, analyze, and co-create with stakeholders, and to recognize and prioritize their values, problem definitions, and solutions in the context of wicked problems. This guideline consists of a general framework and although it was applied in an eHealth context, may be relevant outside of eHealth as well.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4875594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48755942016-05-22 Tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholders van Woezik, Anne F. G. Braakman-Jansen, Louise M. A. Kulyk, Olga Siemons, Liseth van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E. W. C. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Infection prevention and control can be seen as a wicked public health problem as there is no consensus regarding problem definition and solution, multiple stakeholders with different needs and values are involved, and there is no clear end-point of the problem-solving process. Co-creation with stakeholders has been proposed as a suitable strategy to tackle wicked problems, yet little information and no clear step-by-step guide exist on how to do this. The objectives of this study were to develop a guideline to assist developers in tackling wicked problems using co-creation with stakeholders, and to apply this guideline to practice with an example case in the field of infection prevention and control. METHODS: A mixed-method approach consisting of the integration of both quantitative and qualitative research was used. Relevant stakeholders from the veterinary, human health, and public health sectors were identified using a literature scan, expert recommendations, and snowball sampling. The stakeholder salience approach was used to select key stakeholders based on 3 attributes: power, legitimacy, and urgency. Key values of stakeholders (N = 20) were derived by qualitative semi-structured interviews and quantitatively weighted and prioritized using an online survey. RESULTS: Our method showed that stakeholder identification and analysis are prerequisites for understanding the complex stakeholder network that characterizes wicked problems. A total of 73 stakeholders were identified of which 36 were selected as potential key stakeholders, and only one was seen as a definite stakeholder. In addition, deriving key stakeholder values is a necessity to gain insights into different problem definitions, solutions and needs stakeholders have regarding the wicked problem. Based on the methods used, we developed a step-by-step guideline for co-creation with stakeholders when tackling wicked problems. CONCLUSIONS: The mixed-methods guideline presented here provides a systematic, transparent method to identify, analyze, and co-create with stakeholders, and to recognize and prioritize their values, problem definitions, and solutions in the context of wicked problems. This guideline consists of a general framework and although it was applied in an eHealth context, may be relevant outside of eHealth as well. BioMed Central 2016-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4875594/ /pubmed/27213040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-016-0119-2 Text en © van Woezik et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
van Woezik, Anne F. G.
Braakman-Jansen, Louise M. A.
Kulyk, Olga
Siemons, Liseth
van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E. W. C.
Tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholders
title Tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholders
title_full Tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholders
title_fullStr Tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholders
title_full_unstemmed Tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholders
title_short Tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholders
title_sort tackling wicked problems in infection prevention and control: a guideline for co-creation with stakeholders
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4875594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27213040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-016-0119-2
work_keys_str_mv AT vanwoezikannefg tacklingwickedproblemsininfectionpreventionandcontrolaguidelineforcocreationwithstakeholders
AT braakmanjansenlouisema tacklingwickedproblemsininfectionpreventionandcontrolaguidelineforcocreationwithstakeholders
AT kulykolga tacklingwickedproblemsininfectionpreventionandcontrolaguidelineforcocreationwithstakeholders
AT siemonsliseth tacklingwickedproblemsininfectionpreventionandcontrolaguidelineforcocreationwithstakeholders
AT vangemertpijnenjuliaewc tacklingwickedproblemsininfectionpreventionandcontrolaguidelineforcocreationwithstakeholders