Cargando…

The evolution of anthropoid molar proportions

BACKGROUND: Developmental processes that underpin morphological variation have become a focus of interest when attempting to interpret macroevolutionary patterns. Recently, the Dental Inhibitory Cascade (dic) model has been suggested to explain much of the variation in mammalian molar size proportio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carter, Katherine E., Worthington, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4875740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27206521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-016-0673-5
_version_ 1782433150545166336
author Carter, Katherine E.
Worthington, Steven
author_facet Carter, Katherine E.
Worthington, Steven
author_sort Carter, Katherine E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Developmental processes that underpin morphological variation have become a focus of interest when attempting to interpret macroevolutionary patterns. Recently, the Dental Inhibitory Cascade (dic) model has been suggested to explain much of the variation in mammalian molar size proportions. We tested the macroevolutionary implications of this model using anthropoid primate species (n=100), focusing on overall morphological patterns, as well as predictions made about molar size variability, direct developmental control, and diet. RESULTS: Of the species sampled, 56 % had centroids that fell within regions of molar proportion morphospace consistent with the dic model. We also found that the third molar had greater variation in size than either the first or second molars, as expected by the model. Some dic model predictions were not supported, however, such as the expected proportion of M(2)/M(1) when the third molar is absent. Furthermore, we found that some variability in third molar size could not be explained by the influence of the inhibitory cascade. Overall, we found considerable clade-specific differences in relative molar sizes among anthropoid primates, with hominoids and cercopithecins strongly divergent from dic model predictions, and platyrrhines, colobines, and papionins more consistent with the inhibitory cascade. Finally, we investigated reasons why some clades deviated from dic model expectations. Adaptations for frugivory (e.g., bunodont cusp relief) appeared to be one driver of relatively larger second molars and have evolved independently in multiple lineages of anthropoids. CONCLUSIONS: The dic model explains some of the variation in anthropoid primate molar proportions. However, there are interesting deviations away from this broad mammalian pattern, particularly in hominoids and cercopithecins, which suggest the model is only one of multiple mechanisms determining morphological variability in mammalian teeth. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0673-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4875740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-48757402016-05-22 The evolution of anthropoid molar proportions Carter, Katherine E. Worthington, Steven BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Developmental processes that underpin morphological variation have become a focus of interest when attempting to interpret macroevolutionary patterns. Recently, the Dental Inhibitory Cascade (dic) model has been suggested to explain much of the variation in mammalian molar size proportions. We tested the macroevolutionary implications of this model using anthropoid primate species (n=100), focusing on overall morphological patterns, as well as predictions made about molar size variability, direct developmental control, and diet. RESULTS: Of the species sampled, 56 % had centroids that fell within regions of molar proportion morphospace consistent with the dic model. We also found that the third molar had greater variation in size than either the first or second molars, as expected by the model. Some dic model predictions were not supported, however, such as the expected proportion of M(2)/M(1) when the third molar is absent. Furthermore, we found that some variability in third molar size could not be explained by the influence of the inhibitory cascade. Overall, we found considerable clade-specific differences in relative molar sizes among anthropoid primates, with hominoids and cercopithecins strongly divergent from dic model predictions, and platyrrhines, colobines, and papionins more consistent with the inhibitory cascade. Finally, we investigated reasons why some clades deviated from dic model expectations. Adaptations for frugivory (e.g., bunodont cusp relief) appeared to be one driver of relatively larger second molars and have evolved independently in multiple lineages of anthropoids. CONCLUSIONS: The dic model explains some of the variation in anthropoid primate molar proportions. However, there are interesting deviations away from this broad mammalian pattern, particularly in hominoids and cercopithecins, which suggest the model is only one of multiple mechanisms determining morphological variability in mammalian teeth. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0673-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4875740/ /pubmed/27206521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-016-0673-5 Text en © Carter and Worthington. 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Carter, Katherine E.
Worthington, Steven
The evolution of anthropoid molar proportions
title The evolution of anthropoid molar proportions
title_full The evolution of anthropoid molar proportions
title_fullStr The evolution of anthropoid molar proportions
title_full_unstemmed The evolution of anthropoid molar proportions
title_short The evolution of anthropoid molar proportions
title_sort evolution of anthropoid molar proportions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4875740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27206521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-016-0673-5
work_keys_str_mv AT carterkatherinee theevolutionofanthropoidmolarproportions
AT worthingtonsteven theevolutionofanthropoidmolarproportions
AT carterkatherinee evolutionofanthropoidmolarproportions
AT worthingtonsteven evolutionofanthropoidmolarproportions